Show CEJIKOGISAVHY Another Dense of the Kaltous MIicry New York 29ACter ineffectual efforts by Philps counsel to rule out the tepti mony on purely technical grounds Expert Ex-pert Ames testified boforo Judge Davis that the handwriting of the forged Garfield Gar-field letter to Morey was inconsistent and not the natural hand of anyone At some points the loops were long and some short some thick and come thin Witness Wit-ness added When Garfield crosses his ts the cross line begins at thc letter itself whereas in tho Morey lettr the crossing is a dash which the tern of tho loT cuts in its middle In regard to the si nature na-ture the dot of the 1 is to tho left of the Fi instead of to the right and in the editorial marked II D to K l I find this peculiarity in the same word The writer of tho editorial Philp has a habit making a Jiof three distinct straight strokes There is only one K in the Moroy letter and that letter may be compared with Exhibit 1H last Jine It will also be found in Exhibit H line five They are entirely different Furthermore in Garfields genuine Cigna turo the J1 is round at the top In the horsy letter on the contrary it has an angle at the top The form hand pressure and eleven degreoi of inclination inclina-tion make it impossible fur Garfield to have written it Crossexamined Too witness had come from Boson on a telegraphic request re-quest Marshal Jewell Expected pay tor his services mado an affidavit at the request titoughton Knox and Baron port gave before them a synopsis of nha t he would testify tOj never saw the origi nsl Morey letter until this morning did not know Garfia dd not know for whom he will vote The prosecution next called Mr E Hogan of Troy expert in handwriting I Witness bad examined the Morey letter and photo and photolithograph copies oj it together with the exhibit oa which warrants were obtained and his opinion was that the porton who wrote the oxhib its wrote the Morey letter The More y letter was evidently the writing of a person per-son imitating anothers hand introducing introduc-ing huwevtr strong characteristics of his own in the exhibit In the signatuie 01 Kenward Pniip the K is exactly EiraiU to tho k in kept in the Morey letter wit nes found other similarity in the letters had examined the phowIilhr > graphic copies of exhibits Nos 1 acd 2 and the originals of tho Kockwel and Jewell let ters audio Jfclared they were not in the same hand writing CroiBexamed by Mr Brooks Received Re-ceived a telegram from Jewell yesterday to come hero and cxppctec to be paid did not know Garfield and was not interested in him any further fur-ther that to give him his vote Witness was then shown by Stoughton for the prosecution the envelope poduced this morning and was esked if there had been an erasure on tho stamp and he answered in the affirmative Continuing ho laid There is an erasure in the day of the month I cannot say what the original date was Tho indications indica-tions are that the date and month have been erased by rubbing on the back of the envelope stamp The dato there bears indications of erasure th date and month cannot bo deciphered Ihero are three stamps on the envelope in which no dates can be mado out all dates seemingly seem-ingly being erased The address on the envelope is not in handwriting of the person who wrote the Rockwell and Jetvell letters but it rcembles the writing writ-ing of the person who wrote exhibits A to K on which the warrants of arrest were granted All M Leet newspaper reporter examined ex-amined by the prosecution Enid he was familiar with Pbilpa handwriting Exhibits from A to K were in Philps handwriting j had seen a photoIilograpb of the Morey letter and believed it to be in Philps handwriting thought to when he first caw the copy Philp always had a habit of spelling such words as companies and similar words with y V instead of ies In the Morcy letter I thia mistake is made At this stage Bell heresaid he would J liko an adjournment as he bad other witnesses to examine who were not present One Lynn witness bed not arrived and another expert was sick Brooks and Ptvor objected to delay and wanted to produce proof of the genu no ness of the letter Judge Davis ssid owing to the national character of thi case he would tit as aa examining magistrate a thing not without precedent pre-cedent although unusual If tLis letter i was written by Gneral Garfield it not only was unworthy him but should condemn him |