Show FIRST DISTRICT COURT the business transacted by judges and boreman BEFORE JUDGE nEX DERSON the arguments in the case of W P bennett vs M et al were concluded on tuesday afternoon and the matter taken under advisement by the court wednesday morning the case of sirs ruth kinsey administratrix against J C G glanfield camo on for trial the suit was brought by mrs kinsey for the recovery in behalf of the estate of the corner lot on which the hines drug store and other buildings now stand on centre street in this city valued at several thousand bollara do llara it appears that the property in dispute was purchased at public sale by mr glanfield for mr D H kinsey before the batters lat death in 1875 the widow sought several times to induce glanfield to give her a deed for the estate but during the seven years following mr Kin death she was unable to obtain it eacle time being told by glanfield that when sho was ready to sell he would give as much for the property as anybody else would during this period glanfield had collected rents from tenants and turned them over to the administratrix finally in 1582 glanfield om n d tu give iw for the property and she feeling at his mercy as she stated decided to accept the afler A year later the widow found among her deceased husbands papers a letter written by glanfield to kinsey before the batters lat death in which certain damaging facts hitherto kept from her knowledge were beet forth the widow in consequence of the admissions contained in the letter and in justice to her children thereupon decided to place the matter in the hands of her attorneys dickson and demand return of tle property which it is alleged had been fraudulently taken from the estate the case occupied the whole of wednesday and nearly all of thursday dickson mariaa acting as counsel for mrs kinsey aird mr J C royle for glanfield the case has been taken under advisement vi by the court and a decision will be anxiously looked for involving ag it does the ownership of some of the most valuable property in provo in the case of B G vs A K thornton et al an order was granted for postponement of hearing demurrer jacob killian was excused from jury service at this morning tho case of scott elliott vs geo C whitmore Whit etal et al involving the legal right and use of alio water running through grassy trail or little cottonwood creek in emery county was called up for trial C S varian acted as counsel for elliott and E D hoge for defendants JUDGE on tuesday afternoon noble wood co vs barr brown order granted for dismissal on motion of plaintiffs attorney kingston A 0 o vs barr brown same order charles K williams vs polly L williams it waa ordered that plaintiff pay defendant for attorneys fees 50 and 50 for witnesses and 10 per month pending euit for alimony christensen vs jena christeneen order granting divorce alie case of fillmore city vs gabriel huntsman came up for trial on wednesday morning sheeks rillina and W II 11 diug appearing as counsel for the plaintiffs and thurman A sutherland and judge emerson for defendant this suit is to restrain huntsman from further constructing a mill stream to the injury of alie public irrigation ditch alie case of fillmore vs G huntsman is still in progress |