Show THE PAVING ami the point has been raised and we think unjustly that paving should be deferred until after the water wr ks are completed because tho lay ingin pipes to connect buildings w of mains will necessitate the up of the asphaltum asphalt nm sidewalk side walk more jr less if this be the only objection we think that it is no serious obstacle to the commencement of paving at once we look at it this way As long as prove is a city the same objection may bo raised and in twenty years from now the general work of pipe laying may exceed the introduction of the water system into aroyo now if the city grows as we hope for this will certainly be the case suppose that we do defer paving until after the water system is completed and water pipes lain across the sidewalk to furnish water will wo then have avoided tho evil of having tho sidewalk torn up we think not something may become the matter at most anytime with the pipes laid down such as stoppage breakage from freezing etc which may necessitate tho breaking ap of the sidewalks to remedy the evil then again why should property owneta feel so solicitous with regard to the ap of the sidewalks for tho introduction of water pipes T tho small expense connected with the repairs will be born by the provo water works company they are tho ones that should object to a pavement on the sidewalk and not owners because the expense falls on them you may rest aadu aasu red however that the water works company will never object they expect to meet such obstacles at all times if there is no other excuse for delaying paving than that we hare just discussed let us push matters by all means for we need a good pavement |