OCR Text |
Show Whose Was of siiaros voice TIIE Fault the-dat- It? Pme One) (fnntinued from for a 45 .i.kt Counsel will auk taf in which to file their L,, pleading lack of time. set by the Ko date has been for hearing of the case. Loro City answered the original Motion of the Utility company November 10. following which granted HWty days to lw a brief. The m Vb!ch to file mb Power and Light counsel r 2 to file at agreed stipulation vu siren until January krefi in a that time. -- It granted, as asked by the the Power Company would until February 15 In which Court, bnfile This brief. its to ed by the Supreme Court set for the filing 0f brief, in the case against Provo City for Feburary 1. A second postponement was asked by the company's attorney Monday.' ' The action of the Company in asking for further delay with stern rebuke from Anderson today ' IVe objected to the first de- granted a mouth ago, knowing that delay is the chief weapon of the private power lutorests In all cases similar to our. "The election in Proto waa held October IS. JSSG. For more than a month before the election, the power company knew our whole plan. The ordinance had been published. Ou October 14 we were served with writ, that had been prepared beforehand. Ordore from the Court to atop until onr case could be heard. would aobe a decision Impossible tb middle of March. be-fg- jf Fcliruary 3. 11137: A postponement until 17 was granted the Febru Utah yrt.fi. Power and Light company for the to in delay "Mayor objects filing of Its brief in the Provo Bearing of Power Appeal. municipal power case heard on "Protest against a second de- Tuesday in the Supreme Court." attny in the filing of briefs by Power the 10.17: for 17, company February orneys "Brief of the Utah Power and attorneys 'for nere lodged by in the Provo Proro City today with the Supr- Light company ary I7 eme Court. first postponement grant "The municipal power case, was filed Tuesday In the Supreme Court1 ctm So mm BOTH FAIRS (xml dear your tha United SMt and back hoow for peony a manic luntm and nnKnntad alt lotSOChotenefmnuy day return Unit. Baoipkoiiiuthope Uupawra. ta NtwAir-Cotdilton- suss OllautniodlHtniiwrokn iiNERS low ROUND TOP FAXES TO EITHER FAIR 65 TO TO $Cn-7- 5 $ KFWTORK DU SAM FRANCISCO I in. r EARLY J wwmmismma new fleet of ultramodern buses still be operated on it fait thrmigh schedules over the most Diesel-powere- New travel lix-r- y nmazint i :v eerrfrt :. no e: tre Vaal arjoy even ndnuta of OLtumtOH BBbmtad Chela Tour vfaitieg tha Worida Fair in Em Tiaadaeo, Los Anfeica and Bcuthsrn California and U: Lake City. Btopovca vhom yon ariah. TSAKWAVS 95 DEPOT d comic California a r.c C'!v;a;o. CIRCt&fO TRJULWAYS TrallwaysT Burlington Son? Chicago's famous skyline, paiha, museum. Visit Dttnit Kttsbuiah, BuiSaio, Nuiaani Falls, Cmndn. " UBS, Mt Vonoa, Atkntie Qv, Mat lash. New . Ali arc reached at vmr low eortby BUSIWOTON HATS and affiliat Lines. BUUiNfiTON IN JUNE iTRfl(LVftyS 5! West Center Street Phone: 1272 Friday, May 8,1989 e (hour month had elapsed tile today in tho State Supreme since tlie Pouer court. Company started Court action). The Supreme Court on II, 1127, gats Proto the "Judge Elias Hansea of tha Proto city legal staff and City right to go ahead. Attorney I. E. Block bank will op(Artlon fur rehearing held pose the extension for the filing j the City again). of the contractors' brief the! ' 16, 1088: I mayor reported. The Utah State Supreme March .10 1037-la- j court denied by a unanimous .p c,y hrlef ,n the munl-- vote, the Utah Power and aLight , recompany's application for t plant .,'albrought by the -l - Power and Light Com- hearing of the Trovo city munici- pany waa filed Monday In Salt pal power case. City." bad (Nineteen months "The brief aska recall of the now elapsed since file Power temporary writ of prohibition company took Provo city to granted Utah Power and Light court. Four and one-ha- lf company and dismissal of the months on rci tearing.) Power Company's request for a permanent writ directed towards May 17. 