Show Implement Company Answers k Farmlngton March iTAn answer was filed today In the ease of Charles Digger et al vs lbs roncolldaled Implomont r company of Salt Lulto In vhlch tIm allegation V al-legation of the complaint that a contract 1 WaS enttrrd Into between the parties for 1 the walo of crrlaln brickmalting machinery t machin-ery IP admitted but thin answer allegos that plaintiffs broko tho conlnict nnd the I V machinery reverted to Iefrndiiifls A frosscomplaint accompanies the ansWer In which 5950 damngoa In clalmol lie V nmount repro entlug UK defendants loas bv renpon of the contract being annulled V an-nulled j |