Show SMITH vs v SALT LAKE CITY OPINION or OF 4 r LA T territory of am kart OIL in C barb J vb south re hilt halt lake city po ila fondant fond nt kill ain ath the ald t lifting lif tinK n br b r ir W lion against e J ln er forfi jiter liean lin tun ati alio icaco for of ao an nor kt the tb I 1 to till court for a of injunction to birttrain the tl do aft ft edrit from further p lattray the ala till lilt OR on ties the 11 minued that tile hard sill court clar t mr f antra pro la 11 1111 libi has tho mil mid Ordin arRe to bo be mil II 11 binl and rout all other imi will in the kakiou of tile court coort jeaa go 1 I I 1 bottley p for far tile banow A roge HOK aall 0 o 1 l edoil fw far liked the le filide fili 1 dM bokr lt 1 lv busl at al ilia it I t enli form of ties I 1 it bird 1 t mr justice pre suding returns return il wr were undo to ariu tit of rot tevan ionn I 1 in natural buei I 1 tn jeur abdrin AD and el ju jo liw tm of abo alleged of ao ALL ordinance orl macu hr lec arnink and taug tile manufacture and sale ul of vinous and 1 billu lil lu still also in ll 11 it bell bad judgment tor for all lossl V ciul viul of I 1 kill a concerning arkel AI xiii J all let 1 in tho the cua or of bai la klisto IwA A ro sult lake laic city ODO of f thu casesi rigny lauder ilia lint hakimi onlin mw wu walk ton len dawl M fol loira by tile two lass u 0 o the b moors for consideration aul I 1 and after thio dus as thereon it wu a d by t the coart that jr jor oil cliffon Cli 11 afon on A LI office justice of ali r leac hall no la a tile pro loam said ail that tile ordal lale or of ball bait llo lah fitt city entitled ean an ordinance ud and Ti litin the lad and uto to of spira tuo dot mil liquors iii as null nall mid vold void mid ordinance not being ill ail of maebo itimus tj in ilia chat ter ler of mid city two aws of jamb butth ut th rt art oj of r to suu noll alo tell t y notice bark la culliman liman f cou ou zeroing g maason judg jud clients won lus follows ther jlii call coming comine on oil to be aicard on the dy day of april A A 1 1872 the I 1 laul tiff appealing by byj J beet icely 70 Job johnkin luton ri their attorney iHor ncy iland alio liy briw aud aoge kaan ltd and it tho 1 hii I allmeyer all lio moyd for tho parties agro cawing cing that uio the argument now to to milde ly by coun t in the cow of Chart lil 1 4 laah nall ai lul lay and nl ilia th of thu cobit jinn t th burcon should grene and ime IN hy fly ix hi parties fall a and ro celled AS tho the decision of thus co 11 vt herem 1 the th chuao n la to for lion and doc dockton knon and after dao dae thereon abortion it wu wait hr by tho the court that jifca clinton Clinto iii alteman Alilin nao mid ex X donicio justice of ilia peace lud lad no jurisdiction in the ihben wi hium takes unit that the th ordinance of S bulb a it inn lale ey city ciui tiui leil an Orda manoo licen 9 id and lating the manufacture anti pair it notia lotous dinou and kermen tod Liquor Pi it oil nejl and lid voll vold faid aid ordinance out dt being in pursuance of authority graut cabit tue the charter 1 0 I ditl aid city it will IA be me tint flat in bold ter of these brumit is in the orth mra adjudged to bo be null and nd void but bot ilia co I 1 for the plain alcides fault in 10 the lut cited in judgment about to Iho huor Is a cle racial vr arror elan and that the market lica ordinance fl as in to ler if this be so 0 o tho record me caa he bo arduith ear or really corrected iu in this in manner imater allt US ua B it if tho the position I 1 i probably lly correct la in the portions on oa which the writs of mak arl ibero allo wild in the two 0 cattle of jacob smith ft et fit at VA r ball bait lalo lako city as i ca bonn were taken to tho the judicial jiJi dl authority jet clinton Clin tOD Aldi ninan bull of abo reaco but no point ia ml to tit of tle the aul ill ud it tho the ret aimis to write do 10 not show how that kny any IT question aid WM was balaka as anthe jtb validity vali dily of that ou on tho the trials alforo tile tho aul mad clinton chatton thia court cannot assume lit ilat mr justice atral fiand to p PAM uon dion the validity of ill an ordinance which drw w not hot in ID the isdora him anti winch which was really not LIM ufa upon u from A alia entry or of in abe tiff nu as tai party larty mr life justice oc caitiff vai lit at t 0 little an tu tau alder an an and ex the ilia aft illa tip I 1 no opinion iu in tartar of near pulst uio the M r let ordinance TIL application tor for a writ tit of injunction li is based tip epou tho on BUpp ground that thab tile tha mulat ordinance juul to u tw be igual nuu tand T abr than P boulion po ram ulion boll liag as erro 1 to q ull othor were it correct t able w woold id lo 10 a suo crime iu in which bich KA a in 10 join coald lauc nor would if bo ta in this to expect mf any opinion AS to the validity or invalidity or of the ud aid markot ordinance tito tho above stu reat the ju judicial alz auti vent of joler chloo clinton and rf clI officio fecto justice or of tho f but the actions alkine brought age fint I 1 ault tho the P bat ban bin were JOs jo C lill ton justice of so a OHIO ort loial whom arity n not 00 then than tinder croud all nation if the plaint Lur is wrong sao no doubt is bi a remedy for that wrong sarong hut bill upon the suite of fall th ho hit 1 at of ila J a kau ui IS not that reali rc Dirdy vily it u dod |