OCR Text |
Show A COMEDY IN tOIIf. The LuminRribi of the Lcoal Bar Engage in a Vocal Alteration that Excite the Eisebltji of the Audionce, CHA3. ELAZES GET3 A HEW TEIAL. The Tribune Libel Suit Coram op on a Demurrer Which is Overruled Digest of the Dock-it. It wa dillieult to determine thi morning whether the spectators recog-nied recog-nied tiie priforiuau,!e that rose under tho title o( 1'. S. lionesteel vs. C. S. Ford and Charles I,. Ford manager, of the Frankliu Avenue theater as an act In comedy of tragedy. Laughter and passion alternated so rapidly that it might have been decided a compound of Poll). The action is one in which the plaintiff seeks to recover from Ford ft Crane $'.i'.!'J5 which elm alleges is due heron an advance that enabled them to robe and start the tickle guddess ol imitation on her road to fame end fortune. for-tune. In her complaint she avei that the defendants were guilty of lraud iu obtaining the money and that she or her husband was to bd made cashier of the thealer until the receipt of the ticket ollico anil wiuu room reimbursed re-imbursed them. On the other hand Ford it Crane came back with the ehui'iro that it is a plain caso of blackmail black-mail and an effort on the part of Mr. JkiiiHKicel to extort from them the amount prayed for and which the plaintiff seeks to collect through an attachment. at-tachment. In the revival of the issue thin morning upon the motion to dissolve dis-solve the attachment S. S. Markham, counsel for plaintiff, stated that the matter had already been exposed to the lic;ht of Judie Anderson's wisdom niui that the essential questions were submitted to hint. During tho progress of this dialogue Lawyer Nebraska Cyclone Ile.lly's blood began to boil. His physiognomy physiog-nomy was mantled by the. llu.h of an honest plowu.au on a July day, and replying to the assertion he slated that they constituted as brazen a tilm.hnod as he had ever heard from the lips of a l'iwyer- Tho talent that was seated iu the railing wus unable to suppress iis risibles, w hilo the court ils. if had Io smile as ho summed up In rather novel situatiou. A New Trial Oranteil. The caso of the people against C. L. Illazor, recently convicted of obtaining money under false pretenses, wa before Judge Zaon again tins in .ruing, on a motion for a new trial, which was allowed, the defendant makingalli-davit makingalli-davit to the fact that ho had unearthed a witness, one Frank Kinurinan, secretary sec-retary of the Don Carlos Lumber company, com-pany, who would testily that said company com-pany lit the time the dr.tfis were made was a solvent iusliuiiion and indebted to him in au amount thai would cover said drafts, which Imd been sckuowl-edrd sckuowl-edrd litit which, he contends, were never finally presented for payment. Counter ailidavits wero Introduced by I .C F.ichnor, csij., representing the prosecution, which et tip 'hat it was never known that Frank Kingman was an official of thd Dou C.iili J Lumber company, but that one llalstead was lh secretary. 'J hat hinpiiiaii had uot, been with the company iuce November No-vember or December last ami that he w:s not financially responsible. S tlliatn O. Try lor manager of Brads' Brad-s' ruett commercial agency made afli-uavit afli-uavit that he knew Blazer a the manager mana-ger of the "so-called" company but had never known such a man as Frauk Kingman in connection with the so-called so-called Don Carlos Lumber company. The court ruling upon the ailidavits stated that it was inclined to think that under the circumstances tho defendant was entitled to another hearing and a new trial was ordered, the bond being permitted to remain at 1 1000. ftliort Unlet. The following other orders were made by the court; Remington, Johnson it Co. vs. S. M. Tree, attachment dismissed aud case dismissed without prejudice. Amos Fersterniaker vs. the Tribune. publishing Co; demurrer overrulod aud ten days allowed in which to answer. The action is one which the plaintiff seek to recover on the grounds of alleged libel damages in the sum of $Jl),O00. The defendant having published pub-lished that the plaintiff had turned a waif out on the plains to die. Harriet Lewis vs. George O. Noble ct al; default and docreo of foreclosure. foreclo-sure. Harriet Lewis vs. George O. Noble et al.; same order. D. 15. Lacks vs. Frank S. Green et al.; decree granted. George H. Church vs. William K. Ryan; it was ordered that service be made by publication. S. Sorenson vs. ',. Wood; judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $470.94. t'eurt Notea. The referees report on tho North Jordan Irrigation company vs Mary Krickson will be heard on Saturday next. The evidence was closed in the Him-ilton-Dooley case yesterday and arguments argu-ments will" follow on Monday at 10 o'clock. Alfred Jackson who was convicted of bigamy in February last and sentenced to six months in the peuitentiary was released lust evening. Messrs. Henry W. Lawrence, H. C. Lett and II. 1'. Kelsey were appointed commissioners to appraise property in the case of Salt Lake City vs Ann E liner. Charles Thied of Murray was convicted con-victed of selling liquor on the Sabbath and the prosecution threatens to result in wholesale prosecution. Tho friends of Thiod contend that it was going a long way out of town for the "hideous example," and declare their intention of tiiing complaint ngsinst a score of gin mills which they claim have been guilty of open violation. |