Show k I ’ - " - 1 lt:’ - 4 dx I : - r fl - - -x - - —A - -- ? I '1 "14 UMP x' kr £ LxS7 1 'Ji t- 'T' z Z S'" - v I : trPD ATnPPbTTPTfnAN'-QAT'T’ u UJJX XAXIMnUlZ'AVUA ni TU ?'? AXXM - ! - i - AtTPHTTV UA T X X XIXIUXJ i - - i‘4 - j All U j j i j CTTMnAV UU1117A Tim ATT X X X IQl’ IQ TTTKTV U11U1U U ‘ ’ 1U11 l " " ' ADVERTISEMENT i- h AY S : 1 if - - GREAT pussi Die lead us pitfal Us into freedom and for of individuals the It widespread present theories the of agitation dreamers is of J 'SVs It Copyrighted ' f Igllby fana wide their experience wisdom’ have graeraily-tuaccept tH jjeolesafer for is questionjihajjbrbughi liquor the T - ‘-Y" ' - z ? K " -7- 1”'- a - and serious in ‘ ‘ - I 17 I f - r ? ! i- positions those been The results the of history have who cisastrpus cases some of the in arid tried in natid found finalq inevitable beitworthy to coercive of to attempt thi for I “Nothing with buch law by of the in stances the “O ' their of enforce and of them from Noo the gression’ on equi the law which ough d rights founded a of into entering upon sooner sustain not apprised 'of right the give! we up urai ABRAHAM will “Prohibition is It trol a that things the at blow any liquor sold voted use crime?’- COUNT ocal governed Elected times member a “I “Why to ure cannot i ? religious regulate resistance effort to fbrms they where Why its province enact tq tending be to OLIVER - was BAiiQ he the of he “I opposed to amj opposed to 'its' advocates by made -a matter or pride he will see liberty which he this claims of test love true mere oe erty iipei complete COMPLETE but HIS Wide alike not 4 that ! the of dismal law in religion and WRONG the those! matters if conscience is ON WHETHER be to !0R DEMOCRATIC BUT ITAS BIGOTRY AVI ITCH IN THE DOWNALL HON ‘ - should “I ADDEUS! TH American fivi Served if CHIE ACTOR in legislation have seen reformation world SAMUEL GOMPERS it tried been 4howu Inere not the is 4 all buy whatever beer to of is can that bu you am cannot into our city is arc prohibition The in lieve lais have “tire when humble be to I Just Jist of we have 'done come' that one the I of know a Even and it is people” the crime a sale into it buy to liquor of for and if the and officers the lost he I sympathy the of ntrn ri 1 1i2 1 I linf c i Vatican J is possibly since ng I to I ly pr the the you 01 if ought not rolled conf I MVUV14 people as to tn fniHriatinn alb- which of ' men mupn sized rignr Sori cannot agree is en-en is Christian turned “You the in not of state but you I saloons” of£ x- tree Ot scriptur for i p i X that - alone -t and W X the the upon V: AUTHOR AND believe that law i-i-x the irovemment history Phavo as the taking of i "days and STATESMAN the church looking to alike are the its history of extorting to purchase of they do think not NEW T it that ion city ivifk Ifor for and ate bishops five there WILLIAM EUSTIS RUSSELL nas jrroiiioiiion by and repealed een i-tried its EX-’gOV i this tin i state thoroughly confessed failure” failure’ - snonsorsias a Hon EVIDENCE O Charles J Bonaparte nannttA TIt Dr 1 4 “Prohibition 1 - 1 ct vi has A disastrous been ancc elix a1iv Aril Adler at by ITY via is against joo-ainst including prohibition -nTiViihi-tinn Preside! as no is in also nlon -www-w A -11-— t to Eljbt thq Va J the of wliat AND woifnen of I HOME by 1 of my thtf with hands prohibitionists they mix good -join in wrong that far So as themselves in to gifts are of because' ZrW H 5 wrong manufacture God Wejre- - of bad” an J REV is saloon here that method of and eties did ' are of majority a it is rights people our : because legitimate its j YOREL merely not be to tena- demand who have men it constitution A HOMAN equal rights J ' 1 can never ikn4 on tne the plea tnat it of rights is iior me many of gooa notjre-gard aoes strictly ' moderate ' not net It UI llv r came 3 I 1 nnid dr single lin 1 1 1 1 condemned c only