OCR Text |
Show BRAND NEW POINT IS RAISED ON ALIMONY Important Question Comes Up in Case Wherein It Is Alleged Marriage Mar-riage Was Void. The suit of Mrs. Lydia Glaze for annulment an-nulment of her ninrriane to Herman IT. tila.o aud to recover $1.10 from the defendant de-fendant on the ground that their marriage mar-riage was illegal furnished yesterday the newest fine points of law "upon alimony ali-mony to come up in the divorce matinee of the Third district court. The plaintiff contends that when she was married to the defendant ho had an undivorced wife living in California, yhe alleges that she advanced the defendant de-fendant some money. The claim of $150 is designed to cover the loan and to remunerate re-munerate her for services as a housekeeper house-keeper during the time that she lived with the defendant as his wife. Counsel for the defense contended that no alimony could he allowed since no legaJ marriage eonld have taken place. According to the evidence introduced, intro-duced, the former wife of Glaze had obtained only an interlocutory decree of divorce in a California court at the time of the marriage of the plaintiff and defendant here. The question as to whether or not the plaintiff might be allowed the jUoO asked under an order for alimony in connection with an order of annulment of marriage, rather than divorce, blocked further proceedings in the case until the contending attornevs shall have submitted authorities. Judge P. C. Evans Ev-ans allowed them until Friuav to do so. Divorces were granted ve'sterdav to May Willis from Josenh Willis. Gladys Wagner from John J. Wagner, Florence Jenkins from (leorge Jenkins and Dora Bennett from Silas Bennett. |