Show THAT mm M THE judge ZANES opinion in the case may not be starting to the liberals they knew that there was no justice in their demand when they first made it but having had such phenomenal success in the past in nearly all cases they have take before the courts it seems that they decided the controversy unjust as it might be and however unreasonable it might seem would also meet with success to the courts the liberals went and judge ZANES ruling must give them no particular consolation when they think of it for the judye hit them hard as though he wanted to teach them lesson in thy future to be more careful not to rush to the courts with every little insane issue or idea that may work up tending to give them a victory judge zane tells them it would be a very unreasonable conclusion to say that because the word junior was from three polls tha J H not voted for not content with telling them the rule they sought to enforce was unreason abletha ab lethe judge tells them further that it is narrow and and to his mind a man would have to stultify himself to enforce it this is certainly the hardest cuff the liberals have yet had from the courts but there is no reasonable citizen but that will strictly endorse the ruling of the court and say the liberals Liba rals got no than they deserved the opinion of the court seta aside the conclusion arrived at by the canvassing board that votes cast for J H jr and J H should be counted for two two so persons and virtually decres him elected to the position if recorder this is a signal victory for the people s party and they should not stop pushing the election frauds to the surface now that the election has bean brought to the courts to be contested |