quantity and of LxI a 1 L W ’ xlS i O - n ROCK LITTLE — maiiy many - - that 1 I 1 1 1 ' tb 1 1 1 T -1 4 1 J ul 4 Ik 4- to wquld have worship?” ZX ZV ZX fini Ik m! disturb - O ST peace Wk Z Z k z’ 91 k k iL-i I fityc my more I 1441 mate beer? has he the k ' ther p right ' g man I the mode! a city condit prohibit j360 of stop ’ to A idn state A placing Pba(' pulling Wk CT rierj -inrli-rnfliTal v Tk W tl state lidver been " an 1 ly j 11 ardfcnf Vll C I 4 an£ jjlace the who oias n temner- t44 LA it la an CV4 sincere CT ct TOTAL U for of 11 4 U 4x v whereH to a S LC will v vz XA iu longer no ’’ t j x x-f-ll Potter z4 of of others z—- ztlk Nevf zof the stake 1at4-T f - ri L Seth York zznk4z4 the greatest ’ll' ’Ul men! vzw x f X1U r XI I allow U !of my MEN’S of jr de- lilt T-’ would in! t this 4-lk4x nation 'ikzu I- JlxJ diid I -L- ASSOCIATION i f vqted of years -sad I for bill a A? a 4-have ach inot and I believe prohibition jealously” these prepared am unjust in liberties our to laws at are JI j TT crumble GEO BARTHOLDT constitutents fvn oyav the the in H butnot IM iu j else by ARCHBISHOP “It 3 ijis only from Thpanno mnvpd -T Hon abroad Cartoil ?? T - the insane mn-n I — JX LUC ' t- lOCUl ' AUSTIN all of upon legislation” GLENNON ex-Commissioner i prohi- 1 that my IOD ’Op of lib- yiL TEXAS ' life’ my own I stem-! J : ! J drink must avzLa fnnat Wright D ? 1L 1? vaunted-boast O man for vote to me rwwzxOrt Americans’ dust” MISSOURI O ask KINSOLVING anybody on ' ’ I- do 3 CHICAGO have been almost total a abstainer perfect right to iput prohibition “I $ I -WZCJ BISHOP f at dealing Columbia my prohibition I of three or mistake” SAB ATH10 guard uij xvtAuiU0u in Maryland erty bei reI ” of - Labor "I ' t "f UTAH O I 1 AA vx -passes have i President x- I 1879 in Legislature Two realized I in Missouri T 3 J ! Kansas proposition passage we must and bill - ' Lowj SCOTT amendment before CONGRESSMAN 1 1 1- LEGISLATURE - ! ' BUSINESS - such “If-inV the inti --uiaLLer jim-Iw this ' -hot ? -'llj bestimethood the of believe do - j the KANSAS CONGRESSMAN EX-SUPi prohibition of passed any With -I rsTTT Veil member prohibition fight tlie? k it u or most country ? z the “I the I k n eat the ' T- a j protect my Jx’xxll Vz advocate as lira 0XlX1AlAi - EX-MEMBER “As experience zkf a Mil jl laws increased 1 IT 1 1 j INDIANA ATnnxrhi x-lictxjwij - judgment my l !--' Bishop thousands 1 borne add ix q n — VI - drink tiiiHsi question iiiiK) matter as ioti Methods 'wiLii so iriaiiL tiriiiK conditions Th of work must be adapted to meel the present To Ons people law to p’orce of zrthd thd character attempt people any orce a upon in will fail its against' theiit protest Laws purpose cannot be xt !! £ enforced sUStsainine- L successfully! without nublicJsentiment’ a - of io 1 a-mtt hpwever ii sires Zk LORIDA TAMPA O to-observe RIDDLE R ' desnise are TTk EVANSVILLE xri’ Xlx 1 ” - Z HELT C I t If- j jiabstainerto vx j and to? 1ao4 drink11 I raixi:iwixtiwuiiiwx T law Vk k T-Di7KrmrxTTkr jL have led me jlaw?i These proper k ’ 1X1 kcal our yice so I 1 SIMONTON M O saw v ‘L ’f" of haunts 4ll4a 4 in w OA AM AV ilk1 nur And the nQQ M A M V V vO risw V be him 11 - -i confess ‘a M zkZX a a a a m a constitutionA which m Sour iuiv politic! mtiij xi4muv ujjpcui© uunaumuuu a jaw moVals ond morals and impractical in politics” imprnetieal Zka in W DR REV - means the of k bad be be to around IIaIaGCI v TkAtaa uw a A"f a rnOti'a build - XZMXk should he have! I principle 2 Wkl Jllffll A V V— -nvHAr elsewhere-4 liKo'rTr V ion ( rv -“You -jf PRES CATHOLIC SOCIETIES AMERICAN work 11 ATI vzm A0X11XI AU XXbX10XMXOil cahnot dictate to a! man what he shall for when you attempt to you are undermining the of constitution portantyfoundation stone of A-W j iiiicrcased r zx ’ must your than 4 AU B'—J 5 Inlidbitants 000 I vuou theef-feet excellent had opportunity an and' In of the prohibition laws an