Show TWO DECISIONS RENDERED F P Garcia Co Have No Cause of Action in Case Originating in City Court Two decisions were handed down by b the supreme court yesterday In the case of ofA ofA I A R B C Smith appellant against Gideon Alvord respondent the opinion which is written by Judge Frick and concurred In by the other members of the supreme bench sustains and confirms the decision and judgment of the district court Smith asked for an Injunction against Alvord to prohibit trespassing on Smiths land and asking for damages The injunction was denied The supreme decided the case of ofF ofF ofF F Garcia Co appellant against John JohnP P Free and Susie Free respondents In favor of the defendants by b dismissing the Garcia secured judgment In the city court for and this judgment was reversed by the district court on appeal filed flied by b Free The district court held that Garcia had no cause of action Free moved moed the dismissal of the appeal on the ground that there was no cause Ruse of action and that the case was not ap The statutes specify that cases originating nat ing In the city court and appealed to the district court may bo be appealed to the su supreme supreme supreme preme court when the Judgment rendered is for more than 1000 Free contended that in this case the Judgment was not for tor money but was merely a decision as asto asto asto to whether there was a cause of action and which held that there was no cause of action Garcia claimed that the statute meant that a case could be appealed when the amount in litigation exceeded exceed d The supreme court dismissed the ap appeal appeal appeal peal and held that the amount involved in the litigation had no bearing on the of the case but that the amount of judgment rendered would have been the cause of appeal had judgment been given for more than |