OCR Text |
Show DECISION JKUKT "WETS" linlki' Ituli' 'that (.iiiiuImiii IIciiiiiIii III "Itr)" ( nliinui, (ll'.NNIHON, Hept 31 As the re. suit of a decision rendered by Judge Joseph Hrlcks.ui or the Hlxth Judicial dbtrlit (liinnls.iii will remain at least a while longer In the "dr" column. The ease brought against (liinnlsmi ell) by Murllllts lleuurciotrd to test the legality of the results or the Ihpior elwtlon hold last June wus trletl lust Krldn) nnd Hnlurdn). Attnrne)s lw-Is lw-Is I .arson nnd It. A. Mcllroom nipear-ed nipear-ed for the contestant and J. W. Cherr) and Wllworlh Wmilley represented the fonicHtces. Mmh Interest wns manifested In the ense nnd when till the evhlente wns submitted nml the 4e closed the tourt rendered Judgment Judg-ment thnt the election as nunoiimcd b) the mu)or mid city count II of dun-nlon dun-nlon Is etmflrnied. with costs to follow fol-low Judgment The proclamation of Maor Chris-lenson Chris-lenson reiteelurlng iliinnlsoii "dr" ns u result of the Ibiimr election held Inst June will stand, unless overthrown by the supreme court In the event tin nppenl np-penl Is taken In the case of the state uf I'tah vs. P. T. Hetir). who wus convicted In the Justice's court fur the lllegul sale of llipior and subeiurntly cited to the dlsltltt tourt to show cause why certain cer-tain liquors seised by the sheriff should not be confiscated, the defendant de-fendant did not nppeur and the Judge ordered the sheriff to confiscate the liquor. |