Show n O a I t t II UT UTAH H LOSES SUIT UN IRRIGATION I 1 TT DISTRICT Action H n Brought by Attorney General Dismissed inri hin in hi ri n Weber Court j tr arts After r three successive complaints h had been fl fired fifed edin in the name of the I st stale tc of Utah D D. D. D McKay and I Iother other directors of the Weber county Irrigation district won their case case- casein in inthe inthe inthe the sec second nd district court at Ogden y ye yesterday when Judge George S. S Barker B entered a judgment dismissing the suit Considerable interest has b been ben en shown in the litigation throughout through through- OU out the state for the reason that it it- was the first action brought testing th the state state law governing organization lf irrigation districts he suit was was instituted early I in 1921 by U the state acting through Attorney G General Harvey H H. Cluff with A A. G. G Horn of Ogden as special counsel the state was named as plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff plain plain- tiff the attorney general Is said to permitting permitting permit- permit have declined to participate ting Ung a group of Weber county men mentS tS to use use the of the state and tol to j I h Have llave Ye the s suit It carried on by their I j Iown iown own counsel Tin In the case of ea each h of the three demurrers de demurrers de- de complaints complaints filed by the plaintiffs interposed by Richards and nd Mitchell of this city and George Hal Hal- Halverson verson erson of Ogden w were ro sustained by bythe bythe bythe the court Judge Barker sustained I Hi the final demurrer ten days ago and andi I i when no further amended complaint I IJ J was as i introduced yesterday he entered ah h order dismissing the case As a ar r result result of the dismissal th the district Is held to be legally organized under the state law so far as the decision of the district court is concerned |