Show IDAHO SUPREME COURT two decisions of int interact erat to people of 0 that S etc NC CIAL dols e ida april apri I 1 0 6 o the supreme court loda harikal dov doan ri sonie come lepor truit decisions lot in north idaho cases in the case of the tb state stale 9 vary mary a editor the action ol of the iho homr court in refusing I 1 to malfi an order requiring the iho i bounty to H pay the fees for cor the defon doi was sus EU tab w T to 0 den tItle the alti to lo the benefit benec e f 1 L of 0 t ahr h e p ro v 1 s 1 0 n s ot of se e t io n S sial L U 0 C t the il e ne 1 se i S SlA t A t lutri u t L s am c n d e d b by t th he beer ion latts las of wa says the court there must be 0 a strict conil ilance with the pro provisions iskols ot of eald section and thu the c sll 11 and or 0 ucal wit wi t nases must te be shown before a a aub ab boena poena will be lenued or any expense char bablo to tile the county I 1 tho the defendant in this caie cage who was on n t ti lal jai in or borce erce county for fop mur der and was acquitted hail had refused to 9 sliwa I 1 w the ot of tho the witnesses ot of deal alfred red the lower court was reversed in the case ot of T R rourke Roi irhe appia ant vs louls ioula I oula ut B rgelio involving the question ot of the tha priority ot of laborers liens lien over a mortgage bergevin Bergev ln borrowed f ont the plaintiff and to secure him executed executed a chattel mortgage inor teaRe on the wheat crop on acoca of land in NOB nea perce county the lower court gave the plaintiff judgment Jud Kment under foreclosure but directed that out of the pro ceodes thy the the labor ri ra a he bald fairst toll act acison on of the court the supreme court decides was wa error |