Show STABCONSOLIDATED SUIT I Irvine and Lawrence Settle Their Differences In the case of AV I Jrvlnc vs W J Lawrence judgment was yesterday entered en-tered for the defendant by consent on tho second cause of action and the first causo of action was settled and dismissed j dis-missed The second cause of action was to recover M70 on a promissory note secured by 1666 shares of stock of the Star Consolidated Mining company Thu plaintiff disposed of tho stock and applied the proceeds on the note long ago when the sloe was at a much higher prlco than It now Is The first I cause of action was on an option on 10000 shares of the tame stock given by Lawrence lo Irvine and the hitler In his complaint alleged that Law rance had failed to make good this option and Irvine claimed 163 as damage The litigants howe veil i arrived ar-rived at an agreement which resulted in the dismissal of that cause of action ac-tion tOI I |