Georgia Tennessee Chattanooga the saloons fpr the sale of whisky wine and beer they-i city of in the Tampa and ’the are as are is that the in difference saloons only Chattanooga apparent license” !" pay-no prevailing but lawlessness attempting moralityby thatjurge mcjasi a total of remain 1V1A144A11 J us-widejopen 'I OKLAHOMA ions CITY ‘were time” temberanfee for "Txifor oqjd --- inert X ttm c 4x - and prohibit experiencebf 1'fiTYlOlH win being rhn - j-i ho v w aw duucahcoouhthe w xaaj aaaxxaa in not outside from where to H w — ' wisdom us TTTlll WVXAX and hnv rfhAVA mother I? ' “I t of cei'y C0NALTY the his ui ' of But' adopted waavaa aIi z fViA fr - JUDGE ! breweries residence in months’ j v reason 1 gleatnes its of -4 k- It3 ne 11V 1 n JUVi lrvAnr minds t Lt - be TTrh dcaao-vva ! Z Z W that is a niM'fi cn V with inmience i ! MISSOURI LOUIS OKLAHOMA five'years’ T k— 7 home "li 4- 4-n ' drunkenness in atha nonie in'lJlV w s 4 asjGodgives li - ’ is i con-grcgation Wk my WWk H j grltest surprises to hachhoped prave my boy long j z4 1 ’ - C LUIS ui nwftL J the in or should temperance icmaiha kl nlinfif can '1 J the -4 I fee” kZ z j drinking 4cpf — my i than lv irl HAM? tlMUU ' k bJJmEEKER “ I 1 Z ' nnv any ajplliice n j such Krn 1 cannot you UTAH O mind my -out loor W 1 rniniSTPr iinuisxer a us ’r of J I ria i are 1 Tknvn nai V Aja J a il drink jY L where a i) L f zk SPRY ivgiaiuiu a muianij from the heart iu must’cbme i-i ARK t - a strongly as than more they--f ! in m 1 I lUipostiiyiU i- that Ik X UW 1 V It HARTLEY lk 4 HglVU-iMHU j- - ABSTINENCE CT k me I- " 'X’ 1 V any men assert as You fit see ? other the much as contend they WILLIAM question Utah will if into men and defend to them” into isjho1 people e crime who-will drink drinkers morality or of - of to drink to GOVERNOR ' right not are right happiness ih-f quat-4 ine : who a virtue "legislate 4 - proportion very perfect a have “TliereJ joyou a men they legislate T large have 2 the add-to to If is and? please runk1- 1 voice hi’ up IIplcoriimencbdhisnubIiA-mini4-Jz considerable there 111(3- lifted saying they that 4 Ul Celling instance o!l ojf Jolib ’qf a in? Salt Senator Sutherland in jthe interruption came horse stealing?” preventing difference Horse stealing is a The horsethief does not try has he right to steal while a on vice ' hand i ! ! UTAH O the you drinking! by himself fthat an’ ani those ’ I ‘ tell is lleiempha-betweeh them iiig— H nk i in in' 1 T “1’11 I '' and senator thb I Methods His The by 1910 an “How about follows: ps language: answered following r in delivered 5 j- f- SUTHERLAND GEORGE speech a : I ’ -November h a i i City Lake law 1 puonc millions j them a s During 1 men le nypoc r i at ATHER reasons rk4 A against ugajLLiau mKe classes country cause zv4 of I -j — j - I 11 1 : - drinkers” r?i MAINE ’ its to guaranteed enforce hoped to be ‘ 'C't'' ' all ‘Where the ( but-be- 1 REV under - drinking young join in I ' ' NEW O stay to believes it what REEMAN E 1 offe wnien ' r the ot account anything' ' 1 i LJ nrnrtkp AUTHOR AND 'EDITOR II If Jesus lived He He age l! and use on' prohibit sale and iise therb high! favor ’ J 1 I principle a not of 1 fjav! children and 44 Wisconsin' Rev the Lutheran of I iuiiaixcibinj ali-pf? total f attention’’ that in seen farce : a as Harvard rJziwizxevidence ctri h V ORPHAN LUTHERAN O I x ' prohibition Hft C that evils-of great organized by KEIGHER o4 difficulties consistent (J: MANUACTURERS A clubs i O the to of Milwaukee my town saloons and thirteen 2600 andimy ISLAND - L J- RHODE J ” 1 ja j the ' j tem- ii I SENATOR PORTLAND O - “Ihavejscen popular between’ a O is Mi: nrinCiriles is - fraud cpnsrrainea thp drunkenness I : is the of cious 5B ?htly drinking REV f CLARK r i DU - jman Milwaukc Milwaukoa in WISCONSIN ? COMMITTEE THE ki i BISHOP ' 1 THE victL tctw ct MASSACHUSETTS enacted - : ’ ISLAND LONG O - as “The ualnonffra