OCR Text |
Show FOOD FOR THE JURY. Judge Anderson Takes Up the Docket and Prepares a Big Layout for die Lawyers. THE GRIND ON MONDAY NEXT. Cases of Varying Nature and Interest Thstt Are to be Put Cpon Their .Merits During a Kun of Two Straight Weeks Judge Anderson took up the docket where Judge Zaue left off this morning and on Monday next the two branches will run parallel par-allel with each other on jury trials. The bar was largely represented, the planets chuckling over a lucrative following, those of the lesser magnitude who, in the call always f.nd themselves surrounded by more or less embarrassment putting their hands in their pockets and trusting to the wheel of fate for better luck. Judge Anderson made the following settings which begin on Monday next and continue until and including the 29th day of April, MONDAY, APRIL 11. 186 Frank Stephens vs the Union Pacific Railway company. 151 L'tah Stove and Hardware company vs Elithorpe Air Brake company. 5a- Sarah Sloan vs Marcus Metz et ai. TI ESDAY, APRIL 12. 352 State Bauk of Utah vs Wm. R. Southwell South-well et al. 37S Atchison National bauk. 'Mo J. Metras vs B. Kaiatofsky. WEDNESDAY, APRIL 13. Sil B. Devine vs D. Burns et al. 345 Eliza Hbson v:- John L. W'eher et al. 340 M. Beck vs M. Rutherford. THURSDAY, APRIL 14. y KJ0 JOS. Duckworth vs Salt Lake City Railway company. 221 Jos. Duckworth, administrator, vs Salt Lake City Railwav company. 337 Sarah J. Bevy vs E. H. Parsons. FRIDAY, APRIL 15. 175Wm. H. Roy vs Orson II. Petitt et al. 17'J Orson H. Petitt vs E. H. Parsons. 332 S. F. Feou et al vs B. W. Driggs, jr. MONDAV, APRIL lti. 236 R. B. Carter vs; Melvja Hoeker et al. 155 Alice J. Jones vs. O. S. L. and U. N. R. R. Co. y3 Jno. tr. Linderberg vs. Crescent Manufacturing Manu-facturing Co. TUESDAY, APRIL 10. 20O A. F. Lawsou vs. Alfred Thompson. ISO Henry Lichtensteiu vs. I. Walters. 327 Geo. C. Armstrong vs. O. S. L. and U. N. R. R. Co. WKDN'EsDAY, APRIL 20. 323 John Strickley et al. vs. Peter Clays et al. 375 W. S. Howlaud et al. vs. S. H. Con-lev. Con-lev. 382 M. Rush Warner, administrator vs. U. S. Mutual Accident association. THURSDAY, PRII. 21. 324 J. II. Berryman vs Frank Hoffman et al. 328 Samuel Ewbank vs. Union Pacific Railway Co. 358 Marie Br nil lard et al. vs. J. W. Hamm. FRIDAY, APRII. 22. 176 A. J. Stark & Co. vs. E. C. De Witt. 306 C. M. Hammond vs. Thos. I. Preece. 3.-0 G. H. Williams vs. C. M. Brown et al MONDAY, APRIL 25. 219 Geo. Everett vs. O. S. L. and U. N. R. R. Co. 203 Jno. L. Lind-ay vs. W. U. Telegraph Co. :;3-t Richard Evans vs. Northern Spring Manufacturing Co. TUfeSDAT APRIL 26. 305 Hugh Anderson administrator, vs William Showell. 364 II. E. Wheeler vs James W. Campbell. Camp-bell. 3(35 E. A. Morgan vs Jas. W. Campbell. WEDNESDAY APRIL 27. 357 Amos Feustermaker vs Tribune Publish Pub-lish ing company. 368 Adan Duncan vs W. H. H. Spafford et al. 374 W. G. Shannon vs W. A. Showell et al. THURSDAY APRIL 28. 246 M. Beck vs M. Rutherford et al. 344 Mary Anna Hadley vs U. P. railway company. 354 C. L, Lanford as F. J. Drake et al. FRIDAY APRIL 29. 240 Geo W. Crosier et al vs Otheru P. Pratt et al. s 325 Marv Lafette vs Wm S. Martin. 355John W. White vs ). S. L. U. X. railway rail-way company. Court Notes. The refunding of illegally collected school taxes goes on without interruption. James Hcnnepsher has obtained a decree of separation from Klizabelh Hennepsher, who abandoned him. A decree of divorce was granted yesterday yester-day in the case of William Pickering vs. Elizabeth Pickering, on the ground of abandonment. aban-donment. The following persons have been admitted to citizenship: Fred Neilson, James Larson, Lar-son, C. A. Larson and J. M. Bergesen, natives na-tives of Denmark; Edward Small, H. S. Edward, natives of England; A. O. Schow, Lars Larsen, Carl Erickson, Anders Anderson, Ander-son, natives of reden. The Northland-Mayflower case was resumed re-sumed this morning, at which time the plaintiffs begun their rebuttal. In admon ishing the jury la-t evening Judge Zane called attention to the fragmentary reports of the evidence in the morning papers and the glaring headlines that have each day sought with ominous persistency to fii a verdict in a case that involves fabubous ri' hcs. "You are not to be guided by them," exclaimed the court. "If you are you go from this courtroom as perjurers and should go to the penitentiary. The reporters have, inadvertently perhaps, expressed opinions : which I believe improper." I |