OCR Text |
Show The Paper That Dares To Take A Stand Page 6 The Utah Independent August 7, 1975 The Homo! How Much McLeod : Yes . . . beginning about 1947, when the Department first began to attack this problem, and up to, I think, 1954 or 1955, there was something over 100 a year identified and dismissed in one way or but it is not a problem that has been another solved by any means. This last point was demonstrated by the testimony of Ambassador Hill who was sent to Mexico and found that there were seven of the career diplomats in that embassy who were known homosexuals. Ambassador Hill was told that these people were considered untouchables because they had friends in Washington who would not allow them to be disciplined or removed. Ambassador Hill decided that he also had friends in high places and so was successful in getting them removed. "Why are so many homosexuals involved in subversive activities? by W. ... Cleon Skousen Reprinted from Law and Order Magazine W. Cleon Skousen Foreign Office which was Jong overdue. In the United States security officers had feared a similar development in the U.S. diplomatic corps and had therefore succeeded in getting 91 homosexuals fired from the State Department between 1947 and 1950. In 1952, a total of 119 additional sexual deviates were ousted. Some voluntarily resigned, others scrambled around seeking jobs' in other governmental agencies and some had to be literally rooted out. One of the sanctuaries to which a whole nest of deviates gravitated was the National Security Agency in the Defense Department. This particular branch of service is described as the most sensitive and secretive of all agencies established by the U.S. Government to protect the Nations security. It was later discovered that 26 homosexuals had migrated to this agency from the State Department This would have been impossible if it had not been for the fact that the agency took a chance on one homosexual and after he had climbed to a top position he used the power of his office to clear the way for the rest. Before long, two of these homosexuals had fled the incountry and taken vast quantities of formation to their homosexual confederates behind Senate the Iron Curtain. This called for a investigation. top-secr- et full-sca- Here is a question which has been bothering Sen- ate investigating committees for years, But its an old problem. Ever since the Roman senate was scandalized by Julius Caesars affair with King Nioomedes of Bithynia, the history books have bristled with sordid examples of entangling alliances between sexual deviates in high places. Names such as Richard Coeur de Lion, Frederick the Great, and the brother of Louis XIV, all carry morbid accounts of their involvement with homosexual intrigue which jeopardized the security of their respective countries. In 1906, the bulk of the aristocratic entourage of the German Kaiser was suddenly blanketed with suspicion when it was discovered that Prince Phili Eulenburg had set up a clique of homosexual friends immediately around the Kaiser and this cadre of deviates was virtually running the country. In fact, the investigation revealed that German public life was literally riddled with homosexuality. It was claimed tliat the origin of this deviate cult was traced back to the French Charge dAffairs who had hoped to use this cult for the purpose of corrupting and weakening the central core of ithe German government. Dr. R. G. Waldeck of Heidelberg University says this scandal demonstrated to the German authorities that the homosexuals in the governments service were united together with loyalties which were far more binding than any national, spiritual, moral, religious or social ties. They were found to be a law unto themselves and were exchanging confidences with homosexuals of other countries which constituted a serious security risk to Germany. BRITAIN AND THE UNITED STATES THE SAME LESSON LEARN In recent years it has been dicovered that the inter- national web of homosexuals has deeply penetrated the diplomatic corps of both Britain and the United States. In 1951 the British were bitterly embarrassed when two of their top diplomats disappeared behind the Iron Curtain with volumes of top secret information. Both were deviates. A purge took place in the British le 1962 SENATE HEARINGS ON HOMOSEXUALITY IN THE U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT These Senate hearings included testimony by Scott McLeod, a former FBI agent who had been placed in charge of State Department security. Shortly after his appointment, McLeod learned that one of the nations leading career diplomats who was then serving as an ambassador, was a known homosexual In his testimony, McLeod described what happened: McLeod : I sent this fellow a telegram and told him to come back to Washington. He did and reported to my office and freely admitted that he had been a homosexual all his life and was surprised to find that the rules had changed