Show NO earth receiving chamber arranged 11 atone at one end of the sluice box and communicating directly therewith a furnace arranged at the end of the box opposite the earth receiving humber chamber and having I 1 a hue flue connection with the latter a wash washing ing 11 screen located within the open earth receiving chamber and ex posed directly to the water within the sluice box an elevated sluiceway sluice way anda and a conveyor arran arranged I 1 cred to work in tb the d sluice box and so propelled as to impart impulses to the water in a direction toward the screen for wa washing sh the contents of the latter composition of matter for furnace linings or other purposes no rudolf keck of denver colo the herein described artificial intone con consisting cr of a material and a binder of flux consisting e of the material of the shale constantly occurring in th the e jura along 11 the eastern foothills of the rocky mountains said stone being porous and a bad conductor of heat centrifugal apparatus for casting no F frans rans gustaf stockholm sweden A centrifugal apparatus for casting 11 ingots ingols comaris ng a tilting z support a rotary mold journ aled in said support and having an extended operating shaft a wheel operatively connected with said shaft and arranged to tilt therewith and a plurality of independent driving wheels arranged in different positions said wheel on the tilting support being adapted to separ sepal LATEST MINIM DECISIONS prepared forThe for the mining review by george taves tave lf attorney kt ux at law S 41 C ia k cit city Y utah miners liners N lien where the bovi ovi dence failed to show that a mine was bein being Z worked I 1 under a contract by which C was in any way liable for the labor performed or ma material frial f funi j dished ed but learly established stai that it was being operated by two othe others rs under a recorded lease in which C had no interest and such labor etc were furnished for their exclusive use and benefit C s interest in the mine was not subject to a lien though he owned a one fourth interest in the mine and was coun cognizant izant of the work and to some extent while employed as bookkeeper for the lessels lessees les sees took part in its direction in their absence and 11 gave orders for merchandise in their name but failed to notify the parties dealing with them of his true re relation latiol 1 davidson david son vs jennings CO 60 pac colo T mining partnership wh what it constitutes grub staking shakina t chiv code 2511 provides that a mining partnership exists between tn two vo or more persons who own or acquire a mining mining atil A 0 N oo 00 W jo NO claim for or the purpose of working it and actually engage engage in working the same chiv code 2395 defines a partnership to be the assoria of two or more persons to carry carry on business to together mether and divide the profits plaintiffs furnished defendant means with which thich to go to alaska to locate mining claims defendant agreed that plaintiffs should have an undivided one half of all mining claims located to together oether with one half net proceeds of all minerals mined after the first year it was also agreed cr that in case defendant discovered any valuable claims he should lotif notify v plaintiffs and they should thereupon go to the place where defendant had located said claims and assist in working them they to furnish one half the labor and expense thereof and said plaintiffs to be owners of an undivided one half of any claims so located and to have one half the minerals mined irined held that though 11 the contract mav may have contemplated the formation in the future of a mining partnership it did not constitute a partnership co which commenced on defendants starting for alaska so is as to entitle plaintiffs to an accounting where defendant refused to let plaintiffs work claims discovered by him prince vs lamb copac 11 cal same sufficiency of consideration in an action by one who has furnished another money as a grubstake grub 1 ru stake to go r cro to alaska to locate mining z cl claims ainis for specific performance of an agreement that the party furnishing the funds should be entitled to one half the claims located where the expense of the trip ignot is shown the court will take judicial notice that 50 is not an adequate consideration to entitle plaintiffs P plaintiffs to specific performance of a contract 0 iving ivine him one half the fruits of so toilsome 0 0 and expensive a journey and the expense of lo locating catina 21 claims ibid |