Show REGENT MINING DECISIONS prepared for the mining review agreement between mine owners not to employ members of labor organizations an agreement between mine mina operators that they will not employ any person who belongs to a certain labor organization or to any organization affiliating therewith does not constitute an unlawful conspiracy against such organization or its members goldfield consolidated mines co v goldfield miners union no U S circuit court district of nevada fed right to operate mine I the right to operate a mine and to carry on the business of mining therein is a property right whether ona owns the mine or not and he may invoke the powers of a court of equity to protect such right in a proper case even though he is not the owner of the mine or even a stockholder in the company which does own it goldfield consolidated mines co v goldfield miners union no U S circuit court district of nevada fed liabilities incident to working mines in an action by a grantee of the surface holding under deeds reserving the minerals with a right to mine by means of underground workings against the grantee of the rights reserved under conveyances from the same grantor for injuries caused by mining operations to improvements on plaintiffs land evidence held not to show that defendant caused or contributed to the injury complained of defeating a recovery whether plaintiff under the deeds is entitled to an absolute right to subjacent and lateral support to the surface or whether he has no right to complain of any injury except as results from want of ordinary care in the conduct of mining operations knipe v anaconda copper mining co supreme court of montana 95 pac partition of mining P property rope arty though since mining property as a rule is not susceptible cep tible to division and partition thereof must generally result in its sale such property may not only be divided among the owners in proportion to their respective interests te rests but under the express terms of alaska codes pt 4 see sec it must be so divided unless it appears that a partition thereof cannot be made without great prejudice to the owners manley v boone U S circuit court of appeals fed right of purchaser to dispute title to claims plaintiffs and a third person discovered and denounced under the laws of mexico two mining claims which were surveyed and monuments erected and for which patents were issued there was a variance between the ground conveyed by the patents and the ground intended to be denounced defendants contracted to purchase the claims and on discovering the variance denounced claims covering the territory intended to be included by plain tiffs miffs and the third person in their claims defendants were not guilty of actual fraud held that defendants were not because of the contract to purchase es topped from acquiring title to the property adversely to plaintiffs and equity could not impress on the property a trust in favor of plaintiffs butterfield v nogales copper co supreme court of arizona 95 pac possession of claim by purchaser where no actual possession was taken by a purchaser in a contract to purchase mining claims not described by metes and bounds the purchaser was not in constructive possession of the ground claimed by the vendor under his original location and not included within the patents to the claims as one may not be constructively in possession of property not falling within the description of some of title held by him butterfield v nogales copper co supreme court of arizona 95 pac |