and that homosexuals were no longer regarded as good security risks, although I think this had been true in the past, and freely offered his resignation, and it was accepted. But to McLeods surprise, this individual who had admitted being a homosexual all his life, was soon given a new Presidential appointment to be the U.S. Governments top representative in Brazil. McLeod then learned that the White House and the Secretary of State were frequently clearing homosexuals or persons with' questionable Communist connections and excusing the derogatory information in their files on the grounds that it was merely incidental information which did not reflect on the personal integrity of the individual. McLeod further discovered that once a homosexual got into high places, he usually set about to gather his fellow deviates around him just as had happened in the National Security Agency of the Defense Department. The Senate committee chairman specifically asked McLeod about this problem: Chairman : Well, is it true that they try to help each other when they get into a Government department? McLeod : I do not think there is any question of that, Senator. Chairman : They try to protect each other? McLeod : I think they are inclined to bring each other along so that they get the employment in the first place, and then they give cadi other a hand up, as far as promotions and assignments are concerned. Chairman : Do you not think that this is one reason that there are so many of them in the State THE STRANGE PROCLIVITY BETWEEN HOMOSEXUALS AND THE RADICAL LEFT Dr. R. G. Waldeck believes it is no mere coincidence that so many homosexuals in government service are susceptible to approaches by agents from the Iron Curtain countries. In the first. place, Dr. Waldeck points out that during the 1930s the homosexual intellectuals made a fact out of revolutionary Marxism. The idea of ? revolutionary protest movement which offered full fellowship to them was, for many of them, irresistible. Dr. Waldeck points out that the very nature of homosexuality. makes the participant feel that he is being oppressed by the established culture and that anything which would cause its destruction should be encouraged. When some of these homosexual intellectuals obtained jobs in the government service they carried these attitudes with them. Those who entered the diplomatic service soon found themselves in contact with homosexuals from other countries and thus they were introduced to the international fraternity of homosexuals who consider themselves above country insofar as intra-grou- p loyalties subversion concerned. in are thereby Participating became a symbol of loyalty to a fellow homosexual. As a side light, it is interesting that these deviates developed the illusion that Russia is a homosexuals paradise and that a Communist culture would not only tolerate but actually encourage any amount of sexual aberrations among consenting adults. Some of them were terribly shocked, therefore, when they received assignments behind the Iron Curtain and discovered to their dismay that die Communists have completely outlawed homosexuality and have no confidence in the sexual deviate personality. They even suspect their own agents whom they train in homosexual practices in order to penetrate the free world diplomatic services! The famous French writer named Andre Gide (whom the European homosexuals call our Goethe) returned from Russia to denounce it as anything but the homosexual paradise which he had expected. Communist protagonists enthusiastically promote homosexuality for the subversion of the n culture of the West, but at home it is strictly forbidden. Judaic-Christia- THE EXPANDING INFLUENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL HOMOSEXUAL FRATERNITY The subversion and corruption of free world governments by homosexual infiltration is greatly facilitated by the international institutions designed to promote deviate sexual behavior. The object is not only to penetrate the diplomatic corps of government but also the armed services and all the various dimensions of the military-industricomplex. This objective is more readily implemented when the resistance to homosexual practices can be reduced and a more permissive climate or amoral culture introduced. This drive has been unbelievably successful in Europe and 2ireatly malng deep inroads among Americans. headquarters for Homosexuals International is located in Amsterdam, Holland. The full name of the organization is the Foundation of the International Committee for Sex Equality (or I.C.S.E.). It is described as a committee composed of representatives from organizations, publications, and national groups in thirty different countries. In R.E.L. Masters book, I he Homosexual Revolution , he expresses sympathy or the entire homophile movement and says, Presumably no one outside of the I.C.S.E. hierarchy knows what are the true objectives of that organiza- al ( iinlinurd on page 9 |