Show V r NOT NOI NO mm t 3 4 j It In our London letter latter published March Murch t t 20 not nol In an In editorial ns lIS asserted was wall wallI I no nil Item heats which has hns been going the tha rounds about Mrs Mr Eddy of Christian d Science fame being n a descendant of ot ott I t Sir John McNeil ell of at 1 It up III peered originally original In tho the Ladles Home Journal In ht an article sail said to 10 have hae been beam prepared under Mrs Mra l personal lon A refutation of or the story was waa published In lit the th London Landon truth that the tho claim woe was baseless it und L false Ve Ye ate no now III In receipt of ot n a aletter letter le t r from M 1 11 II LIncicome of ot Ogden stating sitting that the matter fully full cor car corrected rooted reeled some seine tune time BRO ago In the tho ho Christian Sentinel It t was uvas wn u that the claim made mado In the biographical sketch about Mrs Eddy as its the source of ot information seemed to be authentic but hilt that an as a there thero Is la no positive proof that Sir John il was 38 her Mm Airs Eddy l r request that all nil others other oth r writing willing upon her biography shall in ht future futuro observe obern lye W give the this iv tlc not that thaI ua we think tho the matter of oC say All moment but In order that It may not Le I thought the tho News Nowa desires to t lie be unfair with anybody |