OCR Text |
Show THE BATH IN truth LAW. dl I ten per cent per annum from date of Treasurer Is hereby authorised end the d. with llnquency. rected to assess In accordance 3. This ordinance shall Section pur- the for ordinance this of tak'. provision hereln mentioned, all of Lots 2 and feet upon approval. Plat Passed by th City Council of Salt i Block u and all of Lot 1, Block 12, same as the City, Utah, February 15th, 1904, am:' re! Lake Survey, City Salt d. I his approval. are shown upon the official plats of said ferred to the Mayor for feet J. S. CRITCHLOW City Recover. back from Bajd gtreet. Section 2. Said tax shall become and be Approved this 17th day of February ISIUm d all become delln-tio- n oneMrd ereof after the approval quent In three months d insix months after of this levy: Pearls Produced to Order.' Ms scientific nearl farming Prof. in Dubois has transplanted a colony of pearl oysters from the coast of Tunisto a point near Toulon. Of these oysters one in 1,200 yielded a pearl. Act- dis- Ing on the theory that the pearl ease of the shell is due to the accre- of mother of pearl under the ac- tion of a parasite, the experimenter of Salt Each has tried to transmit the disease to monthsafter said approval. Atfrj?WdP hJ Ifcorder of In certify that succeeded in.utln.ent has and and every other oysters jaad the except from correct copy of an ordinance entitled thrsateoJ ofseven and per I and producing ono or more pearls I An ordinance levying a tax and for the date annum from levy, ten cent per oysters. every I assessment ten Property on Second street, per I all said installments shall bear A B streets, and on B street between and of O date delinquency. annum from cent per to a point midway efSection 3. This ordinance shall take I Btreeta. in Sewer SAxth SLftll Firearms for Savages. a?d feet upon approval. No. 1, District for the Lake construction of Salt Council States of a United the of the City Manufacturers passed by the passed 1904, and re- - sewer, by Council City 15th, of February ritviitah Salt Lake City, Utah, February 15th, 1904, almost monopolize the Liberian trade Jerrd t0 tbe ayor f0r nis approval and approved by the Mayor, February J. S. CRITCHLOW, In firearms, and keep large stocks of 1904, as. appears of record in 17th, Recorder. my City their goods in the country, office. Approved this 17th day of February, In witness whereof, I have hereunto RICHARD P. MORRIS, 1904. set my hand and affixed the corporate AN ORDINANCE. Mayor. of said City, this 18th day of Febru State of Utah, City and County of Salt j seal 1904. An ordinance confirming the assessment Lake-J. S. CRITCHLOW, ary. ss. upon the property on the east side of (Seal.) Salt of City .Recorder. I, J. S. Critchlow, City Recorder Third East street, between Second South Lake Bill No. 21. that do certify hereby Utah, City, Dis Sidewalk in and Third South streets, Sewer Extension No. 125. above and foregoing is a full, true trlct No. 22, for the construction of a the an ordinance of entitled, and ocrrect copy sidewalk. tax and for the AN ORDINANCE. Be it ordained by the City Council of "An ordinance levying a on side east the of assessment property Salt Lake City, Utah: An ordinance levying a tax and for the South Temple and assessment Section 1. That the assessment list of C street, between of property on the west side C of west side First streets, and on the made by the City Treasurer as Boid of Seventh East street, between First one-ha- lf north South of street from Temple upproved and competed by the in Sidewalk District No. 24, for I Equalization and Review, heretofore duly block, ror tfte construction of a of cement sidewalks, sewer. W0, construction the Council for that the City appointed by of Salt Lake purpose, of the property abutting on the passed by the City Council 1904, Be it ordained by the City Council of and east side of Third East street, between City, Utah, February 15th, Lake City, Utah: Salt South and Third South streets, in proved by the Mayor February 17th, 1904, 1. That the City Council does Section Sidewalk District No. 22, of Salt Lake as appears of record in my office. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set hereby levy the tax and provide for the City, for the purpose of constructing a sidewalk upon said portion of said street. my hand and affixed the corporate seal of assessment of the same upon the 1propIs hereby confirmed, and the assessments said city, this 18th day of February, 1904. erty hereinafter described in Lots and 8, Block 63, Plat B, Salt Lake City Surmade and returned in said completed lists J. S. CRITCHLOW, (Seal) vey, abutting on the west side of Seventh are hereby confirmed. Recorder. City East street, between First South and Section 2. This ordinance shall take ef Bill No. 18. Second South streets, in Sewer District feet upon approval. 