Show RECENT IRE CE NT MINING DECISIONS prepared for the Af mining filing review animal into shaft the owner of a mining claim is not liable to the owner of live stock for damage resulting from live stock running at large falling into a pit prospect liole hole or mining shaft left open by the miner and the lo lomuti euti or oi owner of min in ibur illers 1 iiii ir if li i L denef r the sanie same in order to protect live stock running at large on 01 the public domain from being injured by f falling alling into the same strong vs brown supreme court of idaho 1 ao pacific risk admiel Asni ned py hy miner while a miner must use seasonable lea anable care for ills his own safety lie he does docs not ahsu assume me the risk of a hidden danger cr created bated in ills his place of employment by other e employees over whom lie he has no control and of ahl which h he has no warning or notice so that r n miner would not assume the risk of injury from dri drilling 11 ing into an unexploded hole left in that condition by a previous shift of wol workmen limen of which lie he had no notice peterson vs pittsburg arg silver er peak gold mining co supreme C ourt court of nevada pacific relocation notice where the owner of ft a mining claim abandoned part of it his relocation of smother another clairn claim which included part of the abandoned claim is good it not appearing that the abandonment was with adv fraudulent purpose under the statute reri requiring the ne locator to post at the point plain sign or notice a location of ais discovery covery a notice written on a piece of white paper placed on a slick ind and partly covered by a rook lc to prevent i it from blowing away cannot as a matter in titter of law be held insufficient vs akin court of appeals of colorado pacific |