nt 1 I of the presenttime eatest millhcy This nation has attained majority 'ccogniiidn of the inalienableright a are that have our : create krlTMol in said things this CHICAGO 1 wle its in reached BAY j-’ the following' by and been misled! misrepresentation it of those cent who use cannot : J TTnvn rmiwIv nvnr ennn ever avurveiy seeiir jjuvv interfere with the l business Pil Back operation violators OREEJI gard misuse - in ineffectual ears’ manyyears’ manyy oiiicials -Ha z- WASSON EISSELDT He Episcopal I it nrnmotn OJ f against diiikiner Wk the “One I ’ tn - gi1 REV ? in are not -i privileges of been been there lihertiv rpfnrm tpuineranfifi tmA pan Lutheran conference recent the stand selected to state was of misuse produce f I 1 x true - use-liquor principle their f YORK wl infnrfnmnnn money by immunity” OX O BISHOP “I framedA U-crrJ ife h wit DENVER O of clergymen they although - lavor need ? denomination are bpmy favor a temperance sane jbe-7 prohibition movement the have ’“‘Ve ' 'n:rt inn’ id a JACOB from ! 1 O ( i 1 A use into c coeorced be ' xiiue a in fim and consistent — soc A M keeper stop mo I T be can unfair ‘discrimina it be has used as will or law T j I w of I If fermentation of the Master them 1 DOANE JL nut ana ' rnovemeiip who desire arrested the DR - Z j BISHOP "No such nvntnmnnf kn 1 ZX 1 right wine of YORK as i pius w u - the “At ? am 1 " citizens its ivo cannot would 7 tconLinn- are CARL Ai-cause J have xxx People nof ' per Eissfeldt clergy 1 - !t then uxxvzxx or I statute J I ' 1 “The : put they V - is 1 rnri -tvnll bj ought do should any or of people REV ? to except we I - the of ion l The appear is is is through ! NEW t prohibition ' 1 - i right ZS to prohibition and good after aliens witnessed but a closed state stupid as as ' and uiiu it it than more than KRETZMAN E do to less prohibition to I ¥ N i pcinllCJJ j RYAN j REV " " I failure” violates it Abraham Isaac and from ic Jacob the found of strength to present hour w lore can a nation be hot be trustedto regulate and progress whose peoples could daily for themselves?” habits civilization and MILLS ’ of And -ohibition because t 3" o I HERSCH wine s REV: 1 they for the dealing with drink evil in methods nted with falsehood dishonored generation are ta discredited by and unreality and widespread RTTT prohbton O whether £ ar -or - day days — — princi Ibpened of n 11 1 grcgation rights our' of Most essential AMERICAN and t one on social all day 1 H saloon CT being into POTTER laws J tendency i 1 thi C( more angels’” i violation ( :' '! I LYMAN ABBOTT Hriinbnrrl drunkard uruiiKiuu minnnt in quitepattern BROOKLYN I intended WTTTTAXr ths -five " trie-quest 1 i- BISHOP freeedom H I prohibitory wine nor cause saloons s“Pvcrvrhip e there arc knows known arc aUd 1 g£ orderly where TIpeople perfectly lawabiding JH k congenial their beer in pcacc?withAi companions aiic PHILADELPHIA O crime -z TW f i -Ninety ’ - were making VERY please- 14 THE jts : vledecoqtions and ! Diyine accomplish its desired end which is anything Maine name” in mnTiTnn Ann TENNESSEE nnnnca BLANCHARD i by !a wine”i pto Ipeople legislate cannot does water nearly or ho S' scripture openiy ’ than process the apd HOMAN BISHOP in- fleets the crirqe -' O ’ to their on jsj “ think who j ? Many ! jthe MILWAUKEE" J I saiegparu Mnh nnrnn but never of try ity WISCONSIN because created religion he- those wrong God's of one a with the to and 1 1 years condemnatic ! u-IhpIi t lO TON mentioned i-r oi uuse corruption! ‘enness or " GR scriptun I liquor sell to w posed jh ‘ good O : distinction Jbnn Baptist l elnbs ' BISHOP ic cause - I PAUL cona r-f : A -that I moderation in 1A the unaer I 1 ' 1 for j there-’ not are dbing in ' PTV “ou W? -bt ! im-icnce J infringe traffic - DUBLIN O evils’’ the the TEXAS or ‘ 1‘I £ “It not was abstinence total must a with N nf O curtail liciior the in engaged nave-as JOHNSON