Show TIMA lao l imell CASE bic following is is tho the report ol of the pro coddin s in in the house in in relation to the utah delo dodoo ate at ship talon from the new york lle n meagre tie ac count only ol of which appeared in in the telegraphic dispatches dispatch bisp os in in tho the enquin ell iest week ill randall kami all dem of pa raised tho the point of order against hii ar Is has kolls resolution and thit that tho the territorial delegates bo be sworn in tho the hor sustained tho point of oe ord onar crand aind all the except that of utah tho the then said thero there iq it 11 hy on tho the matter m bittor of tho the Do legato from utah there are hascy sov or 01 nt lit least two held bold by two different dif gentlemen and it is M a matter mattei na the chair it andor adl r standi it that acton cidot ot bo be determined in in advance aili anLO oi her y the old choik or the now clerk cl aik oik and to de determine ermine which shou shoudy du go on tho the roll and be called for the burp pomposo ao of being sworn in in mr marcot cox ilem of 0 N Y 1 ask Vb oLber alie name nama of 0 a delegate dol irom from if ia not on the roll loll tho the dreaher laiq thc chair has lit al ready stated thata thit its is ati at present a ill I 1 viseu ho he knows no law that authorizes igei izei any alok cle k to put it a delegate delo gate on tiny any roll mr randall of pennsylvania thero there is a gono lonnall loi nall hero here claiming to be M a delegate legato do and this thia house must talio take cognizance of chii fact it is i n R quer jon of tho the higl lost privilege and must now ho be determined The Speaker tho the chair is of abo same bacio opinion air cox colvy why did lie ilio clavir ask the gentleman to step aside the llis liis namo his has novel never been called tho the inquiry is is of the house as to Il hether bother lio he shall bo be sworn in the chair recognizes no roll as far as delegates are arc concerned mr randall does the chair decillo that it is not the right ofal of a mom member to ask that tho the certificates should bo be read lend the speaker yes yea until tho the question is properly before tho the house tho the speaker then recognized mr haskell of kansas to offer a resolution mr cox dy by what right light did tho the speaker call tho other jamesl names mr ho he lai haa net called anyn any names amea I 1 am on the floor by recognition of tho the speaker the Sp speaker tho the chair under stan s is required to malio make up tip a roll of mcm boia ber and i ill not of delegates mr rand kandall till does tho the chair do cido that I 1 in aa a representative hao h oll no right to call lor for tho reading re aLling of of ce why did you cull call for tho the other delegates delegat oi I 1 the speaker bucauto the chair thong lit ho he had tho the right light to call tile tho names of those delegates ascertain ing that there theio was no clin ih allongo ilona or 01 controversy on oil those cases mr cox cos but the cannot malo male tho the rolli roll the clerk dous does that mr haskell niter after a good deal ol 01 ot confusion and noise mana managed ell to offer his resolution solution ra as aa follows follow Rew rewired ived that allen alien G Camp campbeli blI delegate elect from utah territory is is entitled to I 1 ho 0 sworn in ns as delegate to this house ou oil n puma I 1 ma f tacio acio cafe case mr cox cos of P pow now york raised a point of order against ag ainest tho the rot resolution solution that mr cannons name was ana on oil the r roll ils and that the chair was bound to recognize that fact mr of jjr campbells certificate ur mr randall randal called for tho the reading of ell all ahn certificates and tho the chair stated that they should bo be road oad mr campbe campbells chef I 1 Is certificate was r road ad it is ia signed by the governor vernor 0 of f atall and is ia given to mr campbell because he was ivas the person person being a citizen of the cie ignited estates 0 r 21 years who had tho greatest it bar ot or vote s mr orr I 1 claimed that this was wag tho only certificate from utah and obil caoli to tho the leadir rending g of any other ILl paper pr V malano dem of 0 I 1 md id contended that aba tho the chair having stated that nil all tho the wore to bo be read could not withdraw that ruling mr cox argued in support of his hia nt of order contending that under point factions 31 R and 38 Ite revised sta atas ates tile the clerk was waa required ired to pr tho the litt ot delegat and in t thia is 0 pinion opinion anre are ile ho wast was sustained ly by air I 1 I 1 ler ilor bort mr of robeson Bo alabama beson ap rep of N J and ami mr rood re rep ot 3 f me MB took the 0 i idi view tho 0 latter quoting a decision e hiepe by speaker abor colfax that t at the clerk cleric could not put ut on the rolls the tha vi namoia ot of bologa delegates 9 allo speaker I 1 e overruled 0 arru I 1 d the point poin t of order thov he whole rholo mutter was then until tomorrow to morrow morning and ua ahn mena liera rs tot to tile 1 waving awitin ol of seats |