Show yv KB HE OK BE A the tha E la is in receipt of 0 the following pleasant grove dec 31 dear sh I 1 wish to ask aak a few ques docs for I 1 sea re that the grand rand jary ol of iba first I 1 arat judicial dis friot at ogden asked the th ourt to inform m them what a polygamist is 11 to do with his plural wives in order to come within tho provisional of the edmunda law la Is answering tho the court let the light ight shine lime on the question which he eaid aid win was in in kOOP IlIg with the light thed on it by the U H S supreme court laurl now as far an I 1 could bo thia decision lec ision left as dark more so BO than it wits before A plural wito cannot be divorced div orceil as aa she ibe is not cot a wila in in law now when a min has but one plural wife could not liot the matter be bi arrans Bil by tit di vor ing the legal wite wile nad and then lieu mar J id the plural wife bitet and it all of a polygamist a wives wives apply for amnesty ain netty and portion anti and ob ilia same from the president of the united Sta gg as the law provides whit is la the shamam mans legal does thil set artrim him free irea 7 would he not be a kind of a grass wido werl confess as greatly per p AS our correspondent corri ondene over the ilia ammy ty questions propounded propounds d wo bamily li 11 lly dire dare attempt answering them for or it li Is hardly possible ilett thu courts will mill sustain our views to morrow some anoro ore jud judicial light might be blied alie 1 on oil tho clr kealty 1 1 alty question which would line have the I 1 e ct to bewilder us mote more than ever I 1 some of our readers may be ablo to salvo alio questions awl and fio BO er en I 1 ig ahten our correspondent |