to iking i An tnnn I :i 1 ' commu-to law whatever demoralizing morp last the be dn: j REV DIVINE agree and J - Ui them less enlist to general An qwncs ’ lor it illegality — NEWARK O tthp BISHOP would ‘I the cvcrv nieans individual for I of and r is and 4-Jk fected” itself -EI'I leads i such things may drink LINE' S be Scholar O WEBB " riithm DR tew very risy h right” and i J rtion V00RH !ESr VOORHDESI warrant 1 CONGRESSMAN DnnClDH holy political our z by mforced” is personal were under 1 i ‘I drink to Turks law opposed wrong make nnk-lw 1 in iL1' dhan An GAILOR : eyes selling nrnofiep prohibited large a NOTED I “Our ” sClt-govej-nmeut - be of in 'Js f - T wine’ TT ? inlLi di I effect x’ laws wpuld and! i j REV a II BEECHER all --J I is - j we virtually was in worst io k i 1 foundationjof j Ijdo xu the right S WHATELY the x z ine icrizeo all people 1 V understand enforce itemn n3t j ! J eipjvyeu “My prescrioe came principle of rora both” It liquor 1 : that oqst f i not uiemseives law The state ‘‘Prohibition be there hhamefur inc hiiu xne 1 ht for siiuuiauc ' what LW wine f Is ' moderate: i po a yiSHOP common O using- existed harm RABB and and law ko ton state forbid the msociety or the fts in thft fri gifts in the rierht God’s right tn to Tn RD DAP Ji’vilnol dividual use manner cannot-condemn the sanctions Bible and permits we moderate! liquors of the TheBible permits therefore we use unjust force in this Andythe use of cannot condemn such use by prohibition hypocrites andsneaks Never direction breeds I prohibitory isMimpracticablp — many due respect tempcranee BALTIMORE 1 1 uni th0 - traces misleading- hpa B“t 4 rri-It ’! Tflvoi i reason freer - --What : Italy and where rance results h:fnn frmn the the to is say xlthat x have' charac ' sa- well-nigh well-h basis intelligence the a Christ 9 - that CADMAN r REV i MASSACHUSETTS O endeavor that and believe PARKS j more ition hidd m of license ipublic tjie bring affairs tllie 1 1 keep bf the SAVAGE M talk t drunkard? j1 tl’- 1 BISHofe TiTnrrAri manufacture i A To ngme ’ the O CITYj t sufficient wo ess YORK ONEW am free first Amprion llltfl IVa xi A14OU vu that freejom for moYal ends! distaste for liquor by law” a t iL the of i li k do employed are stinence diminishing I ' reason rnilwr LW ' ‘ maintaining ivegaroing intemperance - m f - The you enact a ends generally it that they been than - OKLAHOMA evils pvho -r iiu a !t IT - and lands? 'S t k pressure other results arc rbc no domestic I at the niy ” TARTP DANIEL of in! vou business whose SIXTH PRESIDENT UNITED STATES MILLS oppose Tlindnmpntal without al you I Shall sav that is because ‘majority the ADAMS is “The evil prohibit to papa fiuucuirs cniorcc in not orget irr “I f cxcessive S seril liliis WARD HENRY say" is but anyone’s ARCHBISHOP PEORIA O - ? A J Jj common false is 1 those always clergy righteous- the drink do to Ameri r privilege” privilege Author V :of part me th ? I H fall” -malrp-nflP RICHARD BISHOh do likes - ' iv ana institutions of temperance can -fl aside be it their MANNING ' “Prohit I Self-government - tVA V to I Q all CUI A preach the the hi stand?’ to 1 ’or where states crime 1 ROGER cs is :consequentially lead re- Thev the In- wrong legislated is Caesarisr by tive to' “When --’IL — a drink dr ? jliolyoke in 1 the in that myself convince cntial to morality XThe a of even putting remember ether ao unpopular nave such laws of enforcing? them has becomcmorc k “ evil ’ QUINCY JOHN or originalevil enforce have them to the 1 form not vems s tl know the Holiness Then nity ase f it which A T 1 Jesus Christ drank the policy which claims deals the that that with name: name REV believe ?-w of sin " “the when knowl for “As they t sin ' to -rf I ’ HARKINS' I1V- '4 j vi 1 4 for doomed REV “ x- EDWARD personal personal mans add dice almost ! 