Show BESTS WITH STATE I U S Supreme Court Passes I on Quarantine Case t I I I THE ACTION IS DISMISSED I Application of Former Treasurer of Error I Bollin of Omaha for a Writ to Nebraska Supreme Court in Matter of His Conviction for Embezzlement Em-bezzlement was Denied by the Fed I oral Supreme Court and Opinion of I State Court is FvCafflrmed Another 1 I An-other Naval Prize Case Decided I f I 1 I Washington Jan 15Tfl the 1nit d Slates Supreme court today Justiie I Brown rendered an opinion In the case of Henry Bollin vs tho Slate of Nebraska Ne-braska on appllcallon made by Rollln for a writ of error lo the Nebraska Supreme Su-preme court In the matter of the conviction con-viction of Bollin former City Treasurer of Omaha of the crime of embezzlement embezzle-ment The opinion refused Bolllns ap j plication reafllrmlng the opinion of the State eourt and alllrmlng the eonsll tutinnalltj of the Nebraska law providing pro-viding for proceeding In criminal cases upon Information processes QUARANTINE AGAINST A STATE The Lnlted States Supreme court dismissed dis-missed the null of the Stale of Louisiana Loui-siana vs the Slate of Texas and Its health otllee involving the right of the latter Stale to quarantine so rigorously I against the former as was done during f the t rerenl prevalence of yellow fever In New Orleans Junllcf Fuller handed down the opinion of the court I DFM TURKU SUSTAINED The bill In tIme case as filed l I by the I I Stale of Texas alleges that the Texas I quarantine was so strict as to phu an embargo em all I Interstate commerce h 1 Hvern tin city of New Orleans and the Stair of Texas the effect being lo benefit the commen of lalveslem and of other l Texas cities at the expense of I the commcree of New Orlans It was averred that thlu prohibition I was In lo liitlon of the Ionslllullon of the United States especially of the clause regulating regulat-ing I Intel I state commerce The bill asked for an enjoining order The eaRl was htard on a demurrer 181101 rig that the Supreme court had no Jurisdiction III the case This demurrer was smi stud 101 hy i Chief Justice Fullers opinion As to the responsibility i of the Texas health I ofllclnls time court declined I 10 I assume as-sume responsibility saying such responsibility re-sponsibility I I rested with I the Stale NAVAL Pll1ZI MON1SY < ASI5 The court today decided another of ho I naval prize money CISOH growing out of the I raplure of vessels during Ihe blockade ot i f Havana In the war with Spain The ease was appealed from the t derision of the Circuit com l of South Carolina the vessel Involved I being Ihe Newfoundland The decision deci-sion of the lower court was reversed the Supreme court holding that the actions of the Newfoundland11 I wore suspicious enough to Justify seizure but I not to I I wairant forfeiture i Tho restoration of tIme vessel 1 lo Its owner was therefore ordered bit t without I I damages or costs l SlTSTAliSS KANSAS LAS I Tile court decided the case of S 31 H Ilark and others receivers of the I Union Pacific Railroad company vs the city of Kansas Kan The case involved I in-volved the constitutionality I of the Kansas law authorizing cities to extend ex-tend their borders so as to Include some lands and nol others The opinion rendered today sustained the law ufllrmincr the opinion of the Supreme court of Kansas |