Show r miUNDS 1 MMUMANfeUHK < I tt 1 Some of our 1 islcin iliuH0es charge if ti e Senator dinunilH with ineonsistcnrv itt 1 fivonn the ilibfrtialiit > cmont of women ti t4 in Utah and ut the HUIIO time urging tho I right uf tho icntlci hex to vote in tine a new Stile which it is plopo ell to net I out of Washington lemton 1 1 1 When tho bill iovldin0for the ilmi 1 sion of the latter I lenitorj us iv State was i i mi ler discussion in tho Senate on tho 7lh I it thi r mst Mr I ustis of Ixmisiant moved m hOI amendment confining the right of sulfi ino in the propose 1 now State to iju ilillod it male electors onlv I and III suppoit of his ttt i F amen Imcnl H ml ho reDr udcd tire decision of the Son ite is cprcscl in till provisions I pro-visions of tier now I dlllllllll hill wobtip I Inane In disfrincliiHin tiio women of Utah as a piece lent to Hliow tho power II of Congress III tho present instance Mr ii it dmunds I lujilie tli it ho nan no force in tho argument drawn front tho course 1 C Bti of tho bcnato in re gird to woman 4 a uullrato in Utah Nutty women hall C t written to him with objurgations i i for Ida action is to womm HiiHia0o in I I l t s n Utah but ho was too happy to uav that I 4I not one such letter came from Utah il j I though nian > letters ill come to him t from there Aii1 1 boliovin III the right I tO I of omen to vote in I the propose btitu I tho ijuestion having bean so decided In I J ti the paoplocf the Territory I dmun Is I would Vote aMinst tlio amendment t moved by Mr 1 ustis C I In view of this explanation IliA dilli I cult to conjure up unj thing that looks It like Inconsistency on tins pirt of heiutor t Fdmunls IIo o > ilentlv believes that a C fr in all the Territories where the local legislatures have conferred the franchise upon women unless good reasons exist wIts thej should not bo allowed to vote Congreas ought not to interfere inter-fere in tho remises i But so far as Utah is concerned Mr 1 dmun Is and every bod else familiar with Utah affairs knows tint the billot was pliccd in tire hands of tho women and by them has all along been used solely for tho purpose pur-pose of perpetuating the rule of a 1 vile priesthood t 1 which preiches ninth 1 practices disobcdicneo to the laws of the Ian 1 and holds I tho allcyanco of Its Church members mem-bers f to bo iluc to a sodlled higher power l than tint of the Govern Hunt li under which they live In fact Mr dmunds I knows and wo nil know that woman suffrage suf-frage in Utah Is a positive evil and as nmli ought to bo abolished It is upon tbeso facts tint tho Senator bises his opposition to womm sufTrato in Utah and ho Is right If time electors of utah made tine stone patriotic use of tho billot that tire electors of Washington Territory do r the cisowoull bo altogether lifer cut anti 1 instcil of a Ivocitim tlio abol ishmeiitof woman suffrage m Utah we doubt not Mr 1 dmunds vote would be found recorded its favor Hut as the matter stands woman suffrage In this Territory is worso than a farce it is an nn mixed evil and no ehlrge of inconsistency inconsist-ency can lie at the door of nutty one whoa r who-a its abolishment hero ind jet opposes its abolishment in a Territory populitcl In liw ibiduiL 11111 1 lovnl People |