Show TREEL COURTS IN SESSION Yesterday Was the Busy Day of Ogden Lawyers There were three courts in sessIon yesterday in Ogden and every nember of the bar in this city was in active service side by side wIth numerous of their fellows from Salt Lake The fed emil court began its sqssion iptlse courtrooms court-rooms in the Utah National Bank build lag Judge Rolapp took up his law and motion calendar and Judge Josnson was on the bench hearing the case of the Marriott Irrigation company vs the Bear River Irrigation Ogden Waterworks company at al This case alone brings in directly or otherwise IsaIf the people and nearly every attorney in the county and that sets the company defendants at cross purposes with their fellow defendants rho labyrinth of motions demurjers coaiplaints and crosscomplaints in the action is such as to require an exptrt to determine the status of the various litigants The distinction betweea plaintiffs and defendants is one chiefly in name as the various defendants were demurring and crosscomplaining against one another The issues in the case have hoisever been joined and trial will begin March 27 as the final order of Judge Jolsnson settled the pleadings and set the case for tisat date I3OREMAN WON OUT Of spebial interest to attorneys isa the decision of Judge Ttoletpp in the teat case of Ogden City vs G F Bore man Mr Borqman for the purpose of testing the license ordinance as affect log attorneys resisted the collection of the license By stipulation he teas tried in police court and a nominal fine tin posed Judge Rolapp heil thsat aCtor neys derive their authority to ptacttee from the state and the privilege cannot be curtailed by city ordinance so the decision of the lowat court wits reversed re-versed and the defendant ordered released re-leased FEDERAL COURT in the federal court Judge Marshall was on the bench and after disposing of tile business took a recess tilt lIon day next The cases of D P Williams vs Ly man Skeen J A Tayior William Skeen B II Robinson James Martin L N Shurtliuf and Dudley Chase vs William Adameon et at receivers were set for hearing Tuesday March 14 George McCormick E T Htllaniskt and H A Tart were admitted to practice prac-tice The bankruptcy case of E J Hoe rocks was set for hearing at 2 p m Monday The Strawberry ralley Cattle company com-pany vs John Cummings motiox for leave to ansend complaint was by consent con-sent passed to next day William Levy vs A Tv McCuae tIe murrer to complaint passdd for hearing hear-ing until next rule day A V Mackintosh vs North AmexS can Savings Loan Building comslny was called for heating on mottqx to dismiss made by plaintiff Argucnts wero mado by E 1Sf Allison and by II L Ritchie trite presented a petition of various stocltholders for leaye ti In terveise in the case aad objected to dis niissal of action Edward B Graves then presenied a petition to be continued contin-ued as reseiver and objecting to dis missai P L Williams argued the matter in behalf of Receiver Graves anti 7lIor rip L Ritchie argued the case for alt dtlfendants except J H MacMillan and Ethonrd B Graves Mr Allison clOsed the argument Tlsc court gave parties seeking to continue the receivership until the next rule day in which to prepare and file their pleadings The cause was dismissed as to defendant Melntcsh The matter of thd objections of the various parties to tlsejurlidiction sjf the court ivas then set for Mondai afternoon after-noon next after the hearing on the iOi rocks case F J Kiesel Co vs Suit Insurance office which involves sixteen similar cases defendants motion oi interest oa judgment for costs in this case was advisement by tue court SHORT DISTRICT COURT ORD1RS Mathew Wilde vs Union Pacific flail road company defendant granted ten days additional time in which to pro pare and serve motion for a new trial Patrick Gilhigan vs tltc Union Pacific Railroad company came on for Isearing on the demurrer of plaintiff decision was reserved Commercial National Bank vs Weber county former decision overruling do murrer set aside and plaintIff permItted to amend former demurrer Thomas Banalgan vs George Crosby et a demurrer overruled and tees days granted to answer Warner vs Myct supplemental pro cceding referred to A E Pratt as ref cr00 to take testimony and report 3 W Ott vs IIughes Produce corn pany dernurrci submItted and taken under advisement Emanuel Zuar vs DennIs Rasmussen hearing on motion and demurrer motion withdrawn densnirer submitted overruled over-ruled and ten days given to answer Notice of decision waived Thomas Bannigati vs George Crosby et at demurrer overruled and ten days given to answer v G Warner vs Isadore Mayer court referred matter to A E Pratt t take testimony and report findings 1 W Ott ys 3 H Hughes at al demurrer de-murrer argued and taken underadviss inent |