Show T a IN iq T jk savu or ao UTAH 11 1 j I 1 I 1 no ai 0 4 f I 1 01 DID alp j I 1 tit W awl guv sq pa ai alu V I 1 aa U 1 ll 11 iq III l 1 1101 11 04 jax ism iio 1 ui IV soll I 1 I 1 pul 13 pul st INIZ siss oil 1 I 1 UZ A ul sic aa AM arned p by the call Is same RIM rules ilia and vaa reg 6 I 1 of jo atil bons tho practice amlo vad OtIlI Sti as govern district 1 0 1 court W sec raj 29 p d wl 4 asbill 1 0 s 4 to 07 grant bills 1 empowered courts 11 u arc also sec I I 1 but tIp divora oto jo ap NO ce 0 01 1 d os Sart I 1 hc 01 cormons mormons are concerned patia k sly done by the C I 1 sall tiei u noil 11 alic payment 0 j a 1 J lee L I 1 tie I 1 b e alge with two S selectmen loI jU U cont tute the county court 1 these courts ire I 1 11 empowered to ol il have I 1 aar charge qa aar of and 6 age ill all county culloo business pull and ji leave ajajj f I 1 the atil aavo efre plit and cutely ot 1 nil county pro oid acty sm as st is by them placed ut in wil tho custody of jo another another what crial I 1 another 1 court bence follows ill the argument re A I 1 these courts sulu may direct the al district court batio a doad proposition jIso idol admitted by federal judges Q to 6 q be mv tantan mj IQ f tho I 1 at I 1 aj it at mormonism monism 1 ITT would imagine 13 A aai thu judges o 0 ot 10 these courts are am elected 1 by alie it j 0 anca pla not jolt by the people it II is am easily observed that under past and tu present circumstances so om gentile the writer uses this still word pao simply to ol distinguish L j between U those who belong to ol tho gill mormon church and those who op do not jou belong t q it I 1 uvo br q I 1 I 1 elected approbate o judge the III wrider except from this still general jl 0 elvaa remark judge aplis A carter I f 1 green river county he was SUM first cju J commissioned by governor cummings and accepted Dob ajda 1 upon the advice of general 40 johnson the mij county tallo I 1 9 of itself m is st as as yet I 1 of jo but I little 1 political importance the atil 7 i r w mt 4 LL y arrup not IOU more thin fifty souls aldno o IM iq ble property returned 1 ut in I 1 it I 1 is sl attached 11 olT to 01 dummit county for legislative ampt purposes on ito III the other hand the alf judges p sl ot 10 the 1111 district courts r wlm collectively 91 constitute the supreme court OIL are appointed 11 ITO 4 P by 11 the president ad wl lu of 10 00 united ull Pilli states the mill 0 jo the utah legislators A has been to ol place su as plim much d power 0 JOM su as tit in the aill t lobate pun and county aspmo courts iu and I 1 lj sil as little od power iA I 1 as I 1 possible in ill the pill SIT district too courts slat this point being Q shown the amter now mou considers for a I 1 moment the atil a extraordinary law amul imul approved io lurf january Sata TT 11 1 1 fari pull and to 0 u avo idall charge of 10 falsely lil stating Is tho oil law I 1 11 II 11 S I 1 p ick I 1 III the jua entire portion ivull of 10 tho aill itma is ST quoted V sil as follows all questions of JO law AMI the meaning of J writings other than laws pull and the itil admissibility of 10 testimony SU shill clr be q by arli fanfa tind oil no mill law nor jolt parts ot 10 smil laws hillis shall be pilim argued afat poll pailo cited or ioa adopted tit in sun any court during suir iny trial except those cn it by the governor pull and q legislative 1 isi amp assembly of jo this still L territory W pur and those til 1130 sia pisia passed pi by the al congress sia ot 10 ill the united I 1 P states 1 when applicable 1 and ou no daf report jao or 10 doings S of 10 sull any court ahall bo a read dill argued amill cited or I 1 adopted abdolm P st as il pre PO TIT in any other alo J trial 49 I 1 the aa is 81 made ua en that tho 00 courts 91 of 10 territorial 10 creation 1 only accept xiv id tho laws of jo congress jj when said laws meet appio tho actual aijo knect 10 anil 11 lt aj IF ut intention 11 p 1101 ja of this j lit w is to exclude court I 1 tho sion of jo uny other court not loll excepting tho court jailo of jo united states I 1 no mt matter how moi applicable 31 olar to 01 I 1 the oll case in ill tho otil decision doc ision may ann eq bo pull ami even further to ol ca exclude suu any previous decision 1 ti of jo tho court tim 1 which u I 1 case is q be biff baill oil no matter how woj the gill decision aut may c bo 0 to 01 case in tit owes this law kivi the writer 11 will cawi venturo to say suit lias ou no parallel ill in christendom salic it 11 is s beyond dispute ap that milt a district spur judge o ili in rendering a 11 decision dea or the supreme court jano tit in itil alie I 1 action of jo tho otil district jo or ao other inferior ano would viti 04 bo guided by law mill and pul whether found I 1 tit in the 1119 statutes fiall of 30 the territory idt or elsewhere thie a a utah I 1 a vi Legia fl latora must understand tins still fact very won L and must q know that the dill supreme jIl jj aul or j district coin t ou no matter how atoll constituted ula can bot to regard tims law aa use of tho nast cliv arbitrary exercises of jo 31 lag A power aa upon aan U record it 11 will IHM be q 0 observed from these remarks I 1 what an im power amod is pj lodged pa tit in the inferior 1011 courts of alie territory Xi all judges of jo are elected pali pol exclusively by q the legislature A mans life or 30 liberty or ao dord property virtually resting in ill rill th caprice ot a judge who will alquit no authority other alian it the gill law of alie territory or 10 IN of jo congress when applicable and itt when 1101 will avii filing viii his old to 01 covern him tit in id a decision list w v pit C yet 0 gill probate court havo o po 19 1 mal irti nf fIT ittoli both HAT civil 0 and lenit It pir and aa well in III chaery as ul in common law it ie true that eq 1 of jo appeal jo ill certain wes set is allowed P to ill alm dittick courts but awit ii q 1 boet bot I 1 M lt aws 1 M I 1 kovl 1 j r I 1 ca T 4 I 1 r 1 I 1 1 0 |