Show THAT intolerable dunco dunce known as 11 II I 1 P I 1 fen d orson re velling in tho the title of a district judge up in ili ogden lina again been displaying lis liia constitutional bias wid end stupidity bishop budge of bear baar lake was arrested tile other day by nn an officious deputy marshal simply because i tho the lellow follow thought lio lie might bo be wanted away avay out in ili idaho by tile tho officers offic erB of that Jerri territory errit tory ory the follow know abat he e had bad wrested fed him tor for and state any grounds of accusation lio lie merely suspected that the bishop Bis lioi might be 10 wonted wanted tho the betes elates the case ui as follows when this showing allowing was mada enado to judie judge aenderson Ue on habeas corpus proceeding ceedie ce g it was lite ills plain duty to dia charge the prisoner in tile tho absi absolute lute ot of ne na particle parti cl of 0 evidence upon winch which lie bulj could bo be legally held instead 0 of ti this 1 ir budge was waa not only L 1 e to custody but the judge refused tu to admit him to ball bail the rho position can ann only bo be defined in ili this lila vi way ay the liberty of tile tho citizen v was as made subject to tile the whim him of a petty of libeer e live prisoner was w deprived ol of ills his freedom without even an all accusation against him so far ns its tho the deputy depute was aware tile the judge in ili declining to liberata nta tile hie prisoner Eri prisoner in tile the absence of any reason for holding oldin ghim luci practically suspended the writ wr it of habeas corpus was thus usurping the derogative prerogative vested alono in the grobl I 1 ge dent ent of the united states arid exercised onty in times owes of great ier peril ll such as is tile invasion of a state or 01 in it the theaven th eoven levent t of in or other violent disturbance Thel dame functionary also belated a I 1 plain principle and pm provision ision of the con which forbids the deninn deman ilina pt of ball bail fl to refuse to admit to bail at all is tile tho most flagrant 1 reach ol of I 1 his re requirement nui rement ot of the sup renic law I 1 of the I 1 land rill 11 As to whether mr budge way bo be amenable for some chargo charge existing against him outside ot tho lory does not enter into the question the officer vuew knew nothing to that effect and there wa s no evidence in in that direction before tho the court the she leyl legiel proposition in must I 1 therefore there toro be plain t that 1 bat the alie prisoner was deprived of his hia liberty without due dua process bf luf law |