Show LOCAL AND OTHER MATTERS FROM FROAL TUESDAYS DAILY SOLD the bankrupt stock odthe of the defunct salt lake edview review was eold under the ham mer this morning for 1100 mr 0 G sawyer was wab the purchaser TROOPS roil for beaver A dispatch from ogden I 1 received this morning says bays two hundred and fifty U S troops will witt arrive from the east today to day for beaver city abarge A large number of ambulance wagons wagon ac fcc left camp douglas for the same destination yesterday morning tufe thue GILSON case cape at 10 this thib a morning the investigation of the charge made on the affidavit of johh johr thomas a against galust S 11 gilson ex bailiff of the grand jury commenced in the justices I 1 court city hall his hla honor S W richards on the bench mr hugan appeared for the people maxwell and 0 M hawley for the defendant the following is a copy of the AFFIDAVIT territory 0 of f 1 in Jus jup justice itice court be U utah lor az 1 fore nores fores S W V richards county of S salt sall t as ustice justice lake J of the peace the people of the united 1 states in the terri plaintiff tory of utah vs i samuel gilson J defendant john thomas being first duly sworn den del poses and says that be is a male citizen of the united states and Is ia over the age of twenty one years that on or about the ath day or of march A D 1872 at salt lake county utah territory the said defendi defendant int tnt samuel gilson then and there threatened wilfully and maliciously to accuse affiant of a public crime to wit larceny and at the time and place aforesaid the said defendant samuel gilson did then and there wilfully and maliciously threaten to kill this affiant that by reason of such willful and malicious threats as aforesaid and with the intent thereby to compel affiant to subscribe and swear to an affidavit which affidavit as affiant is informed and believes is dated on or about the seventh day of march AD 1872 12 and which affidavit as affiant is informed and believes Js is now in the possession of the prosecuting officers of said salt lake county affiant wai wa i then and there compelled against his will by the said dehon debon defendant dant daut samuel gilson to subscribe and swear to said affidavit that on the date last above mentioned affiant was imprisoned for an alleged against the laws of the territory that the affidavit aforesaid Is ia false in substance and was obtained by defendant from affiant by reason of the aforesaid threats and a against ainest the will of ann aff affiant lant all of which Is contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided wherefore affiant prays that the said sald samuel gilson be dealt with according to law signed jonn JOHN tuomas THOMAS subscribed and sworn to before me this ath day of may AD 1872 J W STAINBURN notary public S L county prisoners counsel moved to dismiss the proceedings because the tho complaining witness did not appear before the justice who issued the warrant on which their client was arrested but before a notary public the court overruled over ruled the motion and a plea of NOT GUILTY was entered by the defence T the h e folli following wing witnesses were called callei and sworn for the prosecution john thomas william walker and william horton william walker deposed that he was clerk of the third judicial district court in salt lake county that he had not in his possession an affidavit signed by john thomas sworn to and dated about the ath of march 72 and did no not know sheroit whore it wa john thomas was the next witness examined ilia his testimony was lengthy and rambling almost inco incoherent kerent and to the effect that he had been boen confined at camp douglas on as he said a 11 trumped up charke chark of horse borse stealing lie lia knew gilson had had conversations with him in the month of march both at camp douglas douglaas and in this city relative to an affidavit in the baker bobinaoux case ease day jay of march he was brought down from camp douglas in the buggy of one green ou ough gh and taken to the office of marshal patrick and on a piazza in the rear of that office he had a conversation with gilson in which lie he gilson stated that ho he bad put this joh job the charge haf eaf horse stealing on to him thomas that he intended to keep him confined and would bring men mea forward to swear to his guilt of the crime with which he was charged unless he be would sign a paper that be gilson gibson had id his pocket in relation to baker and the robinson murder case gilson said he was working to obtain the conviction of the parties arrested in that ease case and he wanted no luau to interfere with his operations he knew that witness could defeat them aud and to prevent him doing so he had him arrested on the charge of horse dorse stealing gilson also said that the i an from whom witness bought the horse would come forward and swear to his guilt or anything he gilson desired when he made this statement gilson admitted that there was not a bigger thief in nevada or utah than this man witness deposed that ho he did not know the contents of the paper which gilson jilson wished him to sign I 1 but he signed it under the influence of his threats the third witness examined was william orton who deposed that he was confined at camp douglas at the same rame time as thomas he