OCR Text |
Show FOURTH DISTRICT. PROCEEDINGS IN THE FOURTH DI8TRICT COURT. Sottlngs Mado for tho September Term -Rulings on Motions I Arraignments. t Criminal calendar for tho Bcptcmbor (1805)' term ot tbo Fourth Judicial District Court of Utah, in and for Utah county; Stato nf Utah vs. Hcber Bate, fornication; forni-cation; sot for hearlug Soptombcr 21. Stato of Utah vs. NIols Potorson, grand laroony; set for hearing Soptom- I rt State nt Utah vs. II. S. Partrldgo et al., housebreaking; set for hoarlng Boptcmbor SO. Stato of Utah vs. Ilyrum Hatton, adultery; set for hcarlngSoptorabor 20. Stato of Utah vs. Julia Pelkor, adultery; adul-tery; set for hearlug Soptciulw 21. State of Utah vs. John Hanson, misdemeanor; mis-demeanor; set for hearing Soptembor 21. Stato of Utah vs. lames C. Poulson, mnrdcr in seoond degrco; sot for hearing hear-ing Septcmbor 22. State of Utah vs. 0. L. Maxwell, alias John Carter, robbery; set for hearing September 10. State of Utah vs. James Davis and Foster Bowen, assault; sot for hearing September 21. Spanish Fork City vs. Nathan Rock-hill Rock-hill comes upon appeal Soptombcr 17. State of Utah vs. Paul Stewart, fornication; forn-ication; set for hearing September 24. Stato of Utah vs. Thomas Ennls nnd John Hunter, housebreaking; set for September 10. CIVIL LAW CALEKDAlt FOR flEPTEHDEU (1808) TEUM. Provo City vs. Benjamin Richmond. Rodney D. Swasoy vs. F. W. 0. Hathcnbruck et nl. Henry Shields et al. vs. Hercules Mining company, Charles Aucr ot al. vs. A. D, Bor-maaotnl. Bor-maaotnl. Muggio B. Thompson vs. B. W. Jenkins, Provo City vs. Francis Pcny. Henry N. Grccu vs. Sioux Consolidated Consolida-ted Mining company. Carulluo Hayes vs. 0. A. Slado et ill.; set for October 8. Joseph Johnson vs. Mcrcur Gold Mining and Milling company. Allen G. Campbell vs. Philip 3. Morso ot al. Adam Anderson vs. L. M V. T. Mouetford ot nl. Jobu Cowan vs. R. G. W. R'y company; com-pany; set for September 80. Alma Carter vs. tt. G. W. B'y company; com-pany; set for Soptombcr 20, Smoot Drug company vs. n. S. Pyno; sot for Octobor 3. Geo. II. Matson vs. N. II. Grosbcck; sot for Octobor 4. Wni. E. Clark vs. O. S. L. R'y company. com-pany. Stanley L. Conklln vs. Olivia P. Drlgg. N. W. Nelson et al. vs. 0. II. Frank. Thorno vs. Ploasant Grovo. DIVOKOE, MOTIOK AND EQUITV CALENDAR CALEN-DAR FOIl BEITEJiniilt (1808) TEItM. Gcorgo Baum ot nl. vs. Peter Stubbs et al. Milan Packard et al. vs. A. A. Er-bard Er-bard cb al. John B, Mllncr vs. Jeanotto Ann Mllnor, ndm., et al. Strawberry Valley Cattle company vs. J. A. Cunningham. Jotoph Bcddlecomo vs. Hot Stuff Mining company. Clara L. McCormlck et nl. vs. Utah oonnty; sot for hoarlng Scptembor 17. G under Peterson vs. R. II. Spencer. Mary Halllman vs. John nonry Hal-hman. Hal-hman. Utah County Sayings Bank vs. Provo Theater company; set for hearing Sop- 4.r.i.fr4 IT I kUIUUWI Off Carra Whlte01dllold vs. Malcomb Oliltlold, divorce Kitty A. Hlnos vs. R S, Hlncs; set for hcrlng September 18. B. E. Knowjden vs. James B. Edmunds. Ed-munds. Minnie Bogor vs. W. n. Rogor; set for hearing September 17. 1 Spanish Tork City et al, vs. Spanish Fork East Bench Irrigation company, Stato of Utah vs. Calvin Cragan, L. tf Hluckly et at, vs. Georgo T. Peay ot al. E, A. Wedgwood et ul. vs. Joseph E. Crook ot al. set for hearlug Boptcmbor Boptcm-bor 17. Katharine Butlor vs. Job Butler. Chas. Driggs . R. Hunter et al.; I sot for Octobor 18. Dudley L. Cook vs. A, M, Davis; sot j tor October 21. Bauor vs. Provo City; sot for Octo-hejlS. Octo-hejlS. I Provo City ys. F- Pony; Bet for October Octo-ber 17. Tuunlcllff vs. Peay, Harwlck vs. Fruit and Agricultural society; sot for Septcmbor 13. II. Raghloy vs. Utah county et al.; sot for Soptemkcr 10. SIONDAT. Tho case of Lees vs. Frcoman came beforo tho court on motion to modify judgment. It was found that Judgment Judg-ment had been rendered eironlously, having been ogatnst I. E. Freeman and not J. J. Freeman. Tho court ordered the Jiulginout to be modified, Paul Stewart of Lohl, chargod with fornlcitlon, was arraigned boforo tho court and information read, Defendant Defend-ant plead not guilty. Case sot for honrlnir September 24, MUZHIK --. vv -"' t Tho case of E. A. Wedgwood vs. Joseph E. Crook ot al., camo ti on demurrer, de-murrer, Duniurrcr was withdrawn and Scptembor 17 appointed the tlmo to answer. A hearing was had on the return of salo of real estate lu tho matter of tho estato of John M. McClollan. Stato of Utah vs. Calvin Cragan camo up on demurrer to complaint. Tho caso wan taken under advisement. Tho two Ploasant Grove boys, Wll-I son and Wnrbmton, wero bound over In $300 bonds each to answer to tho chargo ot housebreaking. I TUESDAY. The matter of Emily Blanchard, Insane, In-sane, was hoard on application for release. re-lease. Court ordorcd her release on bonds of $200. Mrs. Inn Carter of Provo has entered suit for dlvorco against Edmund Carter Car-ter upon the ground nf cruelty. Sho allogos that sho has received very brutal bru-tal treatment at tho hands of her husband; hus-band; that on sovcral occasions ho has kicked her and prostrated her upon tho floor; that sho cannot peaceably live with him, and thcroforo asks that mo acicnuant pay jou nuornor iocs, and prays for V0 alimony per month and also temporary alimony. Tho caso of John Marwlch vs. Utah County Agricultural society el al, was brought up beforo tho court Tuesday morning on motion to sut aside and vacato Judgment heretofore rendered. Tho caso was aruod and taken under advisement. Tho caso of Nora B, Hughes vs. Harry B. Hughes, whoroln tho plaintiff sues for divorce, camo up on motion of attorney for plnlntlff to havo caso sot. Court act tho caso for hoarlug Soptembor 10. Tho caso of A. II. Raleigh vs. the County of Utah was heard on motion to dismiss summons. Arguments submitted sub-mitted and caso taken under advso-inent. |