OCR Text |
Show I AS HEARD piajm f A T T HEARD MALL Jifc I J00 Expensive For Them I : '?" of hde-7fshow hde-7fshow that the .lion's inde-Kple inde-Kple would ". Present Social "lPPed in "Nation by a Ration. : w K?'e state Is? beer pro. ?e' less J p"vate insur- ' s ;51S Public. Perm,t "Ha , state sys- J coverage :?nploy. a Security :HsnemPioy-Mh :HsnemPioy-Mh i, annual ' fry m earn. ,!5sPect of This has become far too expensive, ex-pensive, the state employees complain, and the state retirement retire-ment proiam, operated by the state, is much better, than the Federal program. There is another iactor. Approximately 32 per cent of the state's employees are women wom-en and most of them, after paying the Social Security tax for years, will never receive any benefits because their husbands hus-bands benefits will exceed theirs. A. Alan Post, the long time esteemed legislative analyst for the State of California, a nonpartisan non-partisan position, agrees that state employees could end up with a better and less costly retirement program by pulling out of Social Security. This is disputed by the Federal Fed-eral Social Security officials in the state capitol. While the nation's independent indepen-dent employers, through the National Federation of Independent Inde-pendent Business say they cannot can-not afford to absorb any more payroll taxes, there is a move in Congress to boost them. But even In Washington they may get the news that 115,000 state employees in California want out of the Social Security system, in order to adopt a better, less costly plan. They are fc.tunate to the extent that their slate legislature can arrange ar-range for them to do this. So far, no such recourse is offered private employees, indent Business |