remembered a day he be believed it was the last of february or bo be ginning of march on which gison and thomas had a conversation together in a kind of a passage P way between the room where whore the prisoners w re confined and that occupied by the guard he beard gilson say to thomas you must do tois this or you cant get discharged disco diaco arged 11 arter after Gi Gil lyons sons departure thomis thomas was very much excited and told witness that gilson had made a pro proposition position to him to come to salt lake city and make wake an affidavit in regard to the baker robinson denying a statement that he be bitnes wit nes had previous lamade ly made rho thomas Cho massaid said gald that he was in a bad fix and asked the advice of the witness and finally said he supposed hf he should be dobli obliged t d aa in consequence of gillons Gil sons threats I 1 to st sign g nth the statement further anve investigation of the case was postponed until 4 this anner afner afternoon nooh MORE mone LIE lle in the new now york herald of may is the following salt lake april 30 1872 the decision of the united states supreme court has stripped the courts of the territory of a ali hll 1 their officers by this decision the united states marshal cannot serve processes in any territorial matters which must now be served by the territorial marshal am A small clique of jack mormons cormons and adventurers here have sent a dispatch to the country denying the accuracy of your correspondents reports but no sen hen sensible sible sibie well informed person for a moment ques the truth of the dispatches this clique has lifts ulterior objects to gain which are unworthy of notice FATAL ACCIDENT about seven last night a team being driven by ed carloss ran away in the twentieth ward and when opposite the residence of mr charles ringwood carloss carioss wats wass thrown out of the wagon both wheels of which passed over him ile he received a severe cat out in the forehead was badly hll hij injured tired in the right groin and one or of his ribs was broken besides being badly shaken and bruised internally he was taken into the house of I 1 mr ir ringwood and medical ald aid rendered him and about ten ton lie he was removed to his hll own residence in the fourth ward a few fesi hours after which he expired we undoes he was about thirty nive five years yeara old and unmarried frow FRONI wednesdays DAILY information WANTED if brother samuel hunt who left the london conference about four years since will communicate with eider elder R F ho be will hear hea of something to his hla advantage address R F box boa salt lake city two SIDES TOO macir before us lies a lengthy communication from the country written on both sides of the paper now if correspondents knew how that sort ol 01 oi thing vexes the souls of the compositors compositor s t the provocation would not be offered ra so 0 often as it is moral write only on one ride alde of manuscript intended for publication it is far better to put twice as much on one side than to write on both SOUND DOCTRINE E lizabeth elizabeth heward howard writes from draper april 24 that mie vie ln in habitants babi babl tants tanta of of this territory ana are bl manufacture everything they need if they would endeavor to do it and she concludes her note as follows 1 I am ashamed when I 1 seh see the daughters of ofelon zion dressed after the most mos silly fashions of the world when the lord has commanded us to let iet the beauty of oue oab clothing be tho the workmanship olour of our own hands all of which is very good doctrine and elizabeth might have hinted that some of the sons of zion spend means quite as foolishly a ai any ot of the daughters do THE Gir olk laos lmos lAON easm ease the investigation of this thia case was resumed at 4 yesterday afternoon before his honor S W richards the remaining witness for the cu cation lion llon frank sadler was called but not being present pres eur the prosecution rested the evidence for the defence then thed gom fenced and as only one witness was examined general maxwell one of the counsel of the accused we give a verbatim report of his testimony the tiie questions being put by his co counsel mr Q general you reside in salt lake city A yes sir bir Q what aha t Is your profession A I 1 am an attorney at law and register of the land office at the present time Q do you know anything any ining about this affidavit A ye sir bir Q the procuring of it A well I 1 know something about it Q please to state to the court in your tour own language what you know abou tit ift A the day before the affidavit was made I 1 dont know what day it 11 was the oth or ath of march I 1 received information from somebody homebody that one mr nir marion desired to a see ee me at camp I 1 went to see him and the tile next day the jtb of march this man thomas thomaa came down and came into my office and said that he be desired to make mako a clean breast in the baker matter that the cormons mormons had thrown coffon off on him and tom fitch particularly I 1 told him I 1 expected to be district attorney atto atio ruey in a few days and could not talk with him and I 1 asked him to co go with me to the united marshals office and lie he went wont with me I 1 left him with the united states marshal I 1 do not noi know whether mr air