1038: "Mayor Takes Steps to Start prevention of erection of a municipal light plant here in accord- Municipal power construction. ance with a e Representatives of bonding election result passed by a slight majority and conitructlon firms expected here shortly. Election Petition here last fall. la filed. April 27, 1A37: Meanwhile 22 local cltlsens "The State Supreme Court filed with City Recorder I. Q. heard the second day's argument Bench, a petition asking the City In the suit of Utah Power and Commission for initiative petiLight company seeking to obtain tion copies so that they might a writ of prohibition forbidding submit to Provo voters an ordinthe cities of Ogden and Provo ance which would repeal the orfrom constructing municipal dinance passed In the fall of power planti. 1928. mnntlia (Six and one-ha- lf Mayor Anderson today held that the ordinances voted upon pawed since Power Company were contract ordinances and took City to Conti.) could not be repealed without June 7, J037: violation of contract "With construction coats mounting and change current in Slay 24, 1038: "Controversy to be taken into the bond market, delay of the state supreme court in coming to Court. "Provos municipal power a decision in the municipal light plant case works to the disad- plant controversy appeared headvantage of the city, Mayor Mark ed for the courts again today aa petitioners against tha construcAnderson noted Monday. A decision was expected June tion served notice that they will 1, but no word has been received file writ of msndamus proceedyet by the defendants In the ings in district court Thursday or action which seek to enjoin city Friday." officials from constructing a May 27, 1038: municipal power plant in line Events moved quickly on with provisions of a city ordinProvo city's municipal power and ance passed here last fall. light plant controversy front toDoe-emb- er 1 ' K- city-wid- December 31, 1B37: 'Provo city won a victory In the municipal power fight with the Utah Power and Light company today, when the Supreme court handed down a decision declaring the controversial bond and construction valid under the laws of the State." "The decision', written by Justice James H. Wolfe and Martin M. Larson, concurred In by Justice Ephraim Hanson, recalls the temporary writ of prohibition granted to the Utah Power and Light Company, October 14, 19SS anil denies the Companys petition that the writ he made permanent. lf j OtowaGB j aY May 5th Through $287 "aaff fggg wmwm yy muiMimUtW RT line hiit . rotgAU-- IN , STUCCO AND fc asft&t-s&u.- s CONCRETE paints. PAINT SHEHWnC' WILLIAMS Snwft . . . SS2 gALLDNl SHC. $298 'WLAtrTc5'70 SEUUUSTffi sggssas Sll3 QUICK MYINO Enunut ASSESS 39c FOK UNOUUM GALLONS 9SsPa59& Mark Anderson Into push the municipal power program along the original tends plans. day. mawava 5TN55rW FHA " Vs oSSlXmmmO, Utah Valley Glass & Taint Co. Center St. PRO 0, UTAH Ladies fancy rayon TAFFETTA SLIPS Thursday. Mnrrh 10, 1083: two-third- Vacation clothes . . , don't worry about them. Just send them to Madura's for super de luxe cleaning. Wlira yon got them beck, yon'll aee why onr cleaning process is the favorite of Provo. Your slilmmcry, summery gowns will fairly sparkle In their new freshness. Cnll onr plant today; we pick np end deliver nnywhere. PHONE 475. power eaa. Originally tha city had nntll Starch 5, in which to Me answer to tha petition of tho Power company following tha decision of the Supreme court in favor of the city right to go ahead with Its municipal power program." March 17. 102: The Utah Power and Light it'J petition com ten supported fur rohi cinq in the P- ovo Power a brief onj with plant controversy of Ladies House Dresses Just Arrived New line 98 Ladies All Silk DRESS HOSE Knee or long length 25 Mettellneffs 15 368 West -- EOSffpy RADIOS Ask to See These and Many Other New 1939 Model Radios At lop Model "58 a wonderfully sweet toned 6 tube set with built-i- n aerial, euperhotorodyne circuit, mart walnut finished cabinet, HKi SKxfitt inches, 550 to 1800 kilocycle range, electrodynamie speaker and hill vision dial. , . New CfhQC LOW Price only Other Sets Shown Are Push Batten Tuning Model l 52 5 tubes and slide-rul- e dial i9s 8 Tube Cenacle Model a beautiful 1288 set, big cabinet, world range and other features. push-butto- n 39 Reduced to., i. 8 Tube TabU Model 6 push-button- beautiful "288 dial, slide-rul- e s, 16x9x8 nut cabinet New . low price .... Ask AboutEaMf inch wal- 299 Tmns nsr Ask For New LOW Prices On Battery Models Tabes, 4 Automatic Pash Dattoas Never at such a low price have heard any car radio to match you Fit Your Car thia new 1939 Motorola , You'D marvel at the natural tone the Mounts Under Dash Separate Speaker (fistance( Beautiful Tone Center St. PROVO, UTAH oiUaound. performance of thi Compact set A