Show iL BAEZS APPEAL DENIED U S Supreme Court Refusoe LOOVO i 4 to Pile Petition d Wiuhlngton April 1Thi Supreme court tixlny d heiiIed laW to file the ie rinI lltl m of Ramon Raex eftlmen of For ii lo HI ii for writs of habe corpus and ccrtlurill I In tb 1rMcqhhiIg agnlnut him m f l 1n 1 Hi TVrli lt in J f I 1 tI l Il I I j 11i t > v I T I i < iV T 1 I li C A I K H i tice who made a brief explanation of till courts attitude The court did not enter at all upon the question of Jurisdiction Juris-diction or deride any of the more Important Im-portant points raised by the petition Tie Chief Justice said in his explanation explana-tion that the application was not made lo the court until March 2Cth on the eve of a two weeks recess This delay was ho said in the face of the fact that Bacz had from December lllh to apply for relief Because of this delay ho said the courts Interposlllon would have been unavailing if It had taken Jurisdiction If the writ of habeas eor pur had been Issued April 9th Iho next court day after the petition was pro I sentcd the imprisonment would have expired six days aflorwnrd and four lecn days before the person having him In custody would be required to make his return Thus before the case could be heard upon the writ and return the prisoner would he no longer In custody He stated In conclusion that the court was not to be understood aa Intimating In any degree an opinion on the question ques-tion of Jurisdiction or oilier questions raised by the petition |