high was present or riot dot but I 1 think I 1 spoke to him about the matter to see what he wanted to do I 1 beard board afterwards that an affidavit was pro eared earod ance ana the first I 1 ever haw BAW of it was the dy day the case of B ker iker on habeas corpus was brought up the morning of the invests in vesti gation gatlon of that cae there was a conversation in the court room between mr thomas and myself I 1 asked him what ne tie was go going ing t to 0 do lie ue said he was in the bands hands af oilier parties now I 1 interred inferred of course w what hat other parties they were and unless he could be assured pastured he be could have his bis liberty he would not substantiate the davit he admitted to me however that it was true that is all I 1 know of the aforesaid affidavit Q do you know of any threats having been made or special inducements tendered to mr thomas to get him to give this thia affidavit A no bir bin I 1 told him if he freed his hla breast he be must do it of his own free will that I 1 could giol not and would not if I 1 could give him any assurances of even my friendship in the matter Q did mr thomas when he came into your office inquire for mr gillson gillbo n A no sir air lell iol me see I 1 do not know I 1 think after having the conversation the day before with a man by the name of marion I 1 sent mr nir gillson to camp I 1 think I 1 asked him to go after I 1 came back from the marshals office met gillson on the street and told him I 1 think my words i were to go over and see what the man desired to say I 1 might have put it in stronger language but that was what I 1 meant Q do you yon know of any attempts having been made to induce mr thomas to give this affidavit before this time A none whatever before or since in fact I 1 did not know at that time what the ahe affidavit was about Q state if mr thomas made any state ment meat to you in legard regard to the purposes or reasons or objects which he had in making this affidavit A nothing further than I 1 have already abed cross exam examined nod noa by mr hugan Q general who brought brough tThomas thomas to your office A well I 1 think he was brought by a dep deputy ay marshal I 1 do not know his name an arrangement was made by which he was brought to our town Q what business did he say he be had when became there A I 1 do not remember what he said I 1 knew perfectly well what ho he was down for fon Q how did you know that A I 1 did not know of my own knowledge except from statements made to me by mr marion or some one respecting some arrangements about ball bail Q it was a supposition on your part A ves yes purely so Q you stated before general that i thomas said unless he could be ba assured pf af his liberty he would not substantiate the affidavit in whose presence was that abatement made A in the presence of the entire court but I 1 was whispering to him at the time 0 what induced thomas to make alt that assertion A I 1 do not net know sir bir I 1 cannot fathom his breast to find it out Q was there any prior conversation to to this thib A nothing at all sir air Q and thomas thomsa said voluntarily unless he could conid be assured of his hlis liberty he would not substantiate the mii affidavit davit A I 1 do not know whether be said it vol unwarily unta rily I 1 went up to him and said good morning and do not know exactly the conversation Q you stated to him that you were to be prosecuting attorn attorney ev in a few days A I 1 did sir bir and should have been if the Engelbrec lit tit decision had hati not been given that is il general grant knows what be is about I 1 do not know but I 1 shall be yet A did you or did you not general by reason of representing yourself in that prospective capacity induce this man to say rny what be did A mr hugan hagan an attorney who would ask another one a question of that kind would his honor I 1 answer no sir air 1 I did not Q I 1 do not accuse you general but I 1 it youage you are under cross eross exa examination in I 1 nation A all right Q are you attorney for gillson the defendant fen dant A I 1 am sir air Q are you defending him in this proceeding ce A I 1 am Q did you ever hear any conversation with gillson and this man thomas at camp douglas dou AV A never e ver sir bir Q you do not know what brought him hing down to your office A I 1 have already told you that it was because of a conversation I 1 had bad with marion I 1 made the arrangement forbid for him bim to be brought down to the marshals office to give his state ment meat to mr high 0 for what purpose was he to be brought i down A to make his statement if he had bad any to make it was not my moy business at that time mr bir high was prosecutor Q who gave the order for lor him to be brought down do you know A I 1 do not know I 1 presume the mad marn bhai ahai I 1 asked him to bring that man and mr mi marion if I 1 am not mistaken in the naine name down town I 1 think marion obtained ball bali the same day Q while these persons persona were in custody custoda and you were on the prosecution was wag ft t customary to have them brought down from camp dougla i to the marshals office nice fice T A 0 the marshal had bad control of them J do not remember whether anybody eise else eise else was brought down or not I 1 asked for no one else eise Q I 1 his bis was an |