OCR Text |
Show UNIVERSAL MICROFILMING CORP. "rx cel t Thursday, November 1, 1973 . NUMBER FORTY-FOU- R VOLUME XXXVII COALVILLE, UTAH 0S 2 6 L 0 City, Utch 61110 84017 0 The following statement was made to the Citizens of Coalville City this week by the present Mayor and City of $3.00 per frontage foot. May, 1973: Coalville City entered an agreement with Leon S. Simister on the same basis as die Burt L. Durrant Council: To the Citizens of Coal- agreement. The main difference being ville City. the fact that Mr. Simister Dear Citizens: was to deed to Coalville City Certain business transactions have been made by the streets necessary to the area. Coalville City during this must ofIt be noted that Coaladministration's term of ville City officials acted on fice which need clarification: February, 1973: Coalville this matter in a progressive manner to stimulate the City entered into an agreement with Burt L. Durrant to growth and development of furnish water, sewer, and Coalville City. It is a roadway facilities to his proon 50 E. fact that in all the composed Street at approximately 200 munities surrounding Coalto 250 S. Streets, provided ville there has been more Mr. Durrant would pay one-thi- rd than triple the amountaf new the cost of the project, homes constructed as has with the remaining.two-third- s been in Coalville City. To quote from the Utah payable as toilers: One-thi- rd to be paid by Industrial Development Inthe property owners across formation System-- in the to period from 1960 to 1970, the street and one-thi- rd be paid by Coalville City. No Summit County gained in work was to proceed until population 3.6 and Coalville Mr. Durrant had paid the sum City lost in population 4.7. de-vel- ope well-establis- hed sub-divisi- on Board oY Education Solicits Support in Bond Issue Vote Members of the North Summit Board of Education soUcit your support in tee bond issue to be voted on next Tuesday, November 6, as a Board feel we need a new High School Building. We feel we need a new building for tee foUow-in- g lay, which may become mandatory anyway during tee next legislative session. They cited many benefits to tee people of tee district: a new and attractive school 1973. We reasons: Our present building is 60 years old and a very trad- itional building. A new building would allow flexability for new educational programs teat would provide our students with the best education available. The present building would have to be remodeled to bring it up to Fire and Life Safety Standards which have been legislated by Federal and State Governments. The cost of which would be of such teat we would have to Bond and we would still have an old building. Officials stated the Bond can be paid back in approximately 20 years. Bonding and building now, we can save money through tee increasing building costs. The Bond can be paidback with tee proposed increase of 3 mills making a total of 15 mills for capitol out ' attracts people to our area which keeps tee enrollment up and brings more state funding for academic purposes; more people in our district gives us a broader tax base; more people financially benefit our communities; and citizens of tee community are always welcome to use tee facilities as they have in tee past. By placing the new building adjacent to tee present Vocational Center andSwim-min- g Pool there wiU be no additional expense for a building site as tee present site is large enough to accommodate tee proposed new building. This also eliminates the dangers of students crossing tee street to go to tee shop classes each period. The Board members feel in tee best interest of our district, our communities, and our children, we should build a new High School. We need to step-u- p, become progressive in our educational (Continued on Page Two) The reason is simple-- no one could buy building sites. It was felt that to stimulate growth and development, it was necessary for Coalville City to participate in growth nntioctfi July, 1972: Holliday HiUs, a division of Teinco, Donald Thiriot, President, was represented in Coalville City Council Meeting for the purpose of receiving financial aid for the sewer system installed by HoUiday Hills. Mr. Thiriot requested payment of $22,000.00 as reimbursement from CoalviUe City in the form of $10,000.00 in cash and the balance in sewer and water hook-u- p fees and credits. The Coalville City Council declined this proposal on the basis that it was contrary to the Please Do Vote! Tuesday, Nov, 6, is CoalviUe City election day. AU citizens are urged to take an active, objective interest and get out and vote for those men who they feel are the best qualified to be the civic leaders of the community. When you don't make a choice the choice is made for you by someone else. original agreement proposed by the previous administration. The agreement, incidentally, had never been culminated. This original agreement provided teat CoalviUe City, over a period of five years would reimburse HoUiday Hills in tee amount of towards Unoriginal cost of installation. Said reimbursement was to be credited to tee HoUiday Hills account through a mutually agreed upon formula