Show W -’MJUt 4JH Sl a OMUH MHMr THE J ar i GREENSHEEBaM day Oct 13 1988 Viewpoint - America’s Who The Won The stand questions (to be principles The that matter Bush-Dukakis answers the to better to get away the rehearsed cheap" the "on has devalued dollar real companies and Senator bargain) at Quayle length and that he the be us question a that answer an their straight this the with political television bore won’t Well estate It’s us you with the those deficit that be our seen as wisdom about with you above all a humor others should it be care disap a out of U S of next Sheet part Green letter few a She as which ’88 as each from weeks Vote your a by weeks for candidate Senator jicbel® down on local to representatives Legislature and school your State submit to along purpose was to opportunity an give There get better and men represent to 92 The readers our the want all in Bat®1®8 word photo a to with were 200 a with acquainted women who pointment was of statement the like couple inviting boards or really who probably will it issues the of Voters Women of sent the or sense Say® opportunity of them many I facts II the the with past issue week’s to knee-slapper League a ex-plained this of real a to the I all like resemblance the had deal here over office and Bush-Dukakis it’s there We’ve ago time us from Coming all With the tax has rhetoric initiatives become the or the What apples compare with disconcerting is who the insist on pop-up give (on personal confusion of emotions The a things chunk based on large sides issues people of unrelated of sides initiatives THE to refer to both on aS - three the in mind of there the is and rollbacks even tax take may of different they tax tax these inciease of tax a designs "a or avoid tax insurrection tax limitation other property any itself support two years with sales turn entirely of '87 confused The and this in the for of the with income taxes pre-1987 reduce different a - affected the the source by the the them at also are of check voted school to home or real which problem Murrayites Snobs Not Nemelka N Joseph letter signed Regarding the 29) the for received we C between expansion and expansion in from good the I wish extend to and our benefit considerations that hope extending community of the her sleight reason boundaries It much the and that know will City has he the issues has all ran president because nothing difference between the Quayle and Wedinesday Dan the else could explain media description Lloyd who debated man for big labor run for as a has especially foolish What baffles ignore me Quayle’s accomplished Bentsen than Training is far on defense how the record more has Partnership in in 18 Act and media in his the 12 years he can Mike Above all press the Dan Bentsen He in had the passed the made rather ha senate Job the courage how long so it comes Enuf with" over voursisaX ) WlMP o J-p 2X1 --- IM js i f W UTURE A AS JKsX -find jl ) PETERMINE AMERICA'S Bl i already vote TH'A thatIx issues I understand l If W MM WORLP POWERS! JL taxes the most important little a giving are and amendment the to good IN shouldn’t qualified is to in step Dukakis 1970 the on Senate mqjor campaign the plane about he of ruining ww nanon ne big against government liberals the As most liberal man to since presidency George McGovern was Dukakis qualify he "ultra-liberal?" an has held his to Bentsen if he Morman I disagrees shift the from "How individuality of Union and the allowing for simply is obvious I look to in all we would not voting you record labor to join? You rights will clause him be to any the bless party Owens violence know that deny this voted on labor and to Chris But this I have are Not a only Isaac is past not Is it liberals Please everybody want you not are to their always of force right everybody to talking join or about tells me under weak and tike in explain you are such a we and Todd When be that by to Carter the comes ready Michael The to refuse down the Green As length of As be 10 am to that to it good States United believe should the to brief was the although not the be too Soviet the Soviet Union has in the Angola first treaty These weapons policy present of All should 250 contributions Letters They received the and our for Editor confined not must In Tuesday to be words correspondence commentaries be signed office later no publication be may on that used space a to contain as available Primary consideration will be given submitted by people with expertise topic about which they write A the the of that submissions 84107 expertise may accompany submission are and clarity space They to: The Green Sheet Ut trusting leave welcomes either Letters description ole Democrats "War Hawks" vote argue the fact well Union It those in that in Owens Ted members of continually can Soviet nuclear through our about basis Dukakis it one the comments See I for It must W60K Longer forget usher Wayne and No Sheet See I expanded Union believe we back go when Soviet help to the Party liberal past handled come strength readers words change accept to have we wants who changing it it” repeat to present who Those two Larsen than the "Those Communist reduces through peace ‘ the defense has actually advances have They the country °f that by the Grenada starting to Afghanistan We have signed to must Congress is fits Union listened and themselves Union that strong v0U Owens mean Dukakis days that saying Soviet condemned read Wayne Although does the are be should old an with and your question double-breasting allow not jy and Stand forget who a Reagan that a Defense been them signed I condemn Michael Dukakis Kennedy all and the other against trust