Show UTTERLY despicable tub liberal organ denies that it la in 1 customary with it to put words into mens mouths hat that t they never uttered it does this too in its customary blackguard style we have demonstrated our charge scores of times by reproducing the pretended quotations made by that organ and the actual language of the speakers or writers thus misrepresented it to is a common trick of the tribunes it will not only misquote mens words and proceed to build up an argument based on the misquotation but attribute language to public speakers which was not used by anyone any one and credit it to men who were not present on the occasion its ite reports of sunday services in the tabernacle have become a public scandal because of their utter fake falsehood hood as well as sacrilegious ribaldry and their frequent libelous caricatures of gentlemen said to have officiated who were not in the at the time in the same columns which deny the charge of putting words into mens mouths that they never uttered the shameless scribes have this to say A few months ago apostle moses thatcher informed the rank and file of the saints that apostle heber J grant had received a special commission from the almighty to handle their finances in a way to get the very most out of them this is an example of their customary way apostle moses thatcher did not make any such announcement the gentleman referred to is not engaged in handling the finances of the saints by special commis corn mission I from any source human or divine it has not been stated by I 1 any church authority that either he or any one else had bad been appointed for any such purpose in other words these customary Hb li bellers ellere simply lie an aa usual they add this time those were not exactly the apostles words worda but they carry the idea which he meant to convey 11 this saving paving clause is inserted because they have been exposed so many times in their falsehood that they fear another showing up and so they think to dodge behind this subterfuge but it will not do the words do not carry the idea he intended to convey but something they have falsely attributed to the speaker who neither said nor attempted to say any such thing their contemptible trickery is not confined to anti mormon dec eption either on the silver question on the present political movement on any subject of dispute they scarcely ever quote the exact language laia guage or describe fairly the position of an opponent but descend to the lowest plane of cipley journalism and misrepresent both the worda and intent of their adversary ver sary there is not a paper in the united states that is so BO utterly unreliable and despicable as the liberal organ |