Show diny lie ho declares plural al lage wron even though iiii father did bid teach and it MB L 0 logan utah SIR SIM no to ordinances ell birj licens of wat liing and anointing anoint ins ell 1 I a I 1 in at lite alio niec rale eting tin nt at killian kill dmd 4 f but lit the te Mirtes that jestie it is the christ wis was titer cind canil the hie that christ Cl iril that lir he give to liis his disciple i filled the ilia hearts nil and controlled ill ahe a initial of ilia worshipers s in j 3 jour our first you oil stated positively that t there b ere tho thoo ae cumin fit in utah m ho bo lanil ilia stalled to mo me and in my 11 birther bi other th thit tt they were wives to ln my father thi 4 1 I have sh I 1 to I 1 01 10 0 conr cor I 1 it t not have be C it vl I 1 ater to as get one or more of those women to dan irime so the file tune those anil place macic such statement ulten lent WM was made Ide theca wis tills no need necil for me ire to go to silt salt lake city to find proof if 1 I 11 C ere ro ua der the nece ity to receive ts such acl chorla Cl oas orla fire are plentiful out ilia of salt lale lake city ind ami lire are no better there tun than al noail it if I 1 am to receive universally accepted re reports 0 t J smith ww was a bri hint hain young a thief anil and nn an abettor r ot of murder silt allt like lake city cily a place here lit li t laid anil are it at home anil and ion inn not you sire ire too shrewd to hold bor that I 1 alit ain to be concluded by universally illy accepted re the reach repents is too wide file tie the effect upon not only utah anil and her ice men but upon the origin vt of the church und ami its too valc prevailing rind I 1 to for you to insist upon 4 uch i fit acceptance sly my course in salt lake city was till I 1 vas upon uroil the streets street clalla biily esaw of 0 the nion aboin I 1 lial seen when a boy I 1 ass introduced liy by patriarch jolin smith to many others of the citizens I 1 shunned cil no BO one I 1 declared publicly ll 11 in I 1 tile the InAl institute tute in ill ari anwer biver to t the I 1 e q question as whether my father did or did not have a ling or his elder s to hil vc more thrift one wife that I 1 did not know that dint the egida nes I 1 hold had aso 60 far received hall failed to convince tile me that lie he had I 1 lil dill not know lie had or had not pi ic plural 0 marriage arin ge that it I 1 threw diac I 1 re r the buidry as an of T picot whole it belonged Itai ged oil those who affirmed that hint lie I 1 had I 1 all the revelation aud and practiced the hie doctrine tills this was done ile publicly and ami these were members ot of your church resent laid heard inc the S ca ill of john tailor 1 I 1 bor it at t bolln boulogne ne sur mer was coo cou p of w tl titie alin or of the artile on an mari ilage ia a then lit in the dottrina Dott fine allt aint Covel lauts bilt taken out ol 01 by order 0 if arst young without n i note of tle tile chardi in 1870 1876 1 I lie ile intent with 1 it WL WAS retail benl was to deny the lite cliar charge goo of li it lying in in practice fit utah a 1 ia 63 stem by N fault life I 1 of the church I 1 hail I 1 III fit iloie 0 i a ive with till all that the nime name ain fill than one the language lin of ilie hook book is il cleir clear ve a deblare thit we believe that on mini man donld should if lye ont wife and one woman hut but one husband except ceceil in enic ot of death when either cither it ii at liberty to 11 agun again then i is 4 no mistaking mii taking this thia dental of mr tay taylora lors bilth tile artile oil if I 1 and it is con coil it if at that time there wu wad in fit operation 1 a I system by which nien nell avie married manildi or beaded to women as wives other tha th anthe tithe one legal wife a ife of a 1 momentous coined tons chai character acter tint that I 1 nm luni fighting against tooth dutli in fit opposing posing that system ey stena mr ta lot lor w iii cuilty F of 0 falsehood Te clinically illy M