OCR Text |
Show Thursday, Feb. 24. iVilliam Cummings arraigned on the charge of assult with a deadly weapon. Pleaded guilty and sent up for six months Samuel Carson, unlawlul cohabitation, took until 3 o'clock p. m. to plead. John Steel pleaded not guilty to a charge of fornication. Samuel A- Wilcox pleaded guilty to a charge ot unlawful cohabitation. He was seventy-two years ot age. he said, and on promising to obey the law, he) was fined ioo and costs. Orlando F. Herron entered a plea of not guilty to a charge of adultery. Joseph Bartholomew pleaded not guilty to the charge of unlawful cohabitation. cohabi-tation. Niels H. Jenson pleaded guilty to unlawful un-lawful cohabitation. He piomised to obey the law, titled f 100 and costs. Levi P. Dunham came before the court on a charge of resitting an officer and pleaded not guilty. Mr. Dudley was appointed to defend him. Samuel Carson withdrew his plea of not guilty to the charge ol unlawful cohabitation co-habitation and entered a plea of guilty as charged. He promised to obey th law in the future, and was sentenced to pay f 'oo and costs. Christian Hanson did not feel like assisting as-sisting in enforcing the laws Bgainst ' polygamy and was denied citizenship. Rasmus Kasmtusen and Francis O NieUon admitted to citizenship. One Andersen pleaded guilty to a a charge of battery and was ready fur sentence. Sentenced to one month's imprisionment and $50 fine. Samuel Mulbeny entered a plea 0 guilty of murder in the second dtgiee-Trial dtgiee-Trial progressing. The case of the United Slates vs Benjamin Ben-jamin Beni. c, indicted for the crime of foin. cation, was tiiken up (or trial. The Calender Of the First District Court ! of Utah. ; At Provo, torthe February Term, 1891. Cases to be Tried, Atty's for the Same. Dr. Gunn's Improved Liver Pills. These Pills are the result of a life time study and practice of one of the hest physicians pur country has ever known. They are a combination of vegetable remedies so finely prepared and cencen-trated cencen-trated that it takes only one small pill for a dose. As they contain no mercury and being coated with pure sugar by a new process, delicae ladies find pil taking now a pleasure. They never gripe or sicken, and w ill not interlere with your daily work. Sold at 25 cents a'box by H. P. Lar.,on. 29 Anna Marks vs V H Ctilmtr ct al; Varian, Evans, Sutherland and King ,A G Sutherland and Arthur Brown, attorneys; attor-neys; law. 30 HvrumV Jones vs J V Stwart et al: Saxey & Whitecoitoo, King & Houtz, attorneys; Jaw. 3r Agnes I Rigpy et al vs John O Thomas; Saxey & Whitecotton, King & Houtz, attonneys; law, 31 B Darger et al vs St V LeSieur; M M Kellogg, Arthur Brown, attorneys; law. 33 Nathaniel Williams vs AF Whipple, Ceo Sutherland, Saxey & Whitecotton, attorneys; law. 34 D C Burrows vs Nephi McLean et a!; King & flout C S Varian, attorneys; law. 35 John C Snow vs W D Roberts; J E Booth, M M Kelkig, attorneys; law. 36 D B Reed vs Meadow Improvement Live Stock Co.; George Sutheiland, at torney for defendant; law. 37 Jens C Nielssen vs W W Brandon 2? Thomas Herbert vs Joshua Hone; M M Kellogg Saxey and Whitecotton. attorneys; equity. 24 Petition ol Isaac Fordonski for change of name of Lydia Fordonski to .Mary Jane Fordonski ;Saxey and Whitecotton, White-cotton, attorneys. 25 Kio Grand Western Railway Co vs Annatta C Larsen ct al; Bennett, Marshall Mar-shall and Bradley, Richards; Kolapp & Barton, attorneys equity. (To be Continued.) Friday, Fun. 20. The grand jury came into court and reporteJ the following cases ignored. I hiited States vs Thomas Stal'.worthy, Sen , Martin F. Crandal, H. F: Stall-worthy, Stall-worthy, Jr;, Hyrum North and Andrew Tolgretr The cases against Adelbert Cazierand Boliver II. Waits, unlawful cohatiitation, resubmitted to the grand jury. James Bartholomew arraigned on a charge ol unlawful cohabitation, and took the statutory time to plead. B. W Driggs came forward and changed chang-ed his plea of not guilty to the charge of adultery. Sentence was set for April 8. The grand jury came into court and reported six indictments and one ignored ignor-ed bill. The case of the United States vs I lenry Mower, charged with unlawlul cohabitation, cohabita-tion, was called and jury empanneled. The indictment alleges that Mr. Mower has lived with Elizabeth Mower and Rovena Jane Mower since 1S89 The indictment in-dictment was found by the last grand jury. Amy Garlic was the first witness. Live at Fairview. Know Mower and Elizabeth, also Rovenna . Mower, Elizabeth has been the first wife twenty-eight twenty-eight or twenty-nine years. Rovenna is his wife and has lived so for a long time. Elizabeth lives out of town a mile or two, and has not lived as his wife for fifteen years. Since then he has lived with Rovenna. Has a family and children with her. Am on good terms with Rovenna. The two families do not appear to be 011 good terms. Cross examined He married Elizabeth Eliza-beth about thiity years ago. He then had a wife Susan, whom he married in Nau-voo. Nau-voo. He lived with them both seveial years, lie married Rovenna about tiL'pntv-five vears atro. He has made his twenty-five years ago. He has made his home with her since then" Redirect I remember the fart ol Susan's death. Know nothing of Elizabeth's Eliza-beth's marriage afterwards to Mr. Mower. Elizabeth Mower Was married to the defeudeut in Nauvoo in 1851, Was married to him again or sealed in Salt I eke. We also w ent through a ceremony cere-mony later, in 1857, alter his first wife died. Have never been divorced. Suppose Sup-pose I am his wife vet. He dont do anything any-thing lor me now; has deserted me He has never called to see me except lately when he called about a divorce case I had entered against him. Ravetia Mower Man ied Mr. Mowei twenty-live years ago. One year ago last October I ceased to live wit'.