56. Sidewalk Extension No. No. 1, said property having a frontage of Passed by the City Council of Salt Laks 610 feet along said street City, Utah, February 1st, 1904, and reAN ORDINANCE. This tax is levied to defray the expense ferred to the mayor for his approval of constructing a sewer upon said porJ. S. CRITCHLOW, the An ordinance levying a tax and for of said street opposite the property tion Recorder. City assessment of property on Second street, hereinafter described to be especially afA and B streets, and on B street fected and benefited Approved this 3rd day of February, 1904. between by said Improvement from Second street to a point midway be- and it is determined RICHARD P. MORRIS, hereby adjudged, tween Fifth and Sixth streets, in Sewer established that the same will be Mayor. District No. 1, for the construction of a and benefited thereby to the full amount of sewer. tax hereby levied, and said parcels of State of Utah, City and County of Salt Be it ordained by th City Council of the are hereby assessed at an equal and land Lake. ss. Salt Lake City, Utah: rate in accordance with the linuniform 1. I, J. S. Critchlow, city recorder of Salt does Council the That Section. City ear foot Lake City, Utah, do hereby certify that hereby levy the tax and portion of provide for the said streetfrontage upon said to a depth and the above and foregoing is a full, true, assessment of the sam upon upon fronting the (25) feet back therefrom, and correct copy of an ordinance entitled, hereinafter described In Lots 3property and 4, of twenty-fiv- e "An ordinance confirming the assessment Block 16; Lots 1 and 2, Block 41, Plat "D; and the tax hereby levied and to be asupon the property on the east side of Lots 2 and 3, Block 40; Lots 1 and 4, Block sessed upon said parcels of land is seven Third East street, between Second South 41, Lots 1 and 4, Block 44, Lots 2 and 3, hundred and ninety-thre- e (3793.00) dollars, and Third South streets, in sidewalk dis- Block 45, Lots 2 and 3, Block 68, Lots 1 or one and (L30) dollars per front trict No. 22, for the construction of side- and 4, Block 69, Lot 1, Block 72, and Lot or linear foot, which is the estimated towalks, passed by the city council of Block 73, Plat D, Salt Lake City Sur- tal cost, and estimated cost per linear Salt Lake City, Utah, February 1st, 1904. 2, on both sides of Second foot of said sewer, and the Treasurer is vey, and approved by the mayor February 3rd, street,abutting A and B streets, and on hereby authorized and directed to assess between 1904, as appears of record in my office. B sides of street both from Second street in acocrdance with the provisons of this In witness whereof I have hereunto set to a point midway between Fifth and ordinance for the 305purpose herein 1, menmy hand and affixed the corporate seal Sixth streets, and feet of Lot in Sewer District No. 1, said tioned, the north of sold city, this 4th day of February, 305 63, the Plat south Lot of 8, Block feet a property having 1904. frontage of 2,895 feet "B, Salt Lake City Survey, as the same along said streets. J. S. CRITCHLOW, are shown This tax is levied to defray the expense upon the official plats of said Reoorder. City to a (25) feet of twenty-fiv- e of a sewer said city depth porupon constructing Bill No. 2. Sidewalk Extension No. K. back from said street. tions of said streets opposite the property Sectldn 2. Said tax shall become and hereinafter described to be especially afbe and fected benefited said delinquent as follows: by improvement, AN ORDINANCE. d and It is hereby adjudged, determined and thereof shall become delinAn ordinance levying a tax and for the established that the same will be espec- quent in three months after the approval d In six months after assessment of property on the east side ially benefited thereby to the full amount I of this levy; of C street between South Temple and of the tax hereby levied, and said par- said approval, and in twelve First streets, and on the west side of C cels of land are hereby assessed at an months after said approval. Each and street from South Temple street north equal and uniform rate In accordance every installment of said tax except the block, In Sidewalk District No. with the linear foot frontage upon said first, shall draw interest at the rate of 24. for the construction of cement sideportions of said streets fronting upon seven per cent per annum from date of and to a depth of twenty-fiv- e walks. (25) feet levy, and all said Installments shall bear Be it ordained by the City Council of back therefrom, and the tax hereby lev- ten per cent per annum from date of deI I I f--r. Question Before a California Court for Decision. Now What constitutes a bath? This is a peculiar question with which a California court Is now wrestling. An anxious world Impatiently awaits tho decision. A California householder is being sued for the price of a heater that was guaranteed to heat sufliclent water for a bath, and tho defendant has proved that it supplied only 35 gallons of hot water, which he alleged to bo insufficient for a bath. The plaintiff Insisted that 35 gallons Is ample, declaring that a man could get wet llrst on ono sido and then on tho other, and that It Is not necessary that lie should take a plungo In r a swimming pool. On this question the issuo Is joined. Tho court has the matter under ad, . visement Tho decision will, of course, be of groat importance, no matter on which side it is rendered. Tho legal quantity of water necessary to a legal bath ought to bo clearly defined, for the protection of the public against people . t , . i t .t ; 4 I i k i who evidently regard a pint or so , 1 i : . f . j i ; 4 4 , , ' icient. IJlblo ' students will recall tlio fact !tlmt among tho ancient Hebrews the bath was a regular liquid measure, and scholars have agreed on eight and onc-lial- f gallons as Its modern equivalent. It would seem, therefore, that .if eight and one-hal- f gallons was the amount for regulation bodily ablutions ,in tho days of Solomon, then 35 gallons ought to bo ample at the present time. This Important fact Is cited, not from any desire to .unduly Influence tho court, but merely to substantiate tlio point that tho bath ought to be legally defined now as it was In the tlmo of Solomon. And when the requirements have , been fixed, oven Chicago professors ought to be'mado to conform to them. Worcester Gazette. , i t ' i. suff- I one-thir- I -- I I ap-Heco- nd 30-1- 00 Extinct Animals. No extinct land animal of former ages has n bigger body than has tho biggest African elephant of and not ono, so far as is known, exceeded or oven equaled, in total bulk tho existing great whales, which sometimes are all of 100 feet long. As elephants, I ..to-da- horses and similar animals are traced backward through tho various strata they aro found to get smaller and smaller. Some extinct elephants were no bigger than Shetland ponies, while tho horses of prehostorlc times were about tlio size of largo dogs. In almost every group of hairy warmblooded animals existing specimens aro bigger than those of bygone times, and the notion that there Is any tendency in animal life to dwindle in size is entirely without foundation. There are, of course, exceptions, for tho extinct sloths, kangaroos, lizards and somo others exceeded In bulk existing creatures of tho same order. ? tV- y, 1 ;- One-thir- one-thir- one-thi- one-ha- lf Salt Lake City, Utah: Section 1. That the City Council does hereby levy the tax and provide for the assessment of the same upon the property hereinafter described In Lots 2 and 3, Block 11. and Lot 1, Block 12, Plat "D, Salt Lake City Survey, abutting on the east side of C street between South Temple and First streets, and on the west side of C street from South Temple street lf north block, in Sidewalk District No. 24, said property having a frontage Don't sacrifice fitness to fashion. of 4!)5 feet along said street to defray the expense Don't spoil the gown for a yard of ofThis tax Is levied constructing , cement upon . .. sidewalks one-ha- .... stuff. Dont sacrifice neatness to artistic pclally affected and effect. Dont neglect quality for the sake quantity. of rd JmoSSt if1 . . benefited by said i68 ied and to be assessed upon said parcels linquency. of land Is two thousand and twenty-si- x Section 3. This ordinance shall take ef- and (32.026.50) dollars, or (30.70) fect upon dollars per front or linear foot which is Passed byapproval the City Council of Salt Lake the estimated total cost, and the esti- City, Utah, February 15th, 1904, and remated cost per linear foot of said sewer, ferred to the Mayor for his approval and the Treasurer Is hereby authorized! J. S. CRITCHLOW, and directed to assess In accordance with City Recorder. the provisions of this ordinance for the Approved this 17th day of February, purpose herein mentioned, the east 140. 1904. RICHARD P. MORRIS. feet of Lot 3, and the west 140 feet of Mayor. Lot 4, Block 16, the west 140 feet of Lot State of Utah, City and County of Salt 1. and all of Lot 2, Block 41, Plat all of Lots 2 and 3, Block 40, all of "D, I, J. S. Critchlow, City Recorder of Salt Lots 1 and 4, Block 41, all of 1 Lake Lots and City, Utah, do hereby certify that 44, all of Lots 2 and 3, Block 45, all) the above and foregoing is a full, true and Block 68, all of Lots 1 j and correct copy of an ordinance entitled, and 4, Block 69, all of Lot 1, Block 72, and I An 'ordinance levying a tax and for the 1 assessment of property on the west side foLot 2 BIock ?3, Plat D," Salt the same are Bhown uPnl Seventh East street, - between First the official phts of said City, to a depth South and Second South streets, in Sewer feet back from nil Dtatrlct No. 1, for the contraction of a w) streets, of passed by the City Council1904, Section 2. Said tax shall become and be I sewer, Salt Lake City, Utah, February 15th, delinquent as follows: and approved by the Mayor, February d thereof shall become delin-ll7trecord In my 1904, as appears of i quent in three months after the approval office of this levy; d in six months after In witness whereof I have hereunto set E? 50-1- 00 70-1- 00 I rl V,h 1!!, a"2 are hereby assessed parcels more than dress Dont fashionably at an equal and uniform rate in accordance with the linear foot frontage upon becomingly. said portions of said street upon Dont imagine beauty will atone for j Vi. ,pth nf twenty-fiv- efronting (25) feet hack therefrom, and the tax hereby levied untidiness. SEX? Dont dress to startle peoples eyes, nd to fornars,hlWW.S0lndoUan to them. XlnUinmentoeXdax hut satisfy per front or linear foot, which is the esti- - first, shall draw at the Dont dress the head expense mated total cost, and estimated cost Snumat the rata of 1 cent linear foot of said sidewalk, and th.ll.vy, Sd all saffi InsTSnffSuSl be2 of the hands and feet., I Dne-thir- h, one-thir- . i eiSStfaaW 'll : i - ' v. siE?tenMon S' No. S&TCmSwf1 Clty Recoraen 126. |