Show Claims That Smelter Push and the Tooele Bunch Run the Utah To the Editor Utah Dear Sir Would you give space in your valuable paper to a discussion of House Bill which has just been passed by the and Senate over the Governor's The Tooele Bunch is f dozen men of Tooele part of whom are the hired tools ot the Tooele Valley Railroad and Smelting Company-hired to separate the people from their rights and Their names can be had for the They i i have was reached Mature passed this f mam over the Governor 1 you Ive that over 90 per tax payers and voters County are unalterably this The voters and tax payers you jj surely did not you were taking away tl J of the people and smelting corporation a if with which to ebb you U whenever they take the do You of the the that Tooele sent to represent it m make a personal attack Wm writer but he failed to n that he had been nominate fa elected representative iy of his expressed attitude io t f tion to the passage of an M as the one just he M r against He pointed the writer being about the only one this measure in Tooele Cm ft The fact is I was there ing 90 per cent or more people of Tooele working for the Smelter with its millions of little money a sufficient ment for a man to turn traM his the lA representative to Let me tell Legislator that I have more in the way of progress improvement than any Bagger that ever came to not excepting h. L. f K has had a stall at the almost ever since he He has capped the nl by selling the confide trust the people placed for what I do not DM heard of the easements smelter got The tools of the pW not take the trouble to JH you that said easements by the that smelter smoke jure MH Jf have done ft you could to undo what the of Salt Lake County J f put the I hole from which it f of labor and dollars to extricate ft J Italy PAUL Xi 1 told you there herein would t and f and the ini- h ee upon i you would get a com- setting you mo credit L writing to you on the fen because you published several things prohibition that did not s me as being very good ie case now before yon ive to conclude that there room for if the Ik front page of your 11 you say that a It has been brought formal times to change the E the inauguration of the st. Then you J place March seldom Sunday in the world's fj ad this was probably ft if not only reason why but ignoring t N to May for proposed would be to give Patient nearly two months term than he was chos-f and herein surely that M fen on Sunday than Each is M as far eadi other day of that X J are for in leap win me as second W 8 and the- Phin i the cent's 11 a break oe- J extra of break I as will be the case in the year A. the same regular recurrence of days of the week corresponding to days of the month will continue from the year 1900 to the year For instance in this March on Thursday and Hay 1st cornea on Now you can put it down that in 23 years from or in the year March will come on Thursday and May 1st will come on There will be other years before 1937 when this will as for when the whole year's calendar will be as that of In 1920 March will come on Thursday and May 1st on but that being a leap year will not make it a duplicate of since 1st of 1909 on and January 1st of 1920 will come on Going now to the frequency of happening on this occurred in and will come in May 1st will come on Sunday no nor any less nor will any other day that might be It is a fact that the of March seldom comes on Sunday for inauguration because of the irregularity of the changes caused by leap but you will find that it comes as many times as May For instance inauguration days' of last century came on Sunday in and will come this century in three times in each Had May 1st been inauguration day it would have happened on Sunday during inauguration years in and and in this century it would come in and three times in each Now as to the complications which might arise by putting off the inaugural day to May first or which would be any other day more The Constitution could be amended so as-to permit and inasmuch as there are several amendments being this one could be submitted along with the others and no doubt would carry if properly brought before the Youre L. BOOTH- |