FREE demonstration will convince you that it is THE Top Value . .1 New LOW Price Ask for Low Prim on Other 1939 MotoroUs BmdU tarrying thargo on forms. l9395UP.ERIDRiUJas 49 Boys POLO SIIIRT Air Patrol Quality Cleaners Boys Elastic Top ANKLETS 15e Value 25 Wjkl939 vfestern 6 Madsens Little Girls Fancy JEAN OVERALLS Real Values Double Terry Turkish Towels 39c Values the Provo municipal c Wins yon start thinking about 10 Extra Large rolM MADSENS The Greatest Washer Values We Have Ever Offered Go Farther 39 Postponement until March 21, of the time in which to file reply brief was granted tha Utah Power and Light Company by the Supreme Court in it petition for a . Phone 403 two-thir- Make Your k. division of ,curt Wlll UJt lM.,ore My 10. ring to the city electorate the supplemental power bond ordinance passed by the City commission August 5. 3E (Power company tot Full time allowed). February 8, 1033: "An answer to petitions for rehearing of the Provo municipal light plant case before the State Supreme Court will ha formulated next week, I. E. Brock-bananProvo city attorney In . 1 February 1, 1088: Petition Holds Rulings In Favor of City Are Erroneous. A petition by the Utah Power and Light company, asking for a rehearing of the Provo munici- July 1. 1038: A gronp after of cltlxena, pal power plant ease, was on file with the 8tate Supreme Court to- several meetings with the Utah nounced a committee with the Utah Power and Light Company was scorned aa 'an insult to the intelligence of the people of Provo' by Mayor Mark Anderson in a statement issued to the prm today. Juno 12, 1088: "With construction of a munl- power plant by Provo city blocked through temporarily State Supreme coftrt action In Suspending Judgement In its Provo Power decision pending an appeal to the United States Supreme court by Utah Power and Light Company statements wera forthcoming from three points of interest hers Saturday. Mark Anderson exMayor pressed determination to fight through to the end of the power issue although disappointed by the State courts action In granting the appeal. stated he Mayor Anderson doubted if the Power Company would take their appeal to the United States Supreme Court for he feels sure tha Court will refuse to hear it today." Ipeared the law, tha Utah Power and Light company. Plain-- ; ! tiff In the action, has a right to file a motion for a rehearing which is allowed a definite time to run. If the city administration decides to push construction' of the proposed system as soon aa possible, it will probably he at least six months before the last legal obstacles incident to the Supreme court decision will be swept away. rehearing tSm" Mj-ogf-jass- 313 West "Provo city will not be in position to launch into a municipal power conitructlon program at once, because of the victory won in the Supreme court, it ap-- Mayor ,rwc$ts lit afi335 S287 francIt t tens ten-ye- ar , u AiIbIk: Aml-.'- i' 'iho am tor ihasrahaartag. never The b" luvs. We If they keep their hand of us can do uothlng official befort for thirty days tha first phase of that date but we will have a plan ir V'u? 'M o' jc" of artlon by that time. si ruction and the City plant will i The City does not expect to ha ready to take over tha satin August 25, 1038: rehearing but w are olactrle load of Provo within tea City Clerk, I. O. Bench of a11 tor Provo waa ordered today to have told that tho opposition la going petition copies printed for refer- "Mnyor Terms. "The proposed U, w to initiated City any court action nor asked tor 6 rehsrng. The Power company and the Cltlsens' committee an tht rcocnsible for rll the rionl:ey paying it aft. August 27, 1038: "An election to end all elect-- . In the tions municipal power, 10.18: July 3, Provo city will not stand In plant controversy waa suggested the way of an election on a fran- by Mayor Mark Anderson today. chise for Utah Power and Light October 10, 1038: In company to operate Provo, The Supreme Court today deMayor Mark Anderson said Sat- nied the petition of the Utah urday. Power and Light company for a review of the Utah Supreme rourt July 10, 1038: Of all cases brought before decision refusing to enjoin Provo the United States Supreme Court, city, Utah, from constructing a are . never heard, In municipal power system. my opinion, I feel thta rase will November 18, 1038: Utahs supreme court today s, be among the said ordered City Clerk I. O. Bench to Mayor Anderson. comple with applications of Provo July 24. 