Show NO DECISION YET IN SNOWS SNOW'S MOTION FOR FOR NONSUIT IN THE MORRISON S J When the te hearing of the Morrison- Morrison Snow mining suit was resumed before Judge Hall Hal this morning moring Arthur Brown continued his argument in support of his motion for a nonsuit The grounds urged by Mr Brown mainly are tre that the representations set setup setup setup up as having been been made by Snow to Morrison were not sufficient if false to authorize a rescission of the contract entered into Info between them I Also that It i has not been shown that the representations were false within the knowledge of Snow and that it was not shown that Morrison relied upon the statements alleged to have been made by Snow but to the contrary had the means of knowledge ore bore him and relied upon his own judgment The familiarity of Morrison with yie e property of the company and the means which he had a at t all times by bY which he could have informed himself as to what was being done were dwelt upon with emphasis both by Mr Brown and Mr Wilkins on on behalf of the defence The testimony of Justice G. G W. W Bartch of the Supreme court was the feature of yesterdays yesterday's proceedings Judge Bartch was called caled late In Inthe Inthe inthe the afternoon and i i his direct examination ex ex- which was conducted by Col Col Ellis Els was very short Judge Bartch testified in brief brier that in inthe inthe inthe the fall fali fal of 1 OO Snow talked to him about the Morrison property and asked him to take an interest Snow told him he said that if I he would go outto out outto outto to Nevada and look at the property he Snow would make him a present of 2500 shares the tile Judge to pay his own expenses on the trip and If he liked It I and desired to go in he would sell sel him 2500 shares hares at 2 cents per share Continuing Con Con- Judge Bartch said that he went to Nevada and decided softer er viewing the property that he would like an interest Snow then gave him 2500 shares and he purchased the additional at 2 cents per share as agreed upon Snow also told him he lie added that Judge had secured shar shares s on the same terms and that Dr Heard had purchased 2600 2000 shares and Judge Miner shares at the same price After the incorporation Judge Bartch said further he purchased purchased pur put chased some additional stock at 2 cents per share but he could not remember the amount Prior to July 12 1901 he said in conclusion an assessment of the mine was never talked about by the board of directors The examination cross cross of Judge Bartch was was conducted by Arthur Brown Brwn and was in substance and in part as follows When you first went in It i was un understood understood understood that you were to have 2500 shares of the stock given to you if you paid your ur expenses on the trip to the i mine er Yes I 1 I Did you pay your own ow ez Yes ex Snow didn't get you a tick J No p Now didn't Snow Sno m mNo No N he may have paid fot 1 o our meals ea pay Did YOu you tr travel vel on a pass No Tm You recollect buying a a aTo t t My Sty recollection is lp that I mileage ticket at Ogden Oden jj You had a livery lvery out there Yes K Did you pay for tor the livery I dont don't recollect that I didAt did didAt didAt At this point Judge Bartch his testimony by saying tha thai Snow walked over to them Humboldt a distance of five i that they had no livery lvery a aAs As a result of your visit you paid you got 2500 shar shares s c o Mr 11 Brown then asked M Yes was the reply I You dont don't know how mat man manof mat of stock you owned owne at t the e 1 owned the most Ml I dont don't recollect exactly b You have haye disposed of ot someI some someI someI I think my dau daughter g ts tsal all al in the family anyway anywaY You were a Judge Judge- of the court of the State te durin alth |