Show I JUDGE JENKINS TO THE RESCUE Wisconsin Republican Con Congressman Congressman gressman Backs Up the No Notorious Notorious Jeter Pritchard SEES TROUBLES AHEAD POSSIBLE DISRUPTION OF THE UNON Chippewa Falls Fall Wis Aug man Jenkins chairman of the house jud judiciary committee last night Issued a statement relative to the North Carolina railroad rate He sa says s th there re has never been my any event since the civil I war th that t calls for tor so 50 severe re condemnation tion as the recent senseless tirade on be behalf halt half of states against the nation lie He Headds adds that It Is humiliating that the mat matter matter ter has Hn boon been compromised and that the nation has to some extent surrendered The civil war was the result of such agitation and we ma may have hae earlier th n nwe we want another civil War he said UTo To avert such a calamity and preserve the nation we must conform to the law Jaw oby obay the law and have the law enforced ac according according cording to the framework provided In the constitution Supreme Court Final Arbiter Judge Jenkins points out the su supreme supreme preme court of the United States Is made the final judge between state and nation Mr Jenkins believes the executive of the state should keep cool maintain his dig dignity and remember we have to depend upon the judiciary judicial of the countr country to save the union Ever since the civil war he said other states have had similar troubles trouble and did not make fools Cools of themselves or declare war and the questions were de decided decided b by the supreme court and no bad results folloWed If all state authorities are going to usurp functions ns of the su an supreme preme court and judge what federal act shaH be nullified no one can Jell where it will vill end Why state authorities decide they shan shall exercise every cery pow power r at their command to prevent such consummation This Is an unlawful attempt to lawful efforts Will End in Bloodshed This talk about state authorities rE r federal power b by armed force will sooner or later end In bloodshed possibly In the disruption of the union In conclusion Mr Jenkins sa says s the su supreme supreme preme court of the United States ma may err errIt rr It may differ the views or of a great majority of the p people ople but however that ma may be the constitution says Its decision Is final and must be regarded as the su an pr promo me law of the land hand and that It must govern us Better live under a wrong decision than amidst anarchy that must prevail In Inthis inthis this country if each state authority in ingoing going to disregard the constitution of the United States own power i right or wrOng of the national power weakening and abo absolutely disregarding this great government that tha has cost ost so many generations so much to tomake tomake make and Il |