1 z l- appetite alcohol on men alone commend itself tb cannot Mohammedan i)t reg- no J lie liqUor they intdxicating thenu must either was nojt an ifjthey selves silly really believe or must very ignoranland be fostering a piousf riiud in the hope of deluding the simpl into is right! what false under pretenses And piojis frauds pro?-hibitionists u pie been countries wine no 5 J to much opposcdqto mail's I side is of “I C- ” super- point wv here duiul has oath and there an of abuse liquor more to in -tv it j in vii z 4 1 RAINSORD DR drink and- farmers I and any no sin dnn4 hot does hot claim His’ His A more police anritisulVto ‘ if ' the j is all Oklahoma as t: BROOKS -l and a reupon the sand be good may accomplished the which superstructure iwill bailors we Ml possioie-to with man a it ’ the strictly here is to k-rkzw xuibeuuuas ct i ft : o ! ’ the police to any JAMES 'GIBBONS Rome as that4 ! prohibiting! it method drink in His It and c and not ARCHBISHOP j - tt?4 ct of - I 1 4 nn i AX kX urc to loon : Prp- MEERSOHAERT- drunkonnessH thn A : inrrpflqp' an k for aeuueraie w i- IVO C REV C i I’ is - was no ' pever nothing that after( went God of grace the than 'jurious right the or of — -xz ' ( Diocese or EGNEUR state a aua itl -for i L fwrt 4 a w 4 ?n r mot am “I ' main v f r jmake never was prohibition ot x 4 4 l rk t order therefore WIS brings brings under There ettects - 1- ' In rule if people the - CARDINAL MONSI ! A semi-imevery l- o -4 matter oi ft is A z- 4 nld b nd in n i oi P-°?er nr or 1 taken - - for of ’ be W‘ Maine save remember nver 'amounts policy liquor 'sell to the vith passec b( has state-early crime ’ been shall we “If dictatorial thatlChrist ahead going and mischief SPAULDING personal! k 4 - law law actually Maine? lhe 1 vice KT- - to : by bv men intoxicants ft “I ARKANSAS thefstate upon private have TEMPERANCE Club Reform reform reform '1 T x 4 f unlicensed iJ An vice d prepaid is nrinps A A j X i vd there aieo hohe ot dernned attempt operating no - BISHOP be could forthis it proper that America abstinence occasional use and not but marshal now hynocrisy: mercy mercy remember Now try thp if -hitman -when 1 51 r i t the is and IjircrA liminr aaat WAV' Q xkzwu W lunatic asylums poverty ora A Jthe A KzVA system Z-X j MILWAUKEE! brought: maiiv DrouiriiL many — law for ilhs-j Drunkenness : of with 111dealinstance pature special jform of any various innuences total can and go has It 11 drinking i of on CARDINAL fault finding with other method any cannot! oi "icets but reach men’s appetite The of saving men it is well Legislature cannot cor trol a man’s! appetite While do to certain things by act of Legislature there to undertake that Legislatures cannot do is things it and are to no use I a bear calling “I Labor 1 places JWORKER veil is It save thatithese INTERNATIONAL become to right not that apt are X Temperance irst law in sale i I Organized “We pact he law” the and the O erect L J X it adopted : MRS'- versal 'I : observers Catholic fi 1 before” °eiore ' -to tip seeking is ana happier : where astrangcr he Therc wants whisky MURPHi RANCIS 1 not as-for that that tyranny convinced f a jlrqhibitic threatened O THEOPHiLE REV far-more more enthronement — ifficult rade c to attempt CT CT ’ f 1 a no dor regulation its VERMONT interes oi evil to and prohibition wherever be regulated by law can on ' -of ARCHBISHOP for of thp gt the inmates a net i 3 A I’ I VIRGINIA WEST can of pcoplmhave 1 ' : Kansas Underground BROWN in 4 ’ll ' '- Bishop respect principle luiijjuib x O -! an arc drunkenness” of is “There ederation of use this icense HALL 1 profoundly am intemperance t Maine or folly saloons wr L - ui disguise violation in :x city a the that and 1 r-n subjection it tne to cvn American President has “Experience has and a havehigh drives movement that I- way the it to blessing great idea) dream an a only BISHOP -I ncss sort -not the have ' ideal n t io hibitory DRUNKARD of L I that w : J : j : - i' sale