Show differences atred AIRED IN COURT hell i iriti I 1 or f c camei N cyin C piny trouble I 1 amk enill eni 11 llin I 1 it I 1 all 1 I 1 ii i mi fill lit 1 it ill I 1 c of nt I 1 ph 11 ili asti itina ull it I 1 ill 14 1 A I 1 it t nl ill judge J r honell how ell of ogden occupied aupied the binch of this thin diskint for jul judgil chidester last we 1 k ind and took or of the ea c athing in ili teresta ot of the tio i hith h anc I 1 c bi ban of ourt court record toi fill some time on thurdis the ci bic e ot of the fill buck belicic knolls creamer company coni anY again ak aint t the vallen compan ath is presented to ane court the ibe i iut issue ut nas as ili alienation aaion that the defend nd int comp in nib N ib ii indebted to the compin corn pin for rentals amounting mounting i to something over the t csc is iq irid still uli ind taken ancl r adi advisement 1 I he ct c of eiph et ct 1 I 1 l ab b e I 1 valley vallen co pro rd A 3 poul touko n C ct t ai dl d the other IN to 0 d aliis i the pi brought it I 1 n to h hut I 1 L mr ZIS b fill of nf the freamen com pinN indri in all a ai counting coun tini of ili hi mail figment to th toa holder hold cri according accordi nR tocci tun terms ot if lie he I 1 ran t r to out oust the offic cis is of tile amp dinv inv an I 1 eipl i int 1 I ice eier eiNer rc emd A I 1 act mth etli tile the mople giol gio Cic Cici imery meTy co of lus lob ng elob dm and foi othea aue tile the chui coui cobit I 1 ilter after the c ie m vis is sub knitted poul n to rendi an all ik at dis dib in ill claudins i I 1 finina I 1 ia I 1 K 1 I 1 ait oit I t of if the ec cn n of the comper him from pacing laine ii mores to himself the conti contract act with ith the cill cili lilt compia ind and orill led thit th it the ae bejer ler nallen lle Ci creim emiLiN i pi int ie put b in I 1 finian 2 dyni 2913 ahe plaintiffs ancic cic taint film filing ot of the fl ff idiots to file objections the cobit reruns jurisdiction 0 if thu the ld COPL coi |