to treaties American to this libelous but a the threat from Rnah of you foreign reason in this aggressor Europe Africa Central America they despite the are desperate and of no any have (Eastern to who disagrees with my claims Congressional Record and see for labor century Indo-China) after year They Congress one Congressman followed is knees to a go a from his on to who absolutely not pleading join Saint brethren own hope that and bless and then them gospel I us have or a ruse dominance confirm well as come union? a Because his how yourself Michael individual of challenge There Now donations How not to protect and one situation you companies? join God the Saint down get can inspire his that employment because brother will his not surrender manhood and join union with-him" a Gospel by J Standards Heber Grant rom 135-136 Deseret News Press Salt Lake City pages right Utah 1 941 Truth hurts Wayne? Pro-Union Owens: do to union a direct rule Latter-day a on you Why for of such eliminates how see his to given countries and race Too man your Union cannot of such little any neighbor your mighty you leaders? manhood his Latter-day no the starving union in could all your without year the campaign I pray Saints Christ of labor a love when member a little unless its rules allow Jesus day in surrender and Lord the see not Mighty the there Condemns Owens Wayne will is double-breathing with Allen pro-union he love and one emnhana of Quayle-Bentsen presidential to much president quote from racketeering thia it see attention How willing is mission this explain because the issue? major to he of man from principles be whom man a requires a taken a beating has Lloyd can for as presidency in the then is little as odd how me Lloyd Bentsen’s complete to Hiai direct does policy foreign thoroughly so years it’s so for on said noted ( ARE ( to you’ve deserves complaining the but strong He if debate Mike Dan Quayle principled vice knowledgeable senate MMrwk campaign the that of who senator some well himself and convictions He explained look Lloyd Bentsen Dukakis and Make level-headed go care J over you you’ll people Quayle Bentsen’s and Doesn’t To himself presented tussle about of it only paid Texas over principle night Quayle don’t up like are initiatives need think even how one strikes with tirelessly would difficulty candidates be Dan been During good Responses Republican two just editor that right surface voters possible the What every inally as be and presidential that any aouDt president Brian must out pathetic followed They pregnancy you at "Apathetic deserve Milestones "Elections that a you and writer sports commented Bradford with the be should It second-guess the to this you some win to Bush-Dukakis There if as than vice campaign Quayte’s for wasn’t It Sheet candidates" long as as Green Burkett Ethel accepted for might president Smith Liked why I J® is nearly Beverly Murray dared the to bother voters that races other media statements candidates As Bob here’s expense declined Or them didn’t an f it labor? exists our that history attention disagreement the many be my would to her seem mind may Utah's attention from snobbery or Murray Nemelka Murray of Mr as However complex very attitude such not is one least compare if' Sil’ please as requests value I of of but talk structure neighbors concerned all residents neighbors that for the to nearby become no the among I S for responsible of the some mon significant reforms in defense he has procurement for fought balanced budget a amendment a tine item veto and enhanced recession authority of the oe building neighborly are out-of-pocket no many those That’s late with read you the you they all representation they will They all say they want to listen to you for chance them to we days of some giving about are of wonder you serious how priorities what - your election After I difference empire about it and simple matter to realign were a boundaries to cover all the requirements it equally of sake contribution of our residents the to response honorable people and friendship for issues up tax in sur- is aware about Even as the This all it more out and snobbery the law of the children annexation recognize can of made Bennion of the to a when or them kind shorted SH0MV S® -lar both overturning which figures all is taxes treaty feeling a to attention lot a "heart" his in become upshot private the simi- legislature suggest they assertiveness annexing objection politician who of be generate the As Gtrrfe your ( daily The (Oct response Murray residents some to state don’t most would but to make does is whittled away or though number impact "lungs" the dare contradictory Jr’s expressed the reason that hope would by objection Nemelka Mr area as giving the to late for those aside request anything about it in candidates those the heck a opportunity efforts people up appear would'have on has Cutting by for are nice give to one shy four - will readers fair allow too doing next of sense me to tell you which was which Then of course there those that simply don’t are the pushed Our be get he still responses deadline will it without you’ve their appreciate very this who we’re the to the beyond you to names hoped My limit this of 10 to by the be set legislature and some programs would no doubt have to be cut Exactly which programs would get the axe might be is or how done much trimming the anybody’s hence confusing guess educate to part willing every matter late were won’t play a way referring bothered just half had politicians about candidates us week charge no Almost write I about incumbents brandished don’t the other s rest Only about bn time more came in of will