Show NO FENCE LAW BT ST juhn jurns s march ad 1678 editors deseret ewa the fence question ia 18 stilt still a matter of considerable discussion lon ion in tolela county strange though tile the stoc stock k man does doek not ilke like to be cespon responsible sibie sible for the dan dnn damages dages his animals will do on his hia neighbors premises whether said premises promises be protected by fence or not too much much weak work to look after his own proper ty but I 1 do not hesitate ate h a second in making the tb that the stock man does not noe noc kropa stop slop a moment to consider and reason the matter within himself or he would go like an honorable man and takei take carer of his cattle for instance we say two men atari out to td terland eli ell enter land one a stock mani man arid and the other an agriculturist the tiller of bf the 1 soil bows sows his bis grain on his land of course which will remain remal non on the same ground d that chat he puts it until the crop is harvested and will molest no one anthe on the other hand the he be terms himself far from being worthy of the term turns his stock out and in in a few minutes they are on his neighbors grain or land und because some western stock raisers are never known to provide anything for their tock stock but depend entirely on providence and their agricultural neighbors for their ero pro provender which of the two is the intrude i the intruder is the one that ought to fence it would 1 be bb just as reasonable fora tor for a danwit man with h a thousand dollars to insist on his peor to buy him a safe to keep his money as to make the one that tills the soil fence agalias against the stock mans mana mans eattle cattle I 1 do not wish to be understood to advocate a farm without a fence a farmer cannot live comfortable without a fence and every thriving farmer farmar will fence as quick as he lid can and it is the hight of tyranny in any person or person persons s th that at wa will ll 11 cast their yote vote to debar a man that wants to raise his bread that he can noldo do 0 ao o 13 mute hb lie cannot fence lence against their stock Fenc fencing ingis is a har hay hard d laborious expensive work especially ally when a man has nothing of his own to fence against and no capital to do it with as the in most ost ofu afu of us a have bave been but we ought to consider that the best of the land is i taken up fencing material is pretty well used up the poor are emigrating hore bore evary every year in search of homes aud and it ia Is little that we will do by letting them have all the land they want of or such ag SO we did not want the parties complain of the legislature favoring the ag ag ri rl luu iri my opinion t they ey were ejust onia pee third short abort of that others Othera grumble bie ble that thoy they haye have to come to the theno ud nd fence law to such there is no hd such jaw law they hir air they have a mind to that la Is of thel rown land and leap 1 1 ibe the benefit of the same 1 E J A |