involving connection fees and sewer services charges, and bearing interest payable to HoUiday Hills by CoalviUe $U, 810.00 City at tee rate of 6 per annum on tee unpaid balance. As your present administrative officials, we feel it is our duty to clarity these business transactions and to invite your questions regarding these and any City business matters. Sincerely yours, Edwin L. Judd, Mayor ArUn B. Judd, Councilman Frank W. Moore, Coun- cilman. Merlyn W. Johnson, Councilman Leon S. Simister, Councilman W. D. Robinson, Councilman. lad Slight Sos leejjuesits flauaiuo Sommissioa Session Hatheg A aJ It wasnt a particularly good evening for approvals at this months regular session of theSummit County Planning Commission. Following a reading of tee agenda by Chairman Jim Kilby, Reed --Tuft, representing Seven Associates for Aspen Acres, was caUed before the Commission. Summit County Planner Grant Orton pointed out that at this time the water situation and problems existing between the Homeowners Association and the developers have not been resolved. Mr. Orton also pointed out that a preliminary plat was never presented to tee Planning Department office. Ross Syphus, County Engineer, was on hand to present a preliminary plat for Aspen Acres Number 3. However, Chairman Kilby told the developers and Mr. Syphus the plat could not be accepted at the meeting, as tee procedure for application for preliminary approval stipulated aU documenta- tion be in the office two weeks prior to tee meeting at which it was to be considered. Chairman Kilby referred to tee minutes of the September 25 meeting of tee Planning Commission where a motion had been made on Aspen Acres stipulating teat any further consideration of this subdivision be tee resolution of problems with regard to water, roads and the Homeowners Associa erty? It was the general feeling of the Commission a bond would not be the same as water being on the property. After consideration of the problems, water being tee prime concern, a motion was made and accepted to table tee preliminary approval of Kamas East Plat B. Bill Gardner requested final approval cf Gardners place on tee proposed road interfering with the subdivision. It was brought out Mr. Gardner has posted a real estate bond with Wasatch County. Chairman Kilby suggested a portion of tee bond should be broken down and dedicated to Summit County and an agreement between the two counties should be signed. It was decided by those present the road presents the largest problem to be solved and it was suggested representatives of tee State Road Commission, Wasatch County Planning Commission, Summit County Planning Commission and Mr. Gardner meet to try and reach a solution to tee problem. Problem of a previous plat in the Gardner Addition already presented to tee Planning Commission in Wasatch County and not in Summit County was brought to tee Commissions attention. A suggestion was made that these plats should be recorded properly inSummit County. After consideration of tee presentation a motion was made to table the Gardner request until the problems noted by the County Planner can be taken care of. Again deficiencies, as noted by the County Planner and Sanitarian, were read to the Commission. Some discussion took Chairman Mel Flinders suggested tee problem of tee road could be worked out by the staff of bote Commissions, the State and Mr. tion. The Planning Commission Chairman went on to say: "that in view of tee fact that these problems have not been solved at the present time the Commission could not rule on a request for preliminary approval tonight." Vergil Fox and Bill Hughes representing Meredian Properties requested preliminary approval of Kamas East Plat B. Deficiencies as noted by tee County Planner were read to the Commission, as were tee deficiencies noted by tee County Sanitarian, Steve Jenkins. Some discussion was held concerning tee bond which has not been posted with the County at this time. The developers asked if a bond posted would satisfy tee requirement to actually have the water on the prop- Addition to East Park. County Commission Gardner. He also added this would be easier for everyone concerned and directed Mr. Or- -, ton to take care of the situation in that way. It was explained to Mr. Gardner the problems would be worked out as soon as possible. In another move tee Com- mission decided the road in Canyon Rim Ranch should be precise. motion was made and accepted to approve tee amend-me- nt and engineering changes on tee road way on A lots 161, 162, 132 andl31 CanRim Ranch Plat A. yon Mr. Orton asked for guidance on what to do about Beaver KnoUs Subdivision. He asked if tee County is going to require tee County Engineer to look at it, perform a survey and teen sign tee plat? The Commission decided to have the engineer look over the plat and sign it. Copies of the Geologic reports on Summit Park were passed out to members of the Commission for their consideration. They were encouraged to study the reports and review theSummit Park situation. A film entitled "Planned Unit Development: A Flexible Land Use Concept" was presented to members of the Commission. |