those you see claim seats deserve of some The of budget state may "stomach" the no would more the WRITE to mind - other any or the "intestines" injure While do cut" organism what return system them iri enroll OUR READERS (Sept the from assessment any so perception problem impacts though is trying to become Utahns most schools 6) called two The respond As what smooth as dozen doing the who those reach senate not are heard the were running are are who Those don’t certainly who point and' real comes double-speak legislature public The being A tax credit overpayment is other hand proposed by Initiative who parents choose to remove their Probably of think But Pm putting with 200-word our about the with It experiences and them of to and dealt but forward tnere service adhered deadline who house this down seemed last candidates those of see candidates deadline -- actions tax from "liver" almost credits tax the is when part to taxes campaign rebate tax only cigarette would A is answer legislature rebates Tax those Initiative the the state for surely would the noon enjoyable at generally for loins our hand-delivered most with interrelated the if and taxes property which not were of the fauces Ideals fuels motor back would -levels while levels ago?" property which - B Initiative Our to revenues it severely not entity) tax-supported the living a of the between B and proposed in Initiative Initiative A by advocated did the (or library says "How someone — difference big a rollback simple gymnastics receive percent 13 if piece - When mental sources that Thursday Most canbe mass which as were a "lump" but an complex of functions which is at to : there's the of for to prior girded office our scrutiny) nebulous one immediately armed j not di that in thought the to side r'-'- the also different would have to programs into consideration take those sources to be deemed valid To talk about "a six percent cut" any banish want -Second our We those on office onslaught voter bit a tax impact hikes with should if government have pass government Different programs initiatives rebates tax one on either is advocating no issues politicians rection of taxes entities initiatives the you the indicating in in instead arouna thatdeadline reach of type of foot board school met While received we early statements very the candidate sat right home at others came they were that favor jokingly to how would statements best two or attitude we lottery as a her or one staff a many connection alcohol and any between but school lunch that’s the law is way the The story is similar with structured many areas blurred a understanding tax all complex complexity the to his do than eveiyone interested genuinely easily government work Some of more all that our of be press virtually that see to appear with the in deadline type planned should concerns only one many other ways taxing misses irst this state As One find confusion what concerning Somehow do and credits apparent the is clear-as-mud vague and taxing itself assessment as the them word a 'I of public limitations indication - three It measures problem might tax and face and the of Given scope the project needed to allow we sufficient for time typesetting the photos etc preparing public works deadline a highlighting limit of income through different taxing sources the structures or school lunch example program receives funds collected from taxes by the assessed on hard liquor (which way if will in not be impacted the slightest even initiatives Another property the in separate the alone the has of assessing all issues two to Different were one animal of the They be part problem are not may -Each is designed to deal with separate without any connection with the other if a 500 than more addition let nature mountain thinking than its in some tax alone penchant these created choosing is their complex the has frighteningly a population pushing is and Rather though the sides) agenda measures these through of both misunderstanding how government money a to has at look is gets taxation Everyone of It Sides set bold as entities toasters! own mind where Utah oranges Immersible with side is here faced it one however people of growing number apples comparing hear to about ballot November the on commonplace other around floating Both rom We help to democratic form has chance to a all parties Rhetoric People Nice Are us we strange and lie a in come Just sizes prepared our will be published there process-smile camera tonight of But but candidates pay our values they keep telling us family and ends companies real thought to de-ibate unrehearsed trade his in hell with the asked ever them gave do rest answering at parents our to can’t scary) foreign are -estate about answers the much so it all for huge (our the be with business (and are When would public with of because some astounding ones Quayle was asked about buying US companies nothing jobs question the hear anyway If we "won" better rehearsed had the and questions question and paying low have may much wasn’t the in the politicians Utah shape thanks no Bentsen Candidates Japanese companies The Japanese the profit We are get get but anything true fed what and and Dan he was media candidates be may believe for when companies managers Thanks While Losers jobs US workers the the answered getting matter the are courage not same are news provides buy least which in or the no the sadly allow It the way We I and At accurate) makes me VP candidate stands more or and answered were neither that Voters Women them by The Are good-it Debates? of League have some they tp VP Voters — subject may PO to be Box editing for addressed 7187 Murray |