1038: Petition forma railing for a citizens group raqneatlng petidevote on a new franchise to Utah tion copies of two ordinances to the municipal signed repeal Power and Light company were and power plant construcdelivered by Jacob Coleman of light the sponsors committee to City tion and bonding ordinances pashere October 12, 1921. Clerk I. G. Bench, Saturday sed afternoon In the latters office. April 10, 1030: In a public statement accomProvo citys amended bond panying tha art, Mr. Bench stat- ordinance, passed by the Cltj ed: Under tha state law, I am commission on August 6, 1922 compelled to deliver the initi- must be referred to a vote of the ative petitions on the Utah Power people, as requested by the Cltland Light company franchise. sens' committee, the state supreme court rules today In a unAugust 2, 10.18:' animous decision of tha five Under agreement with John justices, Nuveen and Company, financing of Provos new municipal power FREE OH NOT FREKT Provo city haa no municipal' plant will ho made so that by systematic refinancing after the plant yet (according to tha opplant la underway, interest char- position) they were free from ges wlll be cut ona per cent to a legal entanglements on July 10, day. Whose fault wqa It? 2 Vi per cent. Mayor 1929. Filed with the Utah Supreme probable court on behalf of petitioners Anderson advised today. M A YOU'D STATEMENT: aeeklng a new election on the August K, 1038: Our plan aa adopted by the power plant issue was an order Ig1 people on October 12, 1926, conPower Bond Ordinance to show cause directed against Amended. templated one year for construcI. O. Bench, City Recorder.1 City commissioners moved a tion and two years of operation step nnarer their goal of a muni- before any bonds would mature. May 20, 1038: 4 sets cipal power plant today with un- We did not anticipate three years June for Power "Court animous passing of a supplemen- of legal monkey business. case. We had lost two years through tal revenue bond ordinance." obstructionist methods employed May 81, 1038: (Two years delay made "Power suit Writ served o by the Power Company and were, amendment necessary.) Officials." therefore, forced to amend the Angust 11, 1088: original bond ordinance to pro(City rmtralned from pro The application filed shortly vide for tha loat time. waa to free reeding. City No practical would after 1:00 p. m. with City Clerk person proceed for taro weeks.) I. G. Bench, asks him to secure assume that bonds eonld he Bold printers bids on petition copies , without correcting tha dates to Junn 6, 1038: up for lime loat. There City Recorder I. G. Bench said which the committee may Saturday he will appear before prove, have printed and circulated ;I would be no sense In selling or tho State Supreme Court June calling for a vote of the people buying n revenue bond that must 15 to show cauao why he should not comply with tha group's demand to supply printers bids on the petition form sought to present signers against tha municipal plant construction. January a, 1038: 8VJP ar chise negotiated by be paid ufl before revenue could posribly be made available for a, ' (Fourteen and one-hamonths elapsed since Power company took case to court.) I on tho supplemental bond ordin-rialance.r August 24, 1038: 'Initiative petitions for an electric franchise in Provo city were filed thta Afternoon with County Clerk, C. A. Grant, Ja Coleman, chairman of tha 8pou-- i announced sor'a committee. shortly after noon today. Power and Light Company offi- made application for peti- tion copies to grant tha Utah Power and Light company a new franchise for a ten-yeperiod were filed; these petition coplea wera furnished and circulated and signed by the required uum-Ma- y her of voters and are now ou file in (be office of the City er. Before you buy any washing machine, eee these new Superiors. You'll find In them lasting beauty of design, greater dependability and longer trouble-fre- e service than yea ever hoped to find at Ladies itch low prioes. SHIRTS Pastel Colors POLO Three Snow White Beauties 49 All with fast washing, gentle action three vane agitators; rubber cushioned lifetime oiled motors; forced-fee- d lubricated mechanism; adjustable wringers with safety release and cushioned balloon rolls; motor driven drain pumps and other proven Little Boys & Girb features. POLO SHIRTS Real Values 25 Girls' Elastic Top ANKLETS y -- |