Show I AFFIDAVIT VII FILED S SEN IN CASE Stewart Stewart ln l' counsel tl for Peter convicted of the murder of or James S R. R lIa Hay ha C have an lt In support Ort of or f the thc motion for or a mW trial f for r their clientS client which was wall made several eral days y ago aJo It Is set put In tho the affidavit lt that the thc trial was as as I held it hI In III the the- absence defendant de- de to In support which the attorneys point out the thc tact ac that thit Mort en was absent at the tho time when the Jurors Juror examined ex ox- ll Ih the promises premises and further claim that thal somi som of oC the Jurors rn measured oC off certain cel tan tain distances lanes for Cor or the tho purpose of ot using the thc same as evidence e In the tho trial and that thal they consulted with one another the case cali on the premises awa away aval from rom the defendant and out of or court In conclusion It it-is it I that Stewart Stewart have asked Royal Roal B. B Young Sheriff Naylor and anI Deputy Sheriffs ArnUl Ar- Ar flop nur and anet Bull to make affidavits to the tho facts set out but that thai the they have hn refused and accordingly ly It Is a asked ked that the they be bo cited In court and examined with wah reference reference refer refer- ence to the thc matter |