Show RE RECENT CENT MINING DECISIONS prior locators locator q water anter nighta the I 1 io or cator of a placer mining claim notwithstanding his failure to record his location notice within the time prescribed by alv code acquired not only a right of possession which he did not forfeit merely because of his neglect to make a timely record but also alcoa a location which it if imperfect was nevertheless erth eless superior to any other location on the same ground that others might subs suase e have attempted to make his right to use water reasonably necessary for beneficial use on his claim being superior to any rights in others to ta use the water on their subsequently located claims on the public domain lying farther up the gulch dripps v alli sons mines co district court of appeal california pacific good recorded certificate of location though Erro erroneous neotis certificate of location ol of a mining claim recorded in due time and tor for more than a year before attempted location of another conflicting claim was notice to locators of such other claim of the dimensions of the first claim properly staked out on the ground though there was an error in the description of the clairn claim in the posted notice at the discovery shaft courtney V ward supreme court of colorado pa ja cefic liable for unguarded slope an open unguarded in a dark aban dolled mining tunnel connected with a new ne tunnel with a track for small push cat cars s leu left outside of the tunnels unfastened and nuis u closed held to constitute an attractive for ance rendering the mine owner liable into t the death of a boy 11 years old wa who to fell faylor ini the abw the ie while playing on the cars dil u 5 co v great eastern quicksilver mining pacific IS 18 7 brict court of appeals california |