open RIGHT over opposed for laws be H : -I U TVMU4 I we ij TT “Holiest freedom can van Axueuum VEST am is is BISHOP tried! it CT W against many ‘ by if impracticable violation much is 4 Is that 4viazl tt’l-icTz i rnumAa it piaKing1 cure jnore to the impossible regulatq and H of quality liquor sold” tried in I do believe and vain laws had effect to in stop abuses sumptuary ever any I in the When State any country was a was young man ‘Legislature (Pennsylvania)? and moved that the sale of liq-be prohibited in district! and the motion uor carried my was T did not find that I thereby made ONE Only! the drink the LESS They would they had more when is bther by chance There for the no thn moral suasion I I brought bar it to 4 Congress could the I I prohib- surreptitious the SENATOR existing better HUH 1 STEVENS--- National J that adoption i Leavenworth Prohibition would indeed it‘is seeKs Statesman terms glad be THE present “Prohibition ITSEL GLOOMY 4 - I v THE O Ik 4 that that to to i ! ANTI-RELIGIOUS MAY NATIONS” SO O j accomplish not i kAC4 heal th Zk SSEMER ME according' according’ liquor vision” un uuu the nronablv as where prohibition is widespread there as states authorities have hesitated whore the authorities other the reason intellect or IS BEEN pvujno that would v v f Lqf toIia zl ! believebelie ve- not inere freedom prohibition in temporary it state anv in fe’ j protest IV do all of '' J- f- t i hibition Philosopher constitution I THAT ANTI-DEMOCRATIC MANIESTATION A those LEAD for room OR RELIGIOUS I and states tins country: enforced Hpwever NEIGHBOR religious of s a-T O : i-t - h there and liquortraffic opinion HIS zk i of Bishop failure enforce as receive will MAN TO PROVIDED ONLY exist KXi ttr r 1 in and ± Ik! its of most ' “I “1 i 1 ft ?” country MAINE O 17' ARCHBISHOP’ this in CT VI l T direction tuiivng uur I believe to 4 earnestly moft i the 1 : nAfriJno eimnln DONOHUE legislationa just '--Q ?i- '’Absblute eaucauon EACH ’there if “I ’ andtheir I is virtues himself others in alco- floodgates -a il' BISHOP I destiny BITTER INTERNECINE HATREDS BASED EARNESTNESS SUCH ARE SIGNS NOT DIERENCES O O ANATICISM-WHICH BELIE BUT THAT growth but OR must stunted be to for of matters in belief social and are thht X- Author to j possible” is 1 : it the - MICHL liAJN feels Yvliich 1 ' O prohibition absolute NEELEY 4 room’? onen V no the - jV j -which: the best Probably own is the in country manner Not only should country TLq DOES NO’p difference! of opinion SO political any in LIBERTY HEjDESIRES LIE AS DOING IN in treated are that his' as liberty liberty of minorities which toit club tlfeir individual judgment cannot trust-people you aftcl conscience1 and their Conviction discussion to as their in the health and drink of what they shall common name box with the' how can you trust’ tliem ’at the ballot sense SAYS: liberty demand of drink to I wrong Noted uuvmj uv c’would 1 power-toumforce--X or ROOSEVELT wfill a the ’slurs that notwithstanding are tliati it jman dares who oppose evry — andj’iiisj in the interest saloon working intemperance favors If j citizer a prohibition ( good whollyi wiiuru WILLIAMS that aiidzl ol r STATES am I - “The sale fight J ip r udiiyextuikjc UNITED r dn tn luKo i is’ - f-el tide of the the sale iting of liqUors intoxicating its butj lead intended would lead purpose of inferior wines and liquors” arbitrary snowp otner experience war temperance nxe oy ine oi iniiuence uui reuuveu uy iawmaKiugDUi morality and religion”: i Ihaye nuvuvuvuig Ipromote to measures proposed amendment appropriate provoke The obedience xiii THEODORE I ix IL in j a-urc-i they and ’‘Tha uivwo law ! ’ CLERGYMAN NOTED wide I' failed -xiaJ ! prohibition HOLMES' WENDELL three 18G2 ntternntinir is JV T X seem strikes x unusual Letnslntiire ' PHILOSO- AND JUUIUIIIVU law inoperative — CROSBY throws “Prohibition 1 ' 1 At! vAnnrr mrn lioitles