Show RECENT MINING DECISIONS income tax on mining companies Compan lex mining companies canles nied Pan les and their stockholders are not delea the equal protection of the laws nor deprived of 01 of their property without due process law aw contrary to U S const ath amend by of dy 1 the inc income 0 me tax provisions of the tariff act 16 october 3 1913 38 stat at L chap under chieh the deduction permitted for relation on arising from depletion of ore deposits value is limited 11 united to 5 per cent of the gross year alue at the mine of the output during the which other individuals and eions corpora corpord have ave the right to deduct a a fair and rea tion r for losses and detrecia court coi t stanton stan tn v baltic mining co supreme of the united states 26 sup ct rep ani ing C gainin As the terms lodes veins ledge 0 85 s are use used d ln in the t acts of congress regard to mines and mining claims it was waa genetic rena intended tended to make distinctions based upon occur prin ciple but when precious metals subsequent bubla in tilt toted ed beds ln in places associated with are fissuring and they within subject ct to location tia tion as veins and lodes mining the J waning meaning of said acts alameda court couett 1 of co laah idaho 0 v success mining co supreme 0 pacina n lUr 1 th Tha thab 0 1 for injury b by y smelter smoke injure 1111 rell of images damages to growing cros difference itt terAn by 7 1 smelter smoke and fumes is the crop croo that ca between the market value of the but butan for would probably have been ra raised place 1 l the le sm smoke moke at the neared nearest time ie and ft aeS when lt it had ad a market val and the the value BOC of the crop actually illy raised less aesa expense and labor bor which b eason of nf was saved by y veri the injury amer sm K ref co v court cou fl daiev of Dal rv stock farm U S circuit appeals 23 6 federal |