Show ASKS PERFORMANCE OF THEIR CONTRACT Frederick C. C Osgood commenced two mining mininG suits suit today One Is against the Calumet Hecla Hecla and Muscatine Mining 5 and Milling company oC ot St St. Louis Loul Mo and William T. T M McFarland Osgood claims that on September 20 20 1001 JOI he contracted ced with the company through McFarland Its Is i agent to lease lese twenty nine l mining claims In the Ru Rush Hush h valley mining district district district dis dis- dis- dis of Tooele count county that h by the tho terms of the lease he was to have the privilege o of purchase for payable paya paya- ble In Installment installments within m months after the deposit of ot the de deed deM d of conveyance He states that the thc lease WI was wac del deposited In escrow elrow in the Commer Com Com- Commercial mer mercial lal National bank and that the company company was WIS to deliver delve a deed dee to the prop property rt within ninety days Plaintiff states that he Is willing to deposit the money and asks that the court order the comp company nY to deliver the mining property properly to him along alonG with wih its Is books records and corporate seal neal The other suit Is against t the Consolidated Consol Consol- Consoli Consoli- dated Mining company couman of ot St St. St Louis Luis and William T T. 1 McFarlane and Is for fora a similar agreement with regard to the Ophir group of ot fourteen claims In tooele county Bounty for tor a a. a consideration of ot j |