intheir Xtogether get and have Al aUI4LL A A A a a A A ikCb 11114 U11V-A1 lldfU lUUUUlll eftl that eseftlubs have sure ii hs have an very verv bad am all prpvibusly previbusly have feet in that young men who never drank at ank done the of the secrecy it so can as they that iney ub m be it not seenjo drink bar but they do their over a in H AUTHOR Ir- use i2x --l biuitis D believe Ik clubs 11 ClCTlWTCTr themselves Zk VIIVAUOUJILO closers L4UUO their I ' that the live in onri HOWARD -‘T BISHOP 4 prevent make l matter” for candidate he vetoed York enforce by would Ji (NOTE© there be any shouldn’t l:i vv and worship to should i the Droves not within is T X con crimes r of forms designed or are that! which i intemperance suppress measures x which Q Prohibition 41' J? CHARLES j 5 u-' 111 QI LO Uv HOL Xtw UVGvH Uljr £JxWlUwU la fooltof jshimself is ho makes why one person reason cause the should be‘deprived ofat next person The people of Amer-ica th to ones j TOLSTOI drink? 1-4 of the subject and to the friends owe meas belief add the of that intemperance exp session mv be by extirpated prohibitory laws They are not ’consistent principles of with legislation Like decrees to sound it a I New of be — would proohibitory KUiuiiury does qot pro- ' enact rto under drunkenness I !'? i 1 DR IOWA O beiore was -' iivuoi not I as or desired— do j ’ 1852 York in Legislature and the state Governor While be law iiiivu ? could nrohibitioon to “I long” very state 1 SEYMOUR New of party fl 'J 1 much as ever BISHOP i to where Legislature prohibition statewide and LEO bill nrohibition a of 1868 in President i option liquor ‘ it HI Salem the-Illinois of HORATIO 1 in tavern a member a both for government our law mil TENNESSEE O the-1 jsiiid end? 1 I temperance itself succeed T i d The profoundlywrong and calledu'a the reach and PATTERSON be No better ah i dust! the :e as VUI-lU f tn ntfpmnt successful the ithat (shoulders W nronerlv or tne Legislature Illinois its on hr bb cannot appreciates : VrlliXU of cause laws thUt is “There I ’ within which which on in ran n While against not speech Linco Abraham by load possibly holic in that it attempts reason legislation and in making A crimes! prohibition law principles a rom the intemperance of are very founded”— i bounds injury great of appetite mans of out a the beyond goes work species a Senate of ERITY BISHOP and nat- WISDOM:: to that could could f LINCOLN’S oflipeppld MALCOLM which ' ngui STATESMAN ihnsrshnwn os “Prohibition is fundamentally The !6ny governmental policy I -Vx 1 I any EX-GOV SAYS society hit community carry -can true office is to declare and duties and take none natural right to commit agand this is all another from lis idea him: onite The un restrain to i that has man prohib-in sentiment will and regulate’ rights natural ou us Dublin for contest the appetite “Tho sump- is 4 ! ! their That wer nc only the sufficiently not liquor intoxicating of 1 vir ol 1’ States Senator’ resident Secletaty of Statje United Times 1 b AMERICAN SHERMAN! JOHN Many of reason iiiccipauic by presented is sometimes JEERSON legislators are ur- limit ful : sale by 1 ! ’ : variance at more law which coiiiuiuijJLLWbj are THOiIAS z : inc SAYS: utterly enact to iHiing which TAT nothing localities where under penalty the does not immediate c immunity of enforcement lawr the ited 4 than surroi torcement tjiary more policy sound conciiiiuns uiic WILLIAMH foolish 1 ? ! is greatest those ilwhp blindlyj jix habits of hll the to-follow -than which laws demand tlieir ' PRESIDENT J - eminent philosophy ’-the! I I I III - accorded' beep I leorip Preea Review AILURE a ’I z ’’ f J I ’ because - h H - - -- i ? The with conform WHO MEN - - "?r : O liberty personal to men LEADERS 'K ‘ J Y V:-' -fi j THE f s I ' f in " x t ’ J ji ''I-! -iSSiS j fl I -- - ” : " I M- - - - - SEOTION " '-Xj'r 'k-Jh t- ' ul x 4 1 I? k— k i r W J 1 ' f S |