-, him as a wife. We lived under the same roof. I married him by the church law. Have never been divorced. Cross-examined-Mr. Mower has lived at the house on ihe farm most ot his time for five years past. 1 le stays r.t my house more like a border not as my husband. Elizabeth was re-called and stated that Mower had never been divorced fr,ni tier, mi rl she did not know that tt al; Geo Sutheiland and W K Reid, Saxev & Whitecotton, and ZabrUkie, attorneys; law. 38 Sarah Mergan vs Aunie Marie Moore; Booth 4 Wilson, Saxev & Whitecotton, White-cotton, attorneys; law. 39 J J Arbecombie et al vs W W Jackson Jack-son etal;M-W Kellogg, King& Houtz, attorneys.law. 40 Alfred Tonilinson vs U P Railway Co,; M M Reikis, PL Williams, attorneys; attor-neys; law', , ,, " 4t Geo M Scott & Co. vs Deve & Soundberg et al; E A Wedgwood and Geo Sutheiland, J E Booth, attorneys; law. 42 A P De Camp & Co. vs Devev 4 Sundbergetal E A Wedgwood and Geo Sutherland, J EBooth attorneys; law. 43 Anna Maiks vs U P Railway Co.; P L Williams, attorney for defendant; law 44 CoroliiK F Bromley vs Rio Grande Western Railway Co.; Bennett, Marshall & Bradley, attorneys; for defendant; appeal. 45 I C Powell vs E H Parsons et al-M al-M M Kellogg George Sutheiland attor; neys; law, 46 Thos Broadhent vs Monroe Irrigation Irriga-tion Co.; V H McCardy, attorney for defendant; appeal. 47 Joseph hall vs Rio Grande Western Railroad Co; J E Booth, Bennett, Marshall Mar-shall & Bennett, attorneys; appeal. E0U1TV CALENDAR I Charles Crane vs B Watts et al; D Evans, Geo Sutherland attorneysjequity. a (two cases) Bullion Beck 4 Champion Cham-pion MiningCo vs F K Morris; Arthur Brown Bennett. Marshall" & Bradley, attorneys; equity. 3 F K Morris vs Bullion Beck & California Cali-fornia Mining Co.; Bennett, Marshall & Bradley, Arthur Rrown,attorneys;equity. 4 Louis Boukofsky vs John Creen'. v I Snyder, Bennett, Marshall & Brad'ey, attorneys; equity 5 II B Clawson vs F K Monis; Arthur Brown, Bennett, Marshall & Bradley, attorneys, at-torneys, equity. 6 Valentine L Thomas vs F K Morris; Bennett, Marshall & Bradley, attorney for defendant ;equity. 7 John Elliott vs John Bastian et al; Baskin & VanHorne, Arthur Brown and E B Critchlow, attorneys; equity. 8 lohaniiah Evenaud vs Hans Olson Irom tier, ana sue aia nor. Know wai she had been repudiated by him. The case rested King, for the defense, took the posi tion that there was no legal marriage between Mower and Elizabeth, and that she was not the legal wile. An argument to show the legality of the mariiage with Elizubeth was made by Varian and the case was submitted. Lorenzo F Herron was arraigned on a charge of adultery. Hetook the statu toiy time to plead. Samuel a Wilcox was arraigned on a charge of unlawful cohabitation. He took the statutory time to plead. Niels H Jenson was arraigned ortA charge of unlawful cohabitation. He took the stautory time to plead. The petit jury was discharged until Monday morning at 10 o'clock. et al; w K Reid, William Zabrskie, attorneys; attor-neys; equity. 9 Robert L Allen vsjohn Martin;HaII & Marshall, George Sutherland, attorneys; attor-neys; equity. 10 Spanish Fork City et al vs St V LeSieur; Le-Sieur; Saxey, King and Geo Sutherland, w H Dickson attorneys; equity. 11 Hans Poulsen vs Theo M Samuel-son Samuel-son etl; Sasey and whitecotton, King and Houtz, attorneys; equity. 12 R w Breieton etal vsTheo M Sam-uelson; Sam-uelson; Saiey and whitecotton, King and Houtz, ittorneys; equtty. 13 Cyrus H Spriggs vs Teancum Taylor Tay-lor et al; Hall and Marshall, Geo Sutherland Suth-erland .attorneys; equity. 14 Springville vs James Hawley;lIoutz and King, J E Booth, attorneys equity. 15 w R Smith et al vs Jonah Phillips; w H King and George Sutherland, Booth and vilson, attorneys; equity, 16 Thcman wright, jr vs Jos F wright el al; Sutherland and Judd, Marshall and Royle, attorneys; equity. u 17 Wrii R May vs Nephi Irrigation Co; Saxey & Whitecotton.King & Hout attorneyi; equity. 18 Joseph W Hetmott vs Jas S Perry et al; Ceo Sutherland, attorney for plaintiff; plain-tiff; equity. 19 Adams, Sons & Co vs P N Snoot-erup: Snoot-erup: Geo Sutherland, attorney for plaintiff; equity. 20 Jacob Houtz vs James Whitehead King& Houtz, attorney for plaintiff; equity- 21 Sarah A Shoebridge vs Jos A Thompson; Booth 4 Wilson, M M Kel logg, attorneys; equity. 2J S S Jones vs Ann Loetham et al; King & Houtz attorneys for plaintiff; equity- |