clr or tailor a I 1 lor s d ehlt I 1 waa isas true I 1 tile the law of 0 tit lie er church I 1 aur ell IIA lie AN well 11 knew wits was al against hira tind and illi ha tt it allowed of no such es tie the formula forn iuli given in fix the lawyre law re quilt cuned ial tile suction of the marriages of the hie omicle to be in tile the mine 11 a of t the lie lord J asui C I 1 I 1 net if and nd by 1 I I 1 I 1 t is a of the laws of the canuti co tile the reason rea gincie in ila the article on oil marria c for the del declaration of belief is 1 thit that its cinq chul chui i Is h of chrict hiis has been reproached mth arith the of 0 fornication mid and the crime of POlY polygamy ganY ve uc elare etc 1 I tom am thankful lor let your alit lio lionett honc nety ty in in billing thai the things of which ilia hie church wits then ac cusel nore mere utterly c posed to its this I 1 ana my eo cocoi broil vroil ners ken have been otilli foxily bli iving to show and am 01 mcay ci y admission such as ours is in kaing kee kc pill ing with out our position tile the delay in my illy father to 1 irr I ill the a P plural mairig l was and is ii by you attributed to 1110 of the prejudices ot of I 1 lie brethren nil anil tile the I 1 abi it lie hi well weil hueu line lie in koubi 11 anve lye 0 encounter from lie hie ahei sitf life be endangered I 1 do not this it is it a plain adeclat alion iv iven ell us ni at reason IV why fly joseph stilla did not make lunke rion the revelation it if lie he hall it wool it fur a lile lilac reison reason thit that fiig bi ig haburn young too bight years axial two wo inouchi to get catura cuu 0 elou enough g to 0 malf luvill it kno known ull yon aa 0 nul t say that UR toy my lh rr licit to ti make it I 1 known but ut that lie he because lie ho uell nell knew that ilia his life would lie iw endanger cil it ij not tatt charging him with mith being clr afraid icil whence earne tile the pre it at tile the biet limn vital aliat usiller hall had they to have I 1 lie hie stunt or of ho 12 lord I 1 what gave ribe to or is T I 1 I 1 WA WAS S as elder joseph 1 smith r batell to nhat w lint elder 0 was saying in the discourse dt from which I 1 quoted I 1 tried fried to conduct in a quiet inlet ordella trial ind way I 1 took look notes ot of tile entire efer sermon nion i and con can give elery eiery point in it from notes anade it lie time I 1 wm wax intent to liao vcr lite talent and bent ot of hi flip speaker nuil was ivas equally V intent to to take of anything that might ht lo be haid fill lo 10 alie tiofil of ot 1 1 1 I 1 f I 1 ind the cause I 1 re ir anteal 1 lit i atol tat r n chinse if so elder ducr L 0 littlest Litt left dif laid ciery other oilier elder evir tint ti nt out by ilia Ch churila urcla bosq 11 P F smith nil file nifty guilty ot of the same clinic it II it n life ii caly ilia vleit it the hie latter has doine in 0 so o denying w it I 1 Ilse lassel fed leil n 1 iiii I 8 annl aid ly by eller aa itar 0 res iman petting in tor temples liples I 1 gave it as I 1 heard lie iril it front froin notes rit tile tune hille laid and I 1 I 1 remember it ir the ali state in nickita cuts duade would to be noticed dud and cosimo efrece vim apoll nia 1110 toun court ter acted by those in charge of tile lie meeting licit told thel lext day ahm p ietti A var in belief lim clit it ind final asked vleit what do 10 you yon think ot of it us as the pemon was wi liea to lanke I 1 open t of ny I 1 evil to admirers of ai mr for pratt I 1 rIN 11 plied lien I 1 that I 1 isas pleased idea cd willi it that I 1 braill had I 1 thought le nied on one thing ething ind that hat was that oison aratt ar itt left to tell the truth all I 1 have faither fu illier to nahl add is this I 1 amny red hane c ini staken alder later pratts ivor 4 tile the beshe to di coler coer any if possible pos ible advantage may inay have made rile me too natal and per vented vr teil hii fit incani ug ire are elder I 1 smith trial tit the others who tata state I 1 that ll 11 i they did not licar hear such statement free filin such pay lizan bi bias ts its as lio lie seems to think troubled lil me Is ii his of 1 I i to which lit liis at lention duay not before haie been called since the lite day it wai delivered likely to be hearty any clearer of 0 defect because of front from undue zeal for lii ili i clause than TJ alie I 1 a question of veracity veri city may rest hel heie 0 ilow how much ii nii better is 11 your idea against the at Kitt wittland land fail and those thoc who met there fund your nc lie fatrice of tile temples you are bu in in utah is ia the statement of F smith as is to nhit M flat elder pratt t mil ill say sav that tile temple chich licit we a building in salt lake city was not ilia temple on which we uc ex cv e lecci the I 1 lie cloud would rest reat nor sl hd we expect these glorious events to tr fit in any of the temples 11 if fell we iva wt ario I q now noir building or would baiba in utah but that the file temple in ili winch these giomi ea should be fulfill rd d should et el le ile built in jackson CULI county fity aali 1 do ad at and ilia thit I 1 t not all that were nvere to living atif s in should p ass asis away nn ilia to lil t arnt in temple should be built etc etc cie sonia some droe nie of those piment will that after the servie services eid I 1 met elder pratt with two or thi coi others and ami was uras prevented to him on oil the street noir near to the meeting house n anil to lo him bins that havin been it rn ell nii lie or ir tile loic cioe ot of 1832 1932 1 1 cranial to lie ile one of oe cioe that alight bo bi living when thit that to liu hv ii 11 ill id I 1 real bli lr be built to till dili lie im lepied ill tint it to have pit in it bouli deperi I on lit ai 1 nall ell us a 1 I that tto ili a ini take ot of tuen toty ille que holat between ui li ti li tile one of plurality ilura lity ol of la Is the duc doctrine trine and the lit in accord anci ica wilh the principles of the Cli chuu kirch ut ot 01 clarisl chrlot ns as 1111 wet church toun foun duil deal by Jos Joor cili idt benth rim iluk question i nut not aleci led liy by lite hie statement that joseph taught all aaa practiced cil batch doctrine or one to it in sc tit nor am ain I 1 concluded it as an ill licie tic and ami fighter against god or liu his word boril lien it it 11 proven provell that lie lul secief ly 1 I so to a luw few clwell ones abid secretly so pral tice tc the won elders used to that hiu if our forefathers forefather i or our father did hiie carry their coo cm it to null juill I 1 in 1 I one note i nl of the lia iiii NN with ith a stolle thili to ili in tile other alln r end to ta bi lince latice it it wis was no ito reason thit e choul I do the iline that we 1 vere ere to do our ox ciui if thinking fog ind and mh mcateer ateer of doctrine was not in accord with willi lite word of toll god IN vi IC reto to discard justko the alie liable ives tile alie origin of 0 tile the institution ot ariage thus kud and the th I 1 lib ili aich lite lord god hall hail gaeu atoni dinati goodo lie a is binau oui iu and birr unto aniu ft a man wane e his bli luber glicr anil and ili liia ni olber clealle ble hl nife dud aul they fiill khall be one deb to in ill the history of 0 the life final gen erat ration ican of main asi as given i in R Genc ganesh titer lere a is no hint or re I 1 clice to lint but tile he out buo coil pan ion one nia lie wife for foe hini him malachi seems to have to it in the I 1 of ai the uth awl ani lath vries of ili ani second beccia chapter lattice yet Is title alio illy companion anil and tile ito ire rt of thy aal il dill alil D not lit ho hat onike one tot final lie the tlc alc rollic ot of tit hie and where foill tott lio bal bughi neck berk a godly seed departed filin to evil talili I 1 tile nul and took two alli I 1 lie 0 a became it 1 l murderer ilia to noth wm comp lefelt in llo ilia baing MI ing of tile inaam calls by chidi ill carth was to be re rc peril lod noall nu ili and hit wife lin three bolls anil and one wife eccli no more the new blows the full endorsement of this liy by christ bior bi caitie ahad n R min eloiie atlin noil cand bloth cr biml ad unto lii ili KC atul their bloats be one 11 null eath sult 19 5 mark lut 10 6 lph 5 11 ai the book of morin 0 a iti his histon atory tov shows th nt at M I 1 lien lelii find ins tariff ly IT left their lind a lid lit 1110 of god the they bent out prepared prep ired to ice keep hii command lehi and ami hn sous sont anil M having lit ving ww alfa each ciklin nul BIA that only here are three iuna when goil god hiis has prop propped oed to 1 io plo or ite lep euple people a tu twice ice the coo eaith tb anil oine a 1 distant lant land from froin the old world ind and cach time lie shows the pattern to lie be one mani out woman one hus lm jone wife ain alei only oue one flesh the lorl stated to ezra era thayer anil till foitl Noil hrop arop sweet October 1830 that the B hook too kor mormon and the life holy scriptures warr for I 1 lie instruction 0 of lna its people D it gi ca p F bios liverpool edition 1854 t I 1 in it section 0 2 of tile mine carime work the lord states tant lite book of mor arion crion colita ins iiii tile ilic falness of the gopel of jesus christ to the gentili 3 nod nal to the ilia jews also uh h livas gisen by inper t tion its f I 1 in n section i 4 I 1 8 itis it is red that Ix canse bariff I 1 of light io tit fecat it cat talent of 3 that hall been received co ra dastol stol upon the lie church the lan 1 13 olo ni follows I 1 a ud this upon lite hie chialdi ell gotzion enu under tills until they repent anil and remember the I 1 a co I 1 iton creven ibe hie look hook tt tf Ifo relon ka tile llie N aich I 1 have gas ean ell the tit nul not only to a finy ay but to do ac cording to that 1 I 1 eh I 1 have written that they I 1 nifty bils Us ing bolth nut flint title tor for their kingdom Icing dom oth otherwise emise here a a scourge and ami a judgment to be 10 polled out mt upon tile llie chialdi en ell of 1 zion for or ho of it alic chakin KinK doull doin dollma iny holyland holy lind acil scilly ly 1 I sa tay unto yen van nay edition Lili tion the ditc ile of tle the revelation irr ie froni from chich li icci this is ig quoted cf ii given iu its 1833 1832 going back to find nil souie ot of the llie former inputs we discover tile the follow iii thou halt ailt love thy wife with til ill till heart and halt cleave unto hr ht r an 1 l none eke eldor arcati piatt stated in hi it alas course di in the Taber incle nt at salt lale lake city october hichi was iva publish etl ill fonn jn ili the car birly I 1 rise hiie if af this thia church 1831 god gave iva a coni iiii to its inon ibers st s at lie says thrall love thy wife with ill all thy bicart he rt unit cleave onto lice her and none atre it 11 ww gioco in ill 1831 when the oile one is eife ife sy system feni prevailed nation dinong tills people lit ill mooch fol following follon loning iii t tin 11 v ord of the ilia loril lord crime gli hie if 11 same mail is as follows and aeto I 1 isay say auto acau that choso whoso forbid deth 7 to elarry la is not ordained of p goil goal for or Is old lined tined goll lor for ali lesson it is banfill lio lie should huo ilia one colic wife food I 1 lacy knain abill bo be one hebb ll li land all tills ahat tile cantio anan er tho the end of 0 ais ll 11 creation and that it be k filled with lie 1110 Ilens loc of if num noun coidin ne e t to 0 its creation before tile is orld ii as these aie odthe oe the fonner metals menta tie dibie gard of chich a brought brou glit the fact that the ie wu was given to mail luen about to visit tile the shakers which boily body forbade to ina mn irr does not prove that hint nhat aliat liat is is i not to I 1 iw W 11 in 0 o ici cibil elise aai Ai TIit ait is 1 still 11 I 1 bonishing oni toni slung shing that I 1 on oil can call so loo glibly alb dis pose bosc of its pio liioi isio 14 it is ii lawful lIt |