OCR Text |
Show SAY ATTORNEY'S FEES IN CASE ARE INVALID lalms for Mttui !.' fees aggregating Miuo. pieegntetl tu I lie ctly by attorneya fur the defendanta in Hie. ,m f Halt leak City against the Pleasant View Ir-rlgstlon Ir-rlgstlon compsny and lies other claim-ante claim-ante to water rights in Parlay's creek, ate mat valid end ihouM not be allowed, a.-ordlna t an opinion rendered the rlty commission vr.irni by K. H. sUcharda ""I Mnir. i.i , iMiu-et for ths After Halt taeaJiv wun It tight recently recent-ly for rights In Parleys uanon many of the water users who were nam 44 as defendants In the suit riled claims for attorneys' fn--. im the gtuuiM that tha -outrsct for tha exchange of watar entered en-tered Into betwern them and tha city prior to tha ault fxprea.lv provided that Halt Lea, should defend their light a Many yeara im tha city built tha flalt lake and Jordan canal to rarry Ita watar from ft ah lake and tha Jordan river, which it extended t the farmers who had rights to the watar In SJarl) creek It was later discovered that tha rlty had right to the Parley's rreak watar n ar and ahova thoaa acquired undar tha exchange contract, and ault waa brought agalnat tha Pleasant Valley irrigation ompany and othara to obtain thoaa , rtghta Tha city won. Tha appeal to the auprame court by tha defendants does not question tha Judgment se to watar righta. but la brought In an attempt to force the payment of attorney' fsss. ' |