Show fill APPEAL INCASE IN CASE AGAINST BANK BONDSMEN the caso case ot charles kelley elley a 11 a trea tre as aurer of grand county a the moab state bank I 1 the est estate te 0 of F hammond deceased W E gordon gordon n R lee kirk andrew Somer vUle vole J P I 1 miller and D fa F densel la Is this week I 1 I 1 being appealed to the supreme court i 1 the case was mas heard lit in december of last year at which time jud judge wool 00 ley rend rendered judgment for py plaintiff i 1 ti against the moab state bank for fo r and held that thero there wai was no cause of action against the individual defendants fend ants the ile action was against the bank and the sureties on a depositary bond riven given to mr kelley the judgment was for the amount of county funds on de depoint with the bank at the t time I 1 me I 1 it t e closed P ased the principal question involved in the appeal la is whether or not the depositary tary bond which ran mn to mr kelley ley and his successors in office wax was a 11 continuing obligation or expired W with ith hie his election reelection re judge woolley ruled that the bond expired upon the re election reelection and qualification of mr kelley and since the bond sued upon was given du during rl ng a prior term of hie his I 1 office that the sureties were absolved from liability grand county is interested in he outcome of the suit for the reason that teat the funds involved belonged to the the county the appeal will be pre tented on behalf of grand county by attorney a A robertson Ro berteon while th the individual bondsmen will be represented in the supreme court by attorney knox patterson Pat tenon |