OCR Text |
Show EOUItTll D1ST1U.CT. PROCEEDINGS 1M THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT. - vH Decree In Carter Caso Now Cases -Filed Prob.ito C,isc9 Considered - 1 'J Answer lo Martlu Cnso Filel. SATUUDAT. 'H In tho dlvoix'e cafe of Mao Carter vs. IMmiiiid Civrter, previously heard, the court, era tiled a divorce to the plaintiff. with tho custody of minor children, tlm lioiuo, tillniony of $25 per month pavuldu before the 15th of uuch .month , and 125 uttoruey's fees, ' .H In tho (II voice case of Isnra IIugliFi vs. lieu ry Hughes, demurrer of plain- jH tiff to cross-complaint was sustained and defcmlaut given ten days to amend, In the mutter of iho clnteof Samuel 'H A. Wilcox, deceased, Daniel Berry, Ll-ander Berry and Ell Bennett wuro appointed appraisers. jH UONlAY. In llio matter nf the estnto of James ' jH P.Carler, deceased, . board tiy.tbo clerk, Hl Monday, November 28tii, was set , fur hearing potltluc for.prob.ito of wIL TUESDAY. Answer filed In divorce ease of ITcr-mau ITcr-mau S. Martin vs. Edith I. Martin. The answer denies the material iille- '4H gallons of plaintiff's complaint nnd reiterates the allegations In former complaint tiled by Mrs. Martin JDj-feudatit